Re: Version number ordering

2009-12-18 Thread Paul Benedict
Sweet! Thanks, Lukasz. I voted for it. I hope everyone else here votes for it too. On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 1:13 AM, Lukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, Here is the solution for our problem - http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRELEASE-159 though either we need to wait for

Re: Version number ordering

2009-12-18 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2009/12/18 Paul Benedict pbened...@apache.org: Sweet! Thanks, Lukasz. I voted for it. I hope everyone else here votes for it too. Sure, I added my vote also! Regards -- Lukasz http://www.lenart.org.pl/ - To unsubscribe,

Re: Version number ordering

2009-12-17 Thread Wes Wannemacher
would need to be 2.1.9-SNAPSHOT, no? After all, snapshots precede the number they're attached to, in terms of version number ordering. I just switched to 2.1.8-SNAPSHOT because Maven release plugin is complaining - after I did the release, everything is ok, please check already released

Re: Version number ordering

2009-12-17 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2009/12/17 Wes Wannemacher w...@wantii.com: When I was checking this, it reminded me of something I have been meaning to ask. If you look at the tag name that Lukasz used - struts2-archetype-starter-2.1.8.1 But, somewhere in our docs, we use a tag name like this -

Re: Version number ordering

2009-12-17 Thread Wes Wannemacher
Lukasz, don't worry about it... One of the nice (depending on your perspective) things about SVN over CVS is that tags are much easier to correct... We could `svn move` that directory to the proper name, but I wanted to know if there is any good reason to use that other convention. I'd rather see

Re: Version number ordering

2009-12-17 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2009/12/17 Wes Wannemacher w...@wantii.com: If no one responds, I will probably update the docs so that we take the default. But, if an artifact is already released, we should probably leave it as-is, since the released pom

Re: Version number ordering

2009-12-17 Thread Musachy Barroso
I am +1 for using the default that maven suggest. Less to remember and document. musachy On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Lukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com wrote: 2009/12/17 Wes Wannemacher w...@wantii.com: If no one responds, I will probably update the docs so that we take the

Re: Version number ordering

2009-12-17 Thread Martin Cooper
to, in terms of version number ordering. I just switched to 2.1.8-SNAPSHOT because Maven release plugin is complaining - after I did the release, everything is ok, please check already released pom.xml https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/maven/trunk/struts2-archetype-blank/pom.xml Regards

Re: Version number ordering

2009-12-17 Thread Paul Benedict
snapshot version we should be using now would need to be 2.1.9-SNAPSHOT, no? After all, snapshots precede the number they're attached to, in terms of version number ordering. I just switched to 2.1.8-SNAPSHOT because Maven release plugin is complaining - after I did the release, everything is ok

Re: Version number ordering

2009-12-17 Thread Martin Cooper
number ordering. I just switched to 2.1.8-SNAPSHOT because Maven release plugin is complaining - after I did the release, everything is ok, please check already released pom.xml https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/maven/trunk/struts2-archetype-blank/pom.xml Regards -- Lukasz http

Re: Version number ordering

2009-12-17 Thread Paul Benedict
what's going on, but that seems like going backwards. We already have a 2.1.8 and a 2.1.8.1, so it seems to me that any snapshot version we should be using now would need to be 2.1.9-SNAPSHOT, no? After all, snapshots precede the number they're attached to, in terms of version number ordering

Re: Version number ordering

2009-12-17 Thread Martin Cooper
they're attached to, in terms of version number ordering. I just switched to 2.1.8-SNAPSHOT because Maven release plugin is complaining - after I did the release, everything is ok, please check already released pom.xml https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/maven/trunk/struts2-archetype-blank

Re: Version number ordering

2009-12-17 Thread Paul Benedict
to be 2.1.9-SNAPSHOT, no? After all, snapshots precede the number they're attached to, in terms of version number ordering. I just switched to 2.1.8-SNAPSHOT because Maven release plugin is complaining - after I did the release, everything is ok, please check already released pom.xml https

Version number ordering

2009-12-16 Thread Martin Cooper
-SNAPSHOT, no? After all, snapshots precede the number they're attached to, in terms of version number ordering. -- Martin Cooper - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h

Re: Version number ordering

2009-12-16 Thread Lukasz Lenart
we should be using now would need to be 2.1.9-SNAPSHOT, no? After all, snapshots precede the number they're attached to, in terms of version number ordering. I just switched to 2.1.8-SNAPSHOT because Maven release plugin is complaining - after I did the release, everything is ok, please check