On Thursday 24 March 2011 07:41 PM, Kamesh Jayachandran wrote:
On 03/24/2011 05:54 PM, vijay wrote:
Just now I came to know that it fails in neon only.
I configured neon as a default ra_layer in my runtime configuration
area.
When I use serf as ra_layer, the commit succeeds.
Yes that
-qavm.apache.org
To: danie...@svn-qavm.apache.org
Subject: ./check@svn-qavm: $nickname: done: 20110404-09:33:52
Message-Id: 20110404094556.643c320...@svn-qavm.apache.org
make: *** [check] Error 1
URL: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk
Revision: 1088524
patching file subversion/libsvn_client
Thanks Vijay for the detailed summary and the fix.
I committed it at r1088602.
With regards
Kamesh Jayachandran
On 04/04/2011 12:00 PM, vijay wrote:
On Thursday 24 March 2011 07:41 PM, Kamesh Jayachandran wrote:
On 03/24/2011 05:54 PM, vijay wrote:
Just now I came to know that it fails in
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 4:56 AM, danie...@apache.org wrote:
Author: danielsh
Date: Mon Apr 4 09:56:58 2011
New Revision: 1088533
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1088533view=rev
Log:
Resolve issue #3469 (tree conflict under a directory external).
Does this mean the issue can be
-Original Message-
From: Philip Martin [mailto:philip.mar...@wandisco.com]
Sent: maandag 4 april 2011 17:37
To: dev@subversion.apache.org
Subject: notification backward compatibilty of the testsuite
I've been working on a revert implementation that fixes some correctness
On 04/04/2011 11:37 AM, Philip Martin wrote:
I've been working on a revert implementation that fixes some correctness
problems. A side effect of this change is that the notifications
change. In 1.6 revert only notifies for the root of an added tree, my
new code notifies for all the added
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 10:37:04AM -0500, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 4:56 AM, danie...@apache.org wrote:
Author: danielsh
Date: Mon Apr 4 09:56:58 2011
New Revision: 1088533
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1088533view=rev
Log:
Resolve issue #3469 (tree
Should we start building 1.7 binaries and ask people to test them?
We might call it beta testing or even early access builds or somesuch.
I don't really care about the name.
But there seems to be increased interest in 1.7 among our user base.
TortoiseSVN is already providing binaries based on
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote:
Would anyone be interested in helping out with creating binaries
for other systems?
I have been providing Windows binaries for the performance tests I posted.
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 05:30:53PM -0400, Mark Phippard wrote:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote:
I've run these tests on OpenBSD 4.9 (amd64) and got the following results:
Thanks. I added your results to the wiki
I posted an updated version of the benchmarks.
https://ctf.open.collab.net/sf/go/rel2820
The main change is that I added some merge scenarios to the tests of
working copies that have lots of folders and lots of files. Those two
working copies seem to better reveal any problems we have. I also
[Stefan Sperling]
I could try to create binaries for OpenSUSE (on the opensuse
buildservice) and Ubuntu (in a ppa).
I've done much of the prep work for providing snapshots for the Debian
'experimental' branch. Even when you enable it, updates from
experimental are not automated, you only get
kame...@apache.org wrote on Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 12:55:38 -:
@@ -438,5 +434,29 @@ fi
say PASS: master, slave are both at r4, as expected
-exit 0
+# The following test case is for the regression issue triggered by r917523.
+# The revision r917523 do some url encodings to the paths
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 7:11 PM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 01:04:20PM -0400, Mark Phippard wrote:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote:
Yes, I believe so. That was also the thread on users@ that made me
add this scenario
-Original Message-
From: phi...@apache.org [mailto:phi...@apache.org]
Sent: dinsdag 5 april 2011 2:01
To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
Subject: svn commit: r1088828 -
/subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline/revert_tests.py
Author: philip
Date: Tue Apr 5 00:01:03 2011
New
Hello, everyone. I'm a GSOC volunteer for Subversion.
I have prepared for this work just one month ago. I have browsed the
document on the subversion website, such as Subversion Design and
HACKING, also read the main .h files. Besides, I have built
subvesion source code and run the .c and .py
The files themselves used to be named with the revision number, but
this was removed so that automated tools could have a static URL from
which to grab the latest version.
While I don't think this change itself is particularly bad, I would
like to maintain the above invariant. Perhaps symlinking
Hyrum K Wright wrote on Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 22:37:49 -0500:
The files themselves used to be named with the revision number, but
this was removed so that automated tools could have a static URL from
which to grab the latest version.
While I don't think this change itself is particularly bad,
18 matches
Mail list logo
