On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara <maurizio.cucchi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Some things are never easy as they seem :) > Upgrading the site plugin to 2.2 is worth it: > * it includes some cool stuff like chmod parameter, etc > * it generates a more clean and reliably html code (compare [1] and > [2] "how to create a patch", perhaps the right title should be "how to > create a patch in this way" :) ) > > Things that I changed: > * I removed the ApacheCon logo, I think it's been a long time since > November (furthermore my firefox showed it in a wrong way).
I have a vague recollection that the ApacheCon logo addition / removal was supposed to happen automagically, driven by the concom people. Given that it's still there, either my memory is faulty, we didn't adopt whatever was supposed to give them control, or they (concom) forgot or changed their minds about it. Anyway, taking it off is fine with me. > * I also noticed that the date format on left-top page is changed, but > I think it sounds like a plugin-improvement, doesn't it?. It looked like the default has been changed to the ISO standard date format. That's fine. > * Another thing I realized is that the nightly build section [3] > contains a broken link. There is a dedicated bash script [4], but it > is a 4 years old script, it is almost ready to go to primary school. I > could take a look at this and try to rearrange it, but what do you > think if we drive the user to latest build on hudson? Ah, the nightly build is probably the one that used to run on the helios zone, which no longer exists (and hasn't for a while). We could point to Hudson if we think we need to make such builds available, or we can just let folks build it themselves. (These days, with Maven, that's not a big deal, IMO; it was a serious pain back in the early 1.x days, with the Ant builds.) > Anyway I published the new version of the struts website on my publilc > html folder [6] please take a look and let me know if there is > something wrong. I took a quick look, and it seems okay to me. -- Martin Cooper > Over and out. > > [1] http://struts.apache.org/helping.html#patches > [2] http://people.apache.org/~mcucchiara/site/helping.html#patches > [3] http://struts.apache.org/dev/builds.html#NightlyBuilds > [4] > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/struts/maven/trunk/scripts/nightly/nightly-2.0.x.sh?view=log > [5] > https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Struts2/org.apache.struts$struts2-assembly/lastBuild/ > [6] http://people.apache.org/~mcucchiara/site/index.html > On 27 January 2011 21:30, John Lindal <lind...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: >> Rather than deleting it, I moved /volunteers.html to my home directory, just >> in case somebody really still wants it. Not sure how long it takes for the >> change to be visible. >> >> John >> >> >> On 1/26/11 9:11 PM, "Maurizio Cucchiara" <maurizio.cucchi...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> There should be no problem to delete it. We have to take care only of >> two pages according to google [1] >> I have already updated the announcement one. I also upgraded the site >> plugin, from now it won't ignore paragraph format (take a look at the >> differences between [2] and [3]). >> Does anyone know if mvn site:deploy goal works? are there any side >> effects (like file system permissions)? >> or I have to deploy by hand? >> >> [1] >> http://www.google.it/search?as_lq=http%3A%2F%2Fstruts.apache.org%2Fvolunteers.html&hl=it&btnG=Cerca >> [2] http://struts.apache.org/volunteers.html#craigmcc >> [3] http://struts.apache.org/dev/volunteers.html#craigmcc >> On 27 January 2011 04:33, Martin Cooper <mart...@apache.org> wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara >>> <maurizio.cucchi...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> What do you think if we simply replace the old page with a symlink which >>>> points to the update version? >>> >>> I see no reason to do that. It's an old, obsolete page, in the wrong >>> location. The location also predates the ASF requirement that dev >>> pages live only within the dev section of the site. >>> >>> Let's just maintain the site we actually want instead of preserving >>> cruft just because it's there. >>> >>> -- >>> Martin Cooper >>> >>> >>>> Maurizio Cucchiara >>>> >>>> On Jan 26, 2011 8:08 PM, "John Lindal" <lind...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: >>>> Google lists only 4 pages that link to the old /volunteers.html: >>>> >>>> >>>> http://www.google.com/search?q=link:http://struts.apache.org/volunteers.html&hl=en >>>> >>>> If nobody objects, I'll go ahead and delete it. >>>> >>>> I tried building the site from source, but it gave me errors, so I'll leave >>>> that alone :) >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> John >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 1/25/11 9:03 PM, "Martin Cooper" <mart...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hmm. The first one is very old (l... >>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Maurizio Cucchiara >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >> >> >> > > > > -- > Maurizio Cucchiara > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
