Hi!
During the weekend I spent some time getting the embedded environment
updated to Pluto 2.0.2. So now it should be possible to use it with
JSR286 portlets.
Nils-H
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Rene Gielen wrote:
> Hey Nils,
>
> thanks for jumping in! Good to have this on Github so we cou
Yeah, I'm still around, trying to keep an eye on what's happening, so
I'll try to answer questions if you have any. It's really strange
though, it's been quiet around the JSR286 plugin for a looong time,
and then suddenly 4 people send me emails about it (outside struts
lists) in the same week. Wha
ttp://www.jgeppert.com
twitter: http://twitter.com/jogep
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/portlet2-plugin-tp30774658p30775781.html
Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To uns
Hey Nils,
thanks for jumping in! Good to have this on Github so we could fork it.
May we bother you with some questions if we don't get it fixed
ourselves? Last time I tried it, it wasn't working ...
- René
On 27.01.11 09:51, Nils-Helge Garli Hegvik wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Rene
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Rene Gielen wrote:
> Actual state:
> - JSR286 nature with automatic detection of the API version to use is
> implemented, but was not heavily tested till now. For test automation,
> we still lack a test container environment for 286 as we had for 168
> (customized
2011/1/27 Johannes Geppert :
> I agree to René the portlet2 version brings advantages to the developer
> and i think it is production ready. I work with it since over an year
> without trouble.
>
> When the events feature is marked as known TODO this plugin is ready for
> shipping out in next strut
wrote:
>> 2011/1/27 Johannes Geppert :
>>> is there any chance to get the portlet2 plugin out of the sandbox?
>>> I use this sandbox plugin and it works great except the eventing.
>>
>> What about the eventing, is it possible to improve that?
>>
>&g
Liferay as I know also have problem when implement 168
Too complex may be
/m/
-Original Message-
From: Rene Gielen
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 08:56:43
To: Struts Developers List
Reply-To: "Struts Developers List"
Subject: Re: portlet2 plugin
Actual state:
- JSR286 nature with
the main codebase. It should be by design a drop-in
replacement for the current plugin and it is backwards compatible. I
would say - let's go for it.
- René
On 27.01.11 08:37, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
> 2011/1/27 Johannes Geppert :
>> is there any chance to get the portlet2 plugin out
2011/1/27 Johannes Geppert :
> is there any chance to get the portlet2 plugin out of the sandbox?
> I use this sandbox plugin and it works great except the eventing.
What about the eventing, is it possible to improve that?
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Ka
That will be cool if we can collaborate with liferay also for portlet
--Original Message--
From: Johannes Geppert
To: dev@struts.apache.org
ReplyTo: Struts Developers List
Subject: portlet2 plugin
Sent: Jan 27, 2011 1:52 PM
Hi,
is there any chance to get the portlet2 plugin out of the
Hi,
is there any chance to get the portlet2 plugin out of the sandbox?
I use this sandbox plugin and it works great except the eventing.
Johannes
-
---
web: http://www.jgeppert.com
twitter: http://twitter.com/jogep
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/portlet2-plugin
12 matches
Mail list logo