Hi Daniel,
On Jun 28, 2011, at 4:45 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>
>> Yeah something like this is what I was thinking about with Greg. Like
>> wouldn't
>> it be nice if I could define something like:
>>
>> property: svn:external-ignores:foodir
>> value: *.pyc
>>
>> Then when pulling in an svn:ex
Reads fine.
I'd like to test this patch (perhaps later this week?).
Would
make davautocheck ENVVAR=short_circuit
be a better interface?
Noorul Islam K M wrote on Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 12:03:36 +0530:
> Index: Makefile.in
> ===
>
I see that 3.7.7.1 has just been released with this bugfix.
Thanks!!
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 14:01, Roger Binns wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 06/26/2011 03:52 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
>> The bug is that it is returning
>> SQLITE_SCHEMA instead of SQLITE_OK. If y
[ I tried to add a comment to the issue but the site timed out on
submitting the form ]
chrismattm...@tigris.org wrote on Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 13:53:08 -0700:
> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3941
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- Additional comments from chrismattm...@tigris.org Tu
hwri...@apache.org wrote on Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 21:47:06 -:
> Author: hwright
> Date: Tue Jun 28 21:47:06 2011
> New Revision: 1140861
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1140861&view=rev
> Log:
> * subversion/svnadmin/main.c
> (parse_args): Fix a theoretical bug by ensure we only att
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 00:39, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 16:21, wrote:
>>...
>> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/mod_dav_svn/reports/update.c Tue Jun 28
>> 20:21:03 2011
>> @@ -353,8 +353,8 @@ add_helper(svn_boolean_t is_dir,
>> "copyfrom-path=\"%s\
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 16:21, wrote:
>...
> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/mod_dav_svn/reports/update.c Tue Jun 28
> 20:21:03 2011
> @@ -353,8 +353,8 @@ add_helper(svn_boolean_t is_dir,
> "copyfrom-path=\"%s\" copyfrom-rev=\"%ld\">"
> D
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> As I recall, the problem is that we have to continually tweak things.
> Over and over and over. Edge cases never stop with libtool. It creates
> a continual maintenance nightmare.
Right.
libtool constantly requires lots of handholding to get i
Philipp,
Thanks for the analysis. I've made several commits which address the
issues in your log. Feel free to re-run to ensure that they were
fixed.
Thanks,
-Hyrum
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Philipp Kloke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I checked the sourcecode of subversion (r1140736) with cppcheck.
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> hwri...@apache.org wrote on Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 13:56:03 -:
>> +Before a release is officially made public, it must receive three +1
>> votes
>> +from members of the Subversion PMC. In addition, as a matter of project
>> +policy, we r
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 21:01, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 06:26, wrote:
>> Author: ivan
>> Date: Tue Jun 28 10:26:47 2011
>> New Revision: 1140512
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1140512&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Reduce memory used by processing PROPFIND requests for specf
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> hwri...@apache.org wrote on Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 02:46:36 -:
>> +Subversion extends the APR guidelines to cover client/server
>> +compatibility questions:
>> +
>> +
>> +
>> +A patch or minor number release of a server (or client) never
>
Hi,
I checked the sourcecode of subversion (r1140736) with cppcheck. Please have
a look on the result file in the attachement.
[SVN\subversion\bindings\javahl\native\JNIThreadData.cpp:40]: (warning)
Member variable 'JNIThreadData::m_formatBuffer' is not initialized in the
constructor.
[SVN\sub
Philip Martin writes:
> Greg Stein writes:
>
>> What *does* seem to be undisputed is that OpenSUSE has a broken
>> libtool installation that doesn't handle C++. Why are we working
>> around that?
>
> Subversion requires C++ support and APR doesn't. C++ support in libtool
> is optional. Can Sub
On 06/28/2011 01:37 PM, Paul Burba wrote:
> Hi Julian,
>
> I hadn't realized using in-out parameters was considered such bad
> form.
At a minimum, they force an API divergence in our bindings layers. +1 to
separate and explicit in and out parameters.
--
C. Michael Pilato
CollabNet <> www.
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
> I'm curious about the new 'validate_inherited_mergeinfo' parameter of
> svn_ra_get_mergeinfo2(), which is the public API that calls
> svn_ra__vtable_t.get_mergeinfo().
>
> /* ...
> * If the mergeinfo for any path is inherited and
> * @a *val
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 06:26, wrote:
> Author: ivan
> Date: Tue Jun 28 10:26:47 2011
> New Revision: 1140512
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1140512&view=rev
> Log:
> Reduce memory used by processing PROPFIND requests for specfici
> properties (not allprop).
>
> * subversion/mod_dav_sv
what's wrong with $EDITOR ?
:-)
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 12:40, wrote:
> Author: danielsh
> Date: Tue Jun 28 16:40:32 2011
> New Revision: 1140718
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1140718&view=rev
> Log:
> * docs/community-guide/releasing.part.html
> (release-stabilization): Fix E20500
Greg Stein writes:
> What *does* seem to be undisputed is that OpenSUSE has a broken
> libtool installation that doesn't handle C++. Why are we working
> around that?
Subversion requires C++ support and APR doesn't. C++ support in libtool
is optional. Can Subversion expect APR's libtool to sup
I'm curious about the new 'validate_inherited_mergeinfo' parameter of
svn_ra_get_mergeinfo2(), which is the public API that calls
svn_ra__vtable_t.get_mergeinfo().
/* ...
* If the mergeinfo for any path is inherited and
* @a *validate_inherited_mergeinfo is TRUE, then request that the server
*
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:48, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:22:09AM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>> Issue #3930 [1] ("build system assumes that APR libtool supports C++") is
>> marked as a 1.7.0 blocker, but is currently being held up by difference of
>> opinions about th
Stefan Sperling writes:
> When I upgraded a 1.6.x working copy of 2GB size, it took more than one hour.
> I eventually just aborted the upgrade. A checkout completes within
> a couple of minutes.
>
> The repository is remote and the bottleneck should be my 16MB/s downstream
> link (the server is
hwri...@apache.org wrote on Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 13:56:03 -:
> +Before a release is officially made public, it must receive three +1 votes
> +from members of the Subversion PMC. In addition, as a matter of project
> +policy, we require testing and signatures from PMC members on each
> +of the
hwri...@apache.org wrote on Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 02:46:36 -:
> +Subversion extends the APR guidelines to cover client/server
> +compatibility questions:
> +
> +
> +
> +A patch or minor number release of a server (or client) never
> + breaks compatibility with a client (or server) in the s
Stefan Sperling wrote on Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 13:45:11 +0200:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 03:36:32PM +0530, Arwin Arni wrote:
> > On Tuesday 28 June 2011 03:13 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > > 1) the working copy has no local mods
> > > 2) the working copy has no switched subtrees
> > > 3) the wor
[Daniel Shahaf]
> I believe some third-party implementations are GPL'd --- meaning that we
> can't borrow code from them --- so one should be careful in what parts
> of what implementations one chooses to read.
Indeed, my script is GPL, mostly because although I rewrote almost the
entire thing, i
Arwin Arni wrote on Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 15:45:04 +0530:
> On Tuesday 28 June 2011 03:36 PM, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
> >Stefan Sperling writes:
> >
> >>On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 03:12:22PM +0530, Arwin Arni wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Tuesday 28 June 2011 03:01 PM, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
> >+svn bisect
Hyrum K Wright wrote on Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:24:29 -0500:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
> > [ Haven't read the whole thread yet, quick response only to this sentence ]
> >
> > Peter Samuelson wrote on Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:11:45 -0500:
> >> This is why you should
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> [ Haven't read the whole thread yet, quick response only to this sentence ]
>
> Peter Samuelson wrote on Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:11:45 -0500:
>> This is why you should read the existing third-party implementations.
>
> I believe some third-p
[ Haven't read the whole thread yet, quick response only to this sentence ]
Peter Samuelson wrote on Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:11:45 -0500:
> This is why you should read the existing third-party implementations.
I believe some third-party implementations are GPL'd --- meaning that we
can't borrow c
> On Tuesday 28 June 2011 05:15 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> >You'll need to figure out the old and new URL before you update
> >to a new revision, and perform aswitch from/to the old/new URL
> >instead of an update incase the URLs don't match.
[Arwin Arni]
> Whoa! Didn't think of this at all. Wi
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:22:09AM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Issue #3930 [1] ("build system assumes that APR libtool supports C++") is
> marked as a 1.7.0 blocker, but is currently being held up by difference of
> opinions about the correct path forward. The complaint involves some code
>
Issue #3930 [1] ("build system assumes that APR libtool supports C++") is
marked as a 1.7.0 blocker, but is currently being held up by difference of
opinions about the correct path forward. The complaint involves some code
that was removed from the codebase some time ago. We have no record as to
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 06:07:00PM +0530, Arwin Arni wrote:
> Considering all these points,it should work this way:
>
> svn bisect --start -rN:M
>
> check for mixed rev, switched subtrees and local mods and error out
> if it is.
> Initialize the bisect env.
>
> svn bisect --run script
>
> --->
On Tuesday 28 June 2011 05:15 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 03:36:32PM +0530, Arwin Arni wrote:
On Tuesday 28 June 2011 03:13 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
1) the working copy has no local mods
2) the working copy has no switched subtrees
3) the working copy is at a unif
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 02:03:18PM +0100, Philip Martin wrote:
> Stefan Sperling writes:
>
> > Maybe we should tell people that they should only use update if
> > they have local mods, and perform a checkout otherwise.
> > This rule of thumb is probably going to yield the best overall results.
>
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 04:30:41PM +0530, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
> I found some more and here is the patch.
Thanks, r1140543.
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 03:36:32PM +0530, Arwin Arni wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 June 2011 03:13 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > 1) the working copy has no local mods
> > 2) the working copy has no switched subtrees
> > 3) the working copy is at a uniform revision
> >
> >These are also enforced by mer
On Tuesday 28 June 2011 03:36 PM, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
Stefan Sperling writes:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 03:12:22PM +0530, Arwin Arni wrote:
On Tuesday 28 June 2011 03:01 PM, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
+svn bisect start [-rN[:M]]
+
When we discussed you had a concern that above syntax is dif
On Jun 28, 2011 5:55 AM, wrote:
>
> Author: stsp
> Date: Tue Jun 28 09:55:04 2011
> New Revision: 1140505
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1140505&view=rev
> Log:
> stats++
> * subversion/libsvn_subr/io.c
> (svn_io_get_dir_filenames, temp_file_create): Fix indentation fallout
from
> th
On Tuesday 28 June 2011 03:32 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 03:12:22PM +0530, Arwin Arni wrote:
On Tuesday 28 June 2011 03:01 PM, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
+svn bisect start [-rN[:M]]
+
When we discussed you had a concern that above syntax is different from
the normal svn su
Stefan Sperling writes:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 03:12:22PM +0530, Arwin Arni wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday 28 June 2011 03:01 PM, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
>> >>+svn bisect start [-rN[:M]]
>> >>+
>> >When we discussed you had a concern that above syntax is different from
>> >the normal svn sub command s
On Tuesday 28 June 2011 03:13 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 08:43:40AM -, ar...@apache.org wrote:
Author: arwin
Date: Tue Jun 28 08:43:40 2011
New Revision: 1140482
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1140482&view=rev
Log:
Added a branch readme.
* BRANCH-README : New
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 03:12:22PM +0530, Arwin Arni wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 June 2011 03:01 PM, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
> >>+svn bisect start [-rN[:M]]
> >>+
> >When we discussed you had a concern that above syntax is different from
> >the normal svn sub command syntax. Is this finalized?
> >
>
>
This mail missed dev@ list. Forwarding it.
--- Begin Message ---
On Tuesday 28 June 2011 03:01 PM, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
> ar...@apache.org writes:
>
>> Author: arwin
>> Date: Tue Jun 28 08:43:40 2011
>> New Revision: 1140482
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1140482&view=rev
>> Log:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 08:43:40AM -, ar...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: arwin
> Date: Tue Jun 28 08:43:40 2011
> New Revision: 1140482
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1140482&view=rev
> Log:
> Added a branch readme.
> * BRANCH-README : New file.
>
> Added:
> subversion/branches/
ar...@apache.org writes:
> Author: arwin
> Date: Tue Jun 28 08:43:40 2011
> New Revision: 1140482
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1140482&view=rev
> Log:
> Added a branch readme.
> * BRANCH-README : New file.
>
> Added:
> subversion/branches/svn-bisect/BRANCH-README
>
> Added: subver
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 3:57 AM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 7:25 PM, wrote:
>> Author: jcorvel
>> Date: Tue Jun 28 00:25:57 2011
>> New Revision: 1140388
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1140388&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Fix a spurious failure of diff-diff3-test 2: '2-w
48 matches
Mail list logo
