On 2/17/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/17/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/17/06, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can't we all just use what we were using for the first 5 years of
Struts?
I'll rename them with underscores, for example:
On 2/18/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/17/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/17/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/17/06, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can't we all just use what we were using for the first 5 years of
Struts?
Author: husted
Date: Fri Feb 17 06:09:47 2006
New Revision: 378516
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=378516view=rev
Log:
Tagging the STRUTS-ACTION_1.3.0 build (per StrutsClassicRelease130)
Added:
struts/action/tags/STRUTS-ACTION_1.3.0/
- copied from r378515, struts/action/trunk/
Why are we changing the convention for tag naming now? We have always used
underscores in the tag names, ever since the STRUTS_0_5 tag way back when. I
don't see any reason to change that now.
--
Martin Cooper
On 2/17/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: husted
Date: Fri
On 2/17/06, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why are we changing the convention for tag naming now? We have always used
underscores in the tag names, ever since the STRUTS_0_5 tag way back when. I
don't see any reason to change that now.
I doubt it was intentional. I changed the release
On 2/17/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I doubt it was intentional. I changed the release plan to match what
actually happened, but I can change it back and 'svn mv' the tags to
the correct names.
Actually, both Shale and Scripting used the same format that Ted did:
Doh, I created the tag in the wrong place. As for the format, I just do
whatever Craig does :)
FWIW, I'd prefer we just used 1.0.0 as the tag name and got rid of all that
other stuff, but it isn't a big deal.
Don
Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 2/17/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I doubt
So then the question is why Craig decided to switch from the original
convention that he started almost 6 years ago and everyone else followed.
;-) I'd really prefer that we all use the same scheme, otherwise we'll just
end up with a mess, and nobody will ever remember the name they're supposed
to
On 2/17/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As for the format, I just do whatever Craig does :)
Me too. I checked what we did for Shale and Scripting and followed suit.
-Ted.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
On 2/17/06, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can't we all just use what we were using for the first 5 years of Struts?
I'll rename them with underscores, for example: STRUTS_ACTION_1_3_0. Okay?
(See also:
On 2/17/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/17/06, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can't we all just use what we were using for the first 5 years of
Struts?
I'll rename them with underscores, for example:
STRUTS_ACTION_1_3_0. Okay?
+1 from me. If this is done, could
11 matches
Mail list logo
