Hyrum K Wright wrote on Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 22:37:49 -0500:
> The files themselves used to be named with the revision number, but
> this was removed so that automated tools could have a static URL from
> which to grab the latest version.
>
> While I don't think this change itself is particularly
The files themselves used to be named with the revision number, but
this was removed so that automated tools could have a static URL from
which to grab the latest version.
While I don't think this change itself is particularly bad, I would
like to maintain the above invariant. Perhaps symlinking
Hello, everyone. I'm a GSOC volunteer for Subversion.
I have prepared for this work just one month ago. I have browsed the
document on the subversion website, such as "Subversion Design" and
"HACKING", also read the main .h files. Besides, I have built
subvesion source code and run the .c and .py
> -Original Message-
> From: phi...@apache.org [mailto:phi...@apache.org]
> Sent: dinsdag 5 april 2011 2:01
> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: svn commit: r1088828 -
> /subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline/revert_tests.py
>
> Author: philip
> Date: Tue Apr 5 00:01:03 20
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 7:11 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 01:04:20PM -0400, Mark Phippard wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>>
>> >> Yes, I believe so. That was also the thread on users@ that made me
>> >> add this scenario into these bench
kame...@apache.org wrote on Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 12:55:38 -:
> @@ -438,5 +434,29 @@ fi
>
> say "PASS: master, slave are both at r4, as expected"
>
> -exit 0
> +# The following test case is for the regression issue triggered by r917523.
> +# The revision r917523 do some url encodings to the
[Stefan Sperling]
> I could try to create binaries for OpenSUSE (on the opensuse
> buildservice) and Ubuntu (in a ppa).
I've done much of the prep work for providing snapshots for the Debian
'experimental' branch. Even when you enable it, updates from
experimental are not automated, you only get
I posted an updated version of the benchmarks.
https://ctf.open.collab.net/sf/go/rel2820
The main change is that I added some merge scenarios to the tests of
working copies that have lots of folders and lots of files. Those two
working copies seem to better reveal any problems we have. I also
p
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 05:30:53PM -0400, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>
> > I've run these tests on OpenBSD 4.9 (amd64) and got the following results:
>
> Thanks. I added your results to the wiki
>
> https://ctf.open.collab.net/sf/wiki/do/view
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> Would anyone be interested in helping out with creating binaries
> for other systems?
I have been providing Windows binaries for the performance tests I posted.
https://ctf.open.collab.net/sf/frs/do/listReleases/projects.csvn/frs.svn_bina
Should we start building 1.7 binaries and ask people to test them?
We might call it beta testing or even "early access builds" or somesuch.
I don't really care about the name.
But there seems to be increased interest in 1.7 among our user base.
TortoiseSVN is already providing binaries based on tr
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 10:37:04AM -0500, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 4:56 AM, wrote:
> > Author: danielsh
> > Date: Mon Apr 4 09:56:58 2011
> > New Revision: 1088533
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1088533&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Resolve issue #3469 (tree conflict
On 04/04/2011 11:37 AM, Philip Martin wrote:
> I've been working on a revert implementation that fixes some correctness
> problems. A side effect of this change is that the notifications
> change. In 1.6 revert only notifies for the root of an added tree, my
> new code notifies for all the added
> -Original Message-
> From: Philip Martin [mailto:philip.mar...@wandisco.com]
> Sent: maandag 4 april 2011 17:37
> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: notification backward compatibilty of the testsuite
>
> I've been working on a revert implementation that fixes some correctness
>
I've been working on a revert implementation that fixes some correctness
problems. A side effect of this change is that the notifications
change. In 1.6 revert only notifies for the root of an added tree, my
new code notifies for all the added nodes. This causes 3 of the
regression tests to fail
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 4:56 AM, wrote:
> Author: danielsh
> Date: Mon Apr 4 09:56:58 2011
> New Revision: 1088533
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1088533&view=rev
> Log:
> Resolve issue #3469 (tree conflict under a directory external).
Does this mean the issue can be closed?
-Hyrum
Thanks Vijay for the detailed summary and the fix.
I committed it at r1088602.
With regards
Kamesh Jayachandran
On 04/04/2011 12:00 PM, vijay wrote:
On Thursday 24 March 2011 07:41 PM, Kamesh Jayachandran wrote:
On 03/24/2011 05:54 PM, vijay wrote:
Just now I came to know that it fails in neo
-qavm.apache.org
To: danie...@svn-qavm.apache.org
Subject: ./check@svn-qavm: $nickname: done: 20110404-09:33:52
Message-Id: <20110404094556.643c320...@svn-qavm.apache.org>
make: *** [check] Error 1
URL: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk
Revision: 1088524
patching file subversion/libsvn_
18 matches
Mail list logo
