Re: Inline added-item properties in REPORT response

2012-09-03 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Ivan Zhakov i...@visualsvn.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 10:43 PM, C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.net wrote: On 08/30/2012 10:45 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote: On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 4:56 PM, C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.net wrote: Theoretically,

Re: Inline added-item properties in REPORT response

2012-09-03 Thread Branko Čibej
On 03.09.2012 10:30, Johan Corveleyn wrote: On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Ivan Zhakov i...@visualsvn.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 10:43 PM, C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.net wrote: On 08/30/2012 10:45 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote: On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 4:56 PM, C. Michael Pilato

Re: [PATCH] subversion issue #4174 - serf: checkout / export over https errors out with svn: E730053: Error retrieving REPORT (730053)

2012-09-03 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Lieven Govaerts svn...@mobsol.be wrote: Johan, On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 9:15 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 8:48 PM, Lieven Govaerts svn...@mobsol.be wrote: Hi Johan, On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Johan Corveleyn

Re: Another 1.6 release?

2012-09-03 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 05:12:41PM +0100, Julian Foad wrote: Stefan Sperling wrote: The 1.6.17 release introduced a regression in write-through proxying that can break commits to paths which need to be URI-encoded (see r1088602 nomination in 1.6.x STATUS). This is a conundrum for

Please vote for 1.6.x backports this week!

2012-09-03 Thread Stefan Sperling
As discussed in a different thread, I'd like to run the release process for 1.6.19. There are a handful of nominations in 1.6.x STATUS and it would be nice to get as many as possible included in the next (possibly final?) 1.6.x release. I'm planning to roll tarballs for testing on Monday 10th,

Re: svn commit: r1380175 - in /subversion/trunk: configure.ac subversion/libsvn_auth_gnome_keyring/gnome_keyring.c

2012-09-03 Thread Philip Martin
phi...@apache.org writes: Author: philip Date: Mon Sep 3 08:59:54 2012 New Revision: 1380175 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1380175view=rev Log: Followup to r1242759 which removed the explicit D-Bus calls from the GNOME keyring code. D-Bus is still used but it's all in the

Re: [PATCH] Remove NLS check from kwallet.m4 (was Re: Does KWallet support really need NLS on?)

2012-09-03 Thread Raphael Kubo da Costa
Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name writes: Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote on Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 22:11:11 +0200: We need to decide if we support GCC 4.3.0 on GNU systems. Can't kwallet.m4 only require --enable-nls if the compiler is gcc 4.3 ? Or if building some version of

Re: [PATCH] Remove NLS check from kwallet.m4 (was Re: Does KWallet support really need NLS on?)

2012-09-03 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote on Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 08:15:11 -0300: Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name writes: Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote on Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 22:11:11 +0200: We need to decide if we support GCC 4.3.0 on GNU systems. Can't kwallet.m4 only require

Re: [PATCH] Remove NLS check from kwallet.m4 (was Re: Does KWallet support really need NLS on?)

2012-09-03 Thread Raphael Kubo da Costa
Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name writes: Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote on Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 08:15:11 -0300: that, isn't the problem of disabling NLS, including svn_private_config.h and risking including something else which may use libintl.h independent of the kwallet code? Are you

Re: [PATCH] Remove NLS check from kwallet.m4 (was Re: Does KWallet support really need NLS on?)

2012-09-03 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote on Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 08:15:11 -0300: Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name writes: Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote on Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 22:11:11 +0200: We need to decide if we support GCC 4.3.0 on GNU systems. Can't kwallet.m4 only require

thread safe

2012-09-03 Thread Stefan Küng
Hi, It seems that the svn_config_t structure isn't thread safe, i.e. can't be shared among multiple threads. See here for a detailed report on what problems this causes: http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=757dsMessageId=3003152 Is this by design? I assumed that all svn

Re: [PATCH] Remove NLS check from kwallet.m4 (was Re: Does KWallet support really need NLS on?)

2012-09-03 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 19:44:45 +0100: Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote on Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 08:15:11 -0300: Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name writes: Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote on Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 22:11:11 +0200: We need to decide if we

RE: thread safe

2012-09-03 Thread Bert Huijben
-Original Message- From: Stefan Küng [mailto:tortoise...@gmail.com] Sent: maandag 3 september 2012 20:48 To: Subversion Development Subject: thread safe Hi, It seems that the svn_config_t structure isn't thread safe, i.e. can't be shared among multiple threads. See here for

Re: [PATCH] subversion issue #4174 - serf: checkout / export over https errors out with svn: E730053: Error retrieving REPORT (730053)

2012-09-03 Thread Lieven Govaerts
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Lieven, When I run with svn-trunk@1377016 with serf-trunk@1634, I get the following error pretty quickly (after a hundred files or so (but not always the same one)): [[[ svn: E120171: Error retrieving REPORT

Re: thread safe

2012-09-03 Thread Stefan Küng
On 03.09.2012 21:09, Bert Huijben wrote: -Original Message- From: Stefan Küng [mailto:tortoise...@gmail.com] Sent: maandag 3 september 2012 20:48 To: Subversion Development Subject: thread safe Hi, It seems that the svn_config_t structure isn't thread safe, i.e. can't be shared