Re: SmartURLs port

2007-12-06 Thread Don Brown
PROTECTED] wrote: I'm going to start working on the SmartURLs port. Here's what I'm planning: 1. Deprecate all the current codebehind annotations and classes I'm still not convinced this is a good idea, but as I said, I'll reserve judgment till the merge branch is ready. 2. Create a new package

Re: SmartURLs port

2007-12-06 Thread Ted Husted
than to trunk? I'm using/improving Codebehind right now in some of the new features both in core and the rest plugin. I'd also like a chance to fully review the changes before we dump the old. On 12/6/07, Brian Pontarelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm going to start working on the SmartURLs

Re: SmartURLs port

2007-12-06 Thread Ian Roughley
Pontarelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm going to start working on the SmartURLs port. Here's what I'm planning: 1. Deprecate all the current codebehind annotations and classes I'm still not convinced this is a good idea, but as I said, I'll reserve judgment till the merge branch is ready

Re: SmartURLs port

2007-12-06 Thread Brian Pontarelli
As long as it's a deprecation and not deletion, I think it will be fine. i.e. in 2.1.x you can configure the app to use the old mechanism. The only other (really small picky thing) is the name codebehind. What I see Brian doing to providing mapping and configuration. When I think of

SmartURLs port

2007-12-05 Thread Brian Pontarelli
I'm going to start working on the SmartURLs port. Here's what I'm planning: 1. Deprecate all the current codebehind annotations and classes 2. Create a new package named org.apache.struts2.plugin.codebehind 3. Move the SmartURLs classes over (simple re-package) 4. Move annotations