On 2012-06-20 02:48:23 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2012-06-19 19:41:51 +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
I assume that the binary svndiff chunks are different, right?
Yes, the binary svndiff chunks are different and have the declared
size. But why is 1.6.17 better than 1.7.5?
And the
On 06/20/2012 10:22 PM, kmra...@rockwellcollins.com wrote:
Dmitry Pavlenko pavle...@tmatesoft.com wrote on 06/20/2012 11:14:58 AM:
simple_providers.c (svn_auth__simple_creds_cache_get): I propose to
drop all assignments
need_to_save = FALSE except the initial one; otherwise assignment
to
Philip and I were just chatting about the 1.8 release and where we are
on that. For a thought experiment, we asked, can we ship trunk
today? The answer was no for three specific items:
* local moves are kinda broken (thus: fix or roll back)
* svnrdump does not work over ra_serf (move to Ev2
Can/should we focus on fixing these and shipping sooner rather than
later? Are there items that should/must go into 1.8 that aren't on
deck today?
I would really like to see #4176 resolved in v1.7.x or v1.8.x. It's a
major issue for us and our usage of svn (wc-ng) working copies on network
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 03:13:51AM -0700, Bert Huijben wrote:
Another option would be to make svn choose the new behavior by not
passing a conflict resolver the old way.
And maybe you couls even take this one one step further by also calling
the new standalone conflict resolver from svn.
Greg Stein wrote on Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 09:42:40 -0400:
Hey all,
Philip and I were just chatting about the 1.8 release and where we are
on that. For a thought experiment, we asked, can we ship trunk
today?
There have been 3-4 new FSFS features in 1.8 (incremental hotcopy,
dir
kmra...@rockwellcollins.com wrote on Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 09:09:46 -0500:
Also, specifying --without-apxs does not correctly disable building
mod_dav_svn and mod_dontdothat. The build fails with a missing httpd.h,
error, so I pointed it to my local build of httpd as a workaround.
httpd 2.2
From: Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de
Also, specifying --without-apxs does not correctly disable building
mod_dav_svn and mod_dontdothat. The build fails with a missing
httpd.h,
error, so I pointed it to my local build of httpd as a workaround.
httpd 2.2 or 2.4?
I pointed it to
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de wrote:
Greg Stein wrote on Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 09:42:40 -0400:
Hey all,
Philip and I were just chatting about the 1.8 release and where we are
on that. For a thought experiment, we asked, can we ship trunk
today?
There have
On 06/20/2012 08:34 PM, v...@apache.org wrote:
Author: vmpn
Date: Thu Jun 21 03:34:05 2012
New Revision: 1352400
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1352400view=rev
Log:
On the javahl-ra branch:
JavaHL: New method for creating java objects linked to their C++ counterpart
[ in
kmra...@rockwellcollins.com wrote on Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:36:29 -0500:
From: Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de
Also, specifying --without-apxs does not correctly disable building
mod_dav_svn and mod_dontdothat. The build fails with a missing
httpd.h,
error, so I pointed it to my
Greg Stein wrote on Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 13:37:14 -0400:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de wrote:
Greg Stein wrote on Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 09:42:40 -0400:
Hey all,
Philip and I were just chatting about the 1.8 release and where we are
on that. For a
Here's another crack at correcting ra_serf's handling of explicitly
requested non-existent properties.
--
C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.net
CollabNet www.collab.net Enterprise Cloud Development
Give ra_serf the power to properly recognize non-existent properties
explicitly
Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de wrote on 06/21/2012 12:57:46 PM:
Also, specifying --without-apxs does not correctly disable
building
mod_dav_svn and mod_dontdothat. The build fails with a missing
httpd.h,
error, so I pointed it to my local build of httpd as a workaround.
On 06/21/2012 02:09 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
Here's another crack at correcting ra_serf's handling of explicitly
requested non-existent properties.
Ignore this. It fails tests in an odd way.
--
C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.net
CollabNet www.collab.net Enterprise Cloud
On Jun 21, 2012 7:00 PM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de wrote:
Greg Stein wrote on Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 13:37:14 -0400:
...
I'm just wondering if we can get a handle on the precise things that
need to be completed, fixed, or backed out. We've been coding without
What I had in mind was
On Jun 21, 2012 7:22 PM, C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.net wrote:
On 06/21/2012 02:09 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
Here's another crack at correcting ra_serf's handling of explicitly
requested non-existent properties.
Ignore this. It fails tests in an odd way.
ps_props and ret_props
On 06/21/2012 03:23 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
On Jun 21, 2012 7:22 PM, C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.net
mailto:cmpil...@collab.net wrote:
On 06/21/2012 02:09 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
Here's another crack at correcting ra_serf's handling of explicitly
requested non-existent
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey all,
Philip and I were just chatting about the 1.8 release and where we are
on that. For a thought experiment, we asked, can we ship trunk
today? The answer was no for three specific items:
* local moves are kinda
On Jun 21, 2012 8:23 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 21, 2012 7:22 PM, C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.net wrote:
On 06/21/2012 02:09 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
Here's another crack at correcting ra_serf's handling of explicitly
requested non-existent properties.
kmra...@rockwellcollins.com wrote on Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 13:13:46 -0500:
Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de wrote on 06/21/2012 12:57:46 PM:
Also, specifying --without-apxs does not correctly disable
building
mod_dav_svn and mod_dontdothat. The build fails with a missing
httpd.h,
On 06/21/2012 04:08 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
I think that we should reduce number of PROPFINDs in checkout/update
over ra_serf somehow before releasing 1.8.
I think we've found Ivan's drum. :-)
--
C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.net
CollabNet www.collab.net Enterprise Cloud
On 06/21/2012 04:08 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
I think that we should reduce number of PROPFINDs in checkout/update
over ra_serf somehow before releasing 1.8.
I think we've found Ivan's drum. :-)
--
C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.net
CollabNet www.collab.net Enterprise Cloud
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Blair Zajac bl...@orcaware.com wrote:
On 06/20/2012 08:34 PM, v...@apache.org wrote:
Author: vmpn
Date: Thu Jun 21 03:34:05 2012
New Revision: 1352400
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?**rev=1352400view=revhttp://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1352400view=rev
Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2012-06-20 02:48:23 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2012-06-19 19:41:51 +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
I assume that the binary svndiff chunks are different, right?
Yes, the binary svndiff chunks are different and have the declared
size. But why is 1.6.17 better than
25 matches
Mail list logo
