On 24.04.2011 13:09, Bert Huijben wrote:
For 1.7 there will probably be a flag which will allow you to shoot
yourself
in the foot by processing local-only versions of svn:externals properties.
Which resolves the common How can I test svn:externals? and Can I have
my
own externals to override
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 09:21, Stefan Küng tortoise...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24.04.2011 13:09, Bert Huijben wrote:
For 1.7 there will probably be a flag which will allow you to shoot
yourself
in the foot by processing local-only versions of svn:externals
properties.
Which resolves the
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 10:03, Stefan Küng tortoise...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 09:21, Stefan Küng tortoise...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24.04.2011 13:09, Bert Huijben wrote:
For 1.7 there will probably be a flag which will allow you to shoot
yourself
in the foot by processing
This looks like it could be long-standing bug. Backport?
-Hyrum
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 6:47 AM, rhuij...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rhuijben
Date: Mon Apr 25 11:47:42 2011
New Revision: 1096460
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1096460view=rev
Log:
For ra_local, allocate the result
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 01:08:24 +0200:
2011/4/22 Branko Čibej br...@e-reka.si:
Meh. For now, just hack a special case so that committing one half of a
case-only rename will automagically commit the other half. Shouldn't be
too hard to do, and it's almost impossible to
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 01:08:24 +0200:
2011/4/22 Branko Čibej br...@e-reka.si:
Meh. For now, just hack a special case so that committing one half of a
case-only rename will automagically commit the other half. Shouldn't be
too hard to do, and it's almost impossible to
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 5:21 AM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 07:15 +1000, Daniel Becroft djcbecr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I've just updated to trunk@1096029, and have noticed the following change in
behavior.
Previously, any reproduction script I write
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 4:47 AM, rhuij...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rhuijben
Date: Tue Apr 12 09:47:06 2011
New Revision: 1091349
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1091349view=rev
Log:
Use one db operation instead of a few when looking whether to set read-only
and executable.
*
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 6:09 AM, rhuij...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rhuijben
Date: Sun Apr 24 11:09:29 2011
New Revision: 1096306
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1096306view=rev
Log:
At popular request: allow api users to choose whether they want to apply local
property changes when
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Hyrum K Wright hy...@hyrumwright.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 4:47 AM, rhuij...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rhuijben
Date: Tue Apr 12 09:47:06 2011
New Revision: 1091349
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1091349view=rev
Log:
Use one db operation
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Paul Burba ptbu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 5:21 AM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name
wrote:
On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 07:15 +1000, Daniel Becroft djcbecr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I've just updated to trunk@1096029, and have noticed the
-Original Message-
From: Hyrum K Wright [mailto:hy...@hyrumwright.org]
Sent: maandag 25 april 2011 20:27
To: dev@subversion.apache.org
Cc: rhuij...@apache.org; comm...@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r1091349 -
/subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/translate.c
Good morning Paul,
Paul Burba wrote on Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 14:55:02 -0400:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Paul Burba ptbu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 5:21 AM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name
wrote:
On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 07:15 +1000, Daniel Becroft
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Hyrum K Wright [mailto:hy...@hyrumwright.org]
Sent: maandag 25 april 2011 20:27
To: dev@subversion.apache.org
Cc: rhuij...@apache.org; comm...@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 01:08:24 +0200:
2011/4/22 Branko Čibej br...@e-reka.si:
Meh. For now, just hack a special case so that committing one half of a
case-only rename will automagically
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 01:08:24 +0200:
2011/4/22 Branko Čibej br...@e-reka.si:
Meh. For now, just hack a special case so that committing one half of a
case-only rename will automagically
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 23:10:21 +0200:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name
wrote:
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 01:08:24 +0200:
2011/4/22 Branko Čibej br...@e-reka.si:
Meh. For now, just hack a special case so that
FYI: This has a slight alteration in the post-commit work queue item
skel. If you've got un-cleaned up working copies laying around, this
may negatively impact them. :)
(I went ahead with the commit, without a format bump, since work queue
items are short lived, and we don't make any promises of
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 18:01, Hyrum Wright hwri...@apache.org wrote:
FYI: This has a slight alteration in the post-commit work queue item
skel. If you've got un-cleaned up working copies laying around, this
may negatively impact them. :)
(I went ahead with the commit, without a format bump,
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 18:51, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 18:01, Hyrum Wright hwri...@apache.org wrote:
FYI: This has a slight alteration in the post-commit work queue item
skel. If you've got un-cleaned up working copies laying around, this
may negatively
-Original Message-
From: hwri...@apache.org [mailto:hwri...@apache.org]
Sent: maandag 25 april 2011 23:59
To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
Subject: svn commit: r1096619 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc:
translate.c translate.h workqueue.c
Author: hwright
Date: Mon
Hi Everyone,
I could simply be wrong...
But I thought that when I previously ran get-deps.sh after checking out trunk,
That it retrieved a version of APR in the 1.4.X series.
I am still trying to get SVN compiled on my Mac so recently checked out the
latest copy Subversion from trunk.
Now, when
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 18:51, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 18:01, Hyrum Wright hwri...@apache.org wrote:
FYI: This has a slight alteration in the post-commit work queue item
skel. If you've got
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl wrote:
-Original Message-
From: hwri...@apache.org [mailto:hwri...@apache.org]
Sent: maandag 25 april 2011 23:59
To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
Subject: svn commit: r1096619 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Gavin Baumanis gav...@thespidernet.com wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I could simply be wrong...
But I thought that when I previously ran get-deps.sh after checking out trunk,
That it retrieved a version of APR in the 1.4.X series.
I am still trying to get SVN compiled
Noorul Islam K M noo...@collab.net writes:
Gavin Baumanis gav...@thespidernet.com writes:
Hi Noorul,
Just a quick message to see if you're still working on this patch or not?
My threads stop at the comments below from Andrew?
Someone has to review this and if everything is fine commit
Noorul Islam K M noo...@collab.net writes:
Log
[[
Follow-up to r1089786.
* subversion/svn/main.c
(main): Replace macro usage by constant output.
Patch by: Noorul Islam K M noorul{_AT_}collab.net
]]
Thanks and Regards
Noorul
Index: subversion/svn/main.c
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 20:56, Hyrum K Wright hy...@hyrumwright.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Instead, we've extended a skel so that the code can determine which
version you're using (eg. a new, optional element at the end). Or
we've chosen
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 21:06, Hyrum K Wright hy...@hyrumwright.org wrote:
...
Which kinda irks me, actually. You'd think something as simple as
ensure the permissions on disk match what's in the db would be
fairly straightforward, but it ends up have all kinds of special cases
and various
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 20:55, hwri...@apache.org wrote:
...
+++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/workqueue.c Tue Apr 26 00:55:55 2011
@@ -525,11 +525,16 @@ run_file_commit(svn_wc__db_t *db,
const svn_skel_t *arg1 = work_item-children-next;
const char *local_relpath;
const char
30 matches
Mail list logo
