On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 12:58 AM, Neels J Hofmeyr ne...@elego.de wrote:
Today Random Person on #svn reported a problem and later its apparent
solution, and it struck me as rather peculiar:
[[[
yates` when trying to do an svn cleanup, i get a strange message:
svn: E200030: disk I/O error,
Cygwin abstracts the windows io layer and then puts a UNIX like io layer on
top.
Sqlite then uses that io layer instead of the windows io layer it was
optimized for.
I'm certainly not surprised if you then see slight differences in locking
behavior if both implementations use the same database
Hi devs,
This week I had one of my how hard can it be? moments
and finally implemented revprop packing (did that mainly
offline). It passes all tests and seems to work pretty well.
It's design deviates from the existing revprop packing branch
in that it is more scalable and simpler to implement.
On 6 July 2012 09:04, Stefan Fuhrmann stefan.fuhrm...@wandisco.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 12:58 AM, Neels J Hofmeyr ne...@elego.de wrote:
Today Random Person on #svn reported a problem and later its apparent
solution, and it struck me as rather peculiar:
[[[
yates` when trying to do
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Simon Large simon.tortoise...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6 July 2012 09:04, Stefan Fuhrmann stefan.fuhrm...@wandisco.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 12:58 AM, Neels J Hofmeyr ne...@elego.de wrote:
Today Random Person on #svn reported a problem and later its apparent
On 06.07.2012 14:41, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
Ok, but I suppose that's mainly because of eol-style=native issues:
your cygwin client may have a different idea about what the native
eol-style is ... I don't think locking of the working copy (or working
copy database) has been considered when this
On 07/06/2012 04:32 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
Hi devs,
This week I had one of my how hard can it be? moments
and finally implemented revprop packing (did that mainly
offline). It passes all tests and seems to work pretty well.
Cool!
[...]
Since the new code will not be used unless you
On 7/6/12 6:27 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
On 07/06/2012 04:32 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
Hi devs,
This week I had one of my how hard can it be? moments
and finally implemented revprop packing (did that mainly
offline). It passes all tests and seems to work pretty well.
Cool!
[...]
Since
On 7/6/12 11:04 AM, stef...@apache.org wrote:
Author: stefan2
Date: Fri Jul 6 18:04:09 2012
New Revision: 1358322
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1358322view=rev
Log:
Relax overly strict consistency check that is not covered by the FSFS
format specification.
*
Stefan Sperling wrote on Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 10:21:22 +0200:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 11:15:57AM -0500, lfdon...@rockwellcollins.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to use svn_wc_prop_set4 to set a property on my local working
copy (1.7) and I keep getting the error:
No write-lock in
Every svn_wc API that changes the working copy requires its caller to
obtain a write lock. In the past that was done via the access batons
and now it requires another call.
But the most common ones are still private.
Bert Huijben (Cell phone)
From: Daniel Shahaf
Sent: 7-7-2012 1:02
To:
11 matches
Mail list logo
