Website updated.
Please let me know if something doesn't work.
On 28 January 2011 08:06, Lukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com wrote:
2011/1/28 Maurizio Cucchiara maurizio.cucchi...@gmail.com:
Anyway I published the new version of the struts website on my publilc
html folder [6] please
Rather than deleting it, I moved /volunteers.html to my home directory, just in
case somebody really still wants it. Not sure how long it takes for the change
to be visible.
John
On 1/26/11 9:11 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara maurizio.cucchi...@gmail.com wrote:
There should be no problem to delete
Some things are never easy as they seem :)
Upgrading the site plugin to 2.2 is worth it:
* it includes some cool stuff like chmod parameter, etc
* it generates a more clean and reliably html code (compare [1] and
[2] how to create a patch, perhaps the right title should be how to
create a patch in
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara
maurizio.cucchi...@gmail.com wrote:
Some things are never easy as they seem :)
Upgrading the site plugin to 2.2 is worth it:
* it includes some cool stuff like chmod parameter, etc
* it generates a more clean and reliably html code (compare
2011/1/28 Maurizio Cucchiara maurizio.cucchi...@gmail.com:
Anyway I published the new version of the struts website on my publilc
html folder [6] please take a look and let me know if there is
something wrong.
Minor update to the downloads page
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122
Google lists only 4 pages that link to the old /volunteers.html:
http://www.google.com/search?q=link:http://struts.apache.org/volunteers.htmlhl=en
If nobody objects, I'll go ahead and delete it.
I tried building the site from source, but it gave me errors, so I'll leave
that alone :)
What do you think if we simply replace the old page with a symlink which
points to the update version?
Maurizio Cucchiara
On Jan 26, 2011 8:08 PM, John Lindal lind...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Google lists only 4 pages that link to the old /volunteers.html:
+1
-Wes
On 1/26/11, Maurizio Cucchiara maurizio.cucchi...@gmail.com wrote:
What do you think if we simply replace the old page with a symlink which
points to the update version?
Maurizio Cucchiara
On Jan 26, 2011 8:08 PM, John Lindal lind...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Google lists only 4 pages
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara
maurizio.cucchi...@gmail.com wrote:
What do you think if we simply replace the old page with a symlink which
points to the update version?
I see no reason to do that. It's an old, obsolete page, in the wrong
location. The location also
There should be no problem to delete it. We have to take care only of
two pages according to google [1]
I have already updated the announcement one. I also upgraded the site
plugin, from now it won't ignore paragraph format (take a look at the
differences between [2] and [3]).
Does anyone know if
2011/1/27 Maurizio Cucchiara maurizio.cucchi...@gmail.com:
Does anyone know if mvn site:deploy goal works? are there any side
effects (like file system permissions)?
or I have to deploy by hand?
Please read the docs
Currently, there are two different versions:
http://struts.apache.org/volunteers.html
http://struts.apache.org/dev/volunteers.html
The first one is clearly out of date, because the second one matches what is in
subversion.
Should I add a redirect in .htaccess to point /volunteers.html to
Hmm. The first one is very old (last published 15 Nov 2009), and at
least after a quick look, appears to have no counterpart in Subversion
any more, so it is quite probably an orphan page left over on the web
server from a site re-org some time ago. How did you reach it?
Unless we have incoming
While editing the volunteers page, I noticed that both Steve Raeburn
and James Turner appear twice. Was the intent of r280836 to move them
to the emeritus section?
--
Wendy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
On 12/28/05, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While editing the volunteers page, I noticed that both Steve Raeburn
and James Turner appear twice. Was the intent of r280836 to move them
to the emeritus section?
Good catch. Yes, that was indeed the intent.
--
Martin Cooper
--
Wendy
15 matches
Mail list logo
