On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Ivan Zhakov i...@visualsvn.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 10:43 PM, C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.net
wrote:
On 08/30/2012 10:45 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 4:56 PM, C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.net
wrote:
Theoretically,
On 03.09.2012 10:30, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Ivan Zhakov i...@visualsvn.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 10:43 PM, C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.net
wrote:
On 08/30/2012 10:45 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 4:56 PM, C. Michael Pilato
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Lieven Govaerts svn...@mobsol.be wrote:
Johan,
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 9:15 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 8:48 PM, Lieven Govaerts svn...@mobsol.be wrote:
Hi Johan,
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Johan Corveleyn
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 05:12:41PM +0100, Julian Foad wrote:
Stefan Sperling wrote:
The 1.6.17 release introduced a regression in write-through proxying
that can break commits to paths which need to be URI-encoded (see
r1088602 nomination in 1.6.x STATUS).
This is a conundrum for
As discussed in a different thread, I'd like to run the release
process for 1.6.19.
There are a handful of nominations in 1.6.x STATUS and it would be
nice to get as many as possible included in the next (possibly final?)
1.6.x release. I'm planning to roll tarballs for testing on Monday 10th,
phi...@apache.org writes:
Author: philip
Date: Mon Sep 3 08:59:54 2012
New Revision: 1380175
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1380175view=rev
Log:
Followup to r1242759 which removed the explicit D-Bus calls from the
GNOME keyring code. D-Bus is still used but it's all in the
Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name writes:
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote on Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 22:11:11
+0200:
We need to decide if we support GCC 4.3.0 on GNU systems.
Can't kwallet.m4 only require --enable-nls if the compiler is gcc 4.3 ?
Or if building some version of
Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote on Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 08:15:11 -0300:
Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name writes:
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote on Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 22:11:11
+0200:
We need to decide if we support GCC 4.3.0 on GNU systems.
Can't kwallet.m4 only require
Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name writes:
Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote on Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 08:15:11 -0300:
that, isn't the problem of disabling NLS, including
svn_private_config.h and risking including something else which may use
libintl.h independent of the kwallet code?
Are you
Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote on Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 08:15:11 -0300:
Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name writes:
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote on Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 22:11:11
+0200:
We need to decide if we support GCC 4.3.0 on GNU systems.
Can't kwallet.m4 only require
Hi,
It seems that the svn_config_t structure isn't thread safe, i.e. can't
be shared among multiple threads.
See here for a detailed report on what problems this causes:
http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=757dsMessageId=3003152
Is this by design? I assumed that all svn
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 19:44:45 +0100:
Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote on Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 08:15:11 -0300:
Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name writes:
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote on Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at
22:11:11 +0200:
We need to decide if we
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Küng [mailto:tortoise...@gmail.com]
Sent: maandag 3 september 2012 20:48
To: Subversion Development
Subject: thread safe
Hi,
It seems that the svn_config_t structure isn't thread safe, i.e. can't
be shared among multiple threads.
See here for
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Lieven,
When I run with svn-trunk@1377016 with serf-trunk@1634, I get the
following error pretty quickly (after a hundred files or so (but not
always the same one)):
[[[
svn: E120171: Error retrieving REPORT
On 03.09.2012 21:09, Bert Huijben wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Küng [mailto:tortoise...@gmail.com]
Sent: maandag 3 september 2012 20:48
To: Subversion Development
Subject: thread safe
Hi,
It seems that the svn_config_t structure isn't thread safe, i.e. can't
be shared
15 matches
Mail list logo