Merge to 1.7.x?
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011, at 05:17, dongsh...@apache.org wrote:
Author: dongsheng
Date: Thu Dec 22 05:17:05 2011
New Revision: 1222040
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1222040view=rev
Log:
Making up for the missing single quotation mark.
Obvious fix.
Modified:
Stefan Sperling wrote:
Alexey Neyman wrote:
Stefan Sperling wrote:
I'd prefer keeping --no-diff-properties and add a --patch option
later which implies --no-diff-properties and maybe other options.
I was explicitly asked by Julian Foad to avoid adding more
low-level options (such as
Yes, I mean merge to 1.7.x.
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 17:51, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Merge to 1.7.x?
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011, at 05:17, dongsh...@apache.org wrote:
Author: dongsheng
Date: Thu Dec 22 05:17:05 2011
New Revision: 1222040
URL:
Hi Eric,
in the 0.5 draft, there's a paragraph about breaking history the
history of a flow.
[[[
A flow is a sequence of actions on a file or directory path that is
considered to be a single history for change-tracking purposes.
Creating a flow tells Subversion that you want to track the
So, are you going to merge it or nominate it in STATUS? You haven't done
either.
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011, at 20:36, Dongsheng Song wrote:
Yes, I mean merge to 1.7.x.
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 17:51, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Merge to 1.7.x?
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011, at
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 06:32:54PM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
So, are you going to merge it or nominate it in STATUS? You haven't done
either.
It has been applied to 1.7.x in r1222113.
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011, at 17:37, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 06:32:54PM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
So, are you going to merge it or nominate it in STATUS? You haven't done
either.
It has been applied to 1.7.x in r1222113.
The fix is not present in HEAD of 1.7.x.
Hi folks,
Following up on a recent thread [1] about svndumpfilter's incompatibility
with the v3 dump file format introduced in Subversion 1.1, I've started
to fix underlying API in this patch. Comment are welcome.
Is there an alternative solution that could be backported to 1.7?
Steve
[1]
Stephen Butler sbut...@elego.de:
in the 0.5 draft, there's a paragraph about breaking history the
history of a flow.
:
You might want to add that flows may be connected by copyfrom info.
Good point.
[various observations, ending with...]
There's also the phenomenon of evil twins, where
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 6:31 PM, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: stsp
Date: Fri Dec 23 00:31:51 2011
New Revision: 1222521
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1222521view=rev
Log:
Turn another wc-db assertion people are reporting into a normal error.
* subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.c
2011/12/23 Hyrum K Wright hyrum.wri...@wandisco.com:
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 6:31 PM, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: stsp
Date: Fri Dec 23 00:31:51 2011
New Revision: 1222521
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1222521view=rev
Log:
Turn another wc-db assertion people are reporting into
11 matches
Mail list logo
