On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 2:58 AM, stef...@apache.org wrote:
Author: stefan2
Date: Thu May 3 06:58:26 2012
New Revision: 124
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=124view=rev
Log:
Move private svn_hash API to a private header.
* subversion/include/svn_hash.h
(svn_hash__clear,
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 3:16 AM, stef...@apache.org wrote:
Author: stefan2
Date: Thu May 3 07:16:11 2012
New Revision: 126
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=126view=rev
Log:
Introduce private API functions that wrap apr_hash_make_custom
and return hash tables that are 2 to 4
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=126view=rev
Introduce private API functions that wrap apr_hash_make_custom
and return hash tables that are 2 to 4 times faster than the APR default.
Would it be sensible to propose these (the hash-functions) for inclusion in APR
itself?
Both yield
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 11:51:15AM +1000, Kenneth Miles wrote:
NOTE: master server is synced repository r0 property
svn:sync-from-url and URL is svn://voyager-svn:3691/egm/QLD-Releases
I was attempting a svnsync when the master server instance returned
a abort-edit because there was to many
stef...@apache.org writes:
Author: stefan2
Date: Thu May 3 07:16:11 2012
New Revision: 126
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=126view=rev
Log:
Introduce private API functions that wrap apr_hash_make_custom
and return hash tables that are 2 to 4 times faster than the APR
Philip Martin philip.mar...@wandisco.com writes:
stef...@apache.org writes:
Author: stefan2
Date: Thu May 3 07:16:11 2012
New Revision: 126
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=126view=rev
Log:
Introduce private API functions that wrap apr_hash_make_custom
and return hash
We are syncing a branch of the repository and have 11068 revisions. I tried
excluding some revisions via path based authorization but got the same result.
I'm not sure what is required or where to look to replicate in another
repository. I have a copy of the repositories to test in gdb and can
Ken Miles kmi...@voyagergaming.com writes:
We are syncing a branch of the repository and have 11068 revisions. I
tried excluding some revisions via path based authorization but got
the same result. I'm not sure what is required or where to look to
replicate in another repository. I have a
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 3:13 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 6:45 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
...
There is a single open issue that I believe warrants a fix for 1.8, and that
is the
Helllo Stefan.
Thanks for trying to solve this problem.
Unfortunately you patch doesn't solve the problem because of 2 reasons.
1. It doesn't change target (in diff request), and it still may contain '/'.
2. If in my example (just replace http://localhost/svn == file:///tmp/test)
diff fails if I
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 02:43:11PM +0200, Dmitry Pavlenko wrote:
Helllo Stefan.
Thanks for trying to solve this problem.
Unfortunately you patch doesn't solve the problem because of 2 reasons.
1. It doesn't change target (in diff request), and it still may contain '/'.
2. If in my example
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 11:42 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Philip Martin
philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote:
Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com writes:
I don't know what
Dmitry Pavlenko pavle...@tmatesoft.com writes:
I.e. if I set svn:eol-style before svn:mime-type, everything is
ok. Otherwise there can be a problem. What behaviour is expected:
failure in both cases or success in both of them?
svn:eol-style before svn:mime-type:
$ svn propset svn:eol-style
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 02:51:54PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
I don't want a solution that requires a server upgrade.
This is a user-interface problem. The client/server interaction
is capable of producing the required information. We just have to
display the information in a better way.
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 02:54:02PM -0400, Greg Stein wrote:
Other possibilities might be something like:
E: error message here
W: warning message here
I'd be fine with this because this way most lines will still be less
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 03:02:07PM -0400, Greg Stein wrote:
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 02:54:02PM -0400, Greg Stein wrote:
Other possibilities might be something like:
E: error message here
W: warning message here
I'd
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
[2] On a Solaris build machine @work (Solaris 10 on x86 on ESX, with
1.6.17 client, 1.5.4 server (sorry, old stuff)), most interactions
with the svn server are a lot faster when using serf than with neon.
Things
Can this patch be marked as an issue or enhancement idea?
[I'm not sure of the process but would like to help get this implemented if
possible.]
Thanks,
- Mark
-Original Message-
From: MARTIN PHILIP [mailto:codematt...@ntlworld.com] On Behalf Of Philip Martin
Sent: Tuesday, May 01,
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 2:16 AM, stef...@apache.org wrote:
Author: stefan2
Date: Thu May 3 07:16:11 2012
New Revision: 126
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=126view=rev
Log:
Introduce private API functions that wrap apr_hash_make_custom
and return hash tables that are 2 to 4
Thanks, Stefan,
I like the approach of a fake checkout. Actually this is what I meant by
proposing to handle this
case separatedly.
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 02:51:54PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
I don't want a solution that requires a server upgrade.
This is a user-interface problem. The
Hyrum,
switch 29 and update 44 are failing, but that was due to my work in
r1332881. I need to get back and figure those out (first saw it on
ra_serf, but didn't realize until today it also affected ra_local).
The revision below does *not* yet verify driver-ordering of deletes vs
adds. I might
So what would be the next steps.
Thank you,
Vladimir
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Vladimir Berezniker v...@hitechman.comwrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Hyrum K Wright
hyrum.wri...@wandisco.com wrote:
I haven't reviewed the patched, but some comments about the general ideas
On 03/05/12 22:07, Philip Martin wrote:
Ken Mileskmi...@voyagergaming.com writes:
We are syncing a branch of the repository and have 11068 revisions. I
tried excluding some revisions via path based authorization but got
the same result. I'm not sure what is required or where to look to
On 04/05/12 15:21, Kenneth Miles wrote:
On 03/05/12 22:07, Philip Martin wrote:
Ken Mileskmi...@voyagergaming.com writes:
We are syncing a branch of the repository and have 11068 revisions. I
tried excluding some revisions via path based authorization but got
the same result. I'm not sure
24 matches
Mail list logo
