On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:28 PM, Lieven Govaerts l...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
we seem to be raising and discussing a few different issues in this
thread. I've tried to summarize current status with some added
observations.
I propose to start up separate mail threads when discussing one of
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name]
Sent: donderdag 8 november 2012 08:07
To: dev@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r1406870 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion:
libsvn_wc/update_editor.c libsvn_wc/wc_db_wcroot.c
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name]
Sent: donderdag 8 november 2012 08:10
To: dev@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r1406870 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion:
libsvn_wc/update_editor.c libsvn_wc/wc_db_wcroot.c
Bert Huijben wrote on Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 10:01:18 +0100:
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name]
Sent: donderdag 8 november 2012 08:10
To: dev@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r1406870 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion:
danie...@apache.org wrote on Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 09:03:48 -:
Author: danielsh
Date: Thu Nov 8 09:03:48 2012
New Revision: 1406967
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1406967view=rev
Log:
* roadmap.html: Typo fix
Modified:
On Wednesday 07 November 2012 08:19 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 07:54:33PM +0530, vijay wrote:
Thanks stefan for your detailed review.
I will keep in mind all your review comments. I will correct my
mistakes in future patches.
Attached the updated patch and log message.
Hi, Lieven,
Von: lieven.govae...@gmail.com
[]
5. In one of Philip error-reporting mails, there was mention of a 408
Request Time-out response.
(http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2012-11/0076.shtml).
No idea if the server sends this response because one of the above issues,
or if this has a
Michael Chletsos mpchl...@gmail.com writes:
OK - this should fix your issues, tested on ruby1.9.3 and ruby1.8.7 -
passed for me, let me know what you get.
That works for me. It needs a log message before it can be committed.
If you want to write it look at some old log messages and
Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl writes:
+1 on not allowing to change the symlinkness of existing files.
And +1 on still allowing it on *new* files.
In the update editor we could change the behavior of incoming symlink
changes to be handled as a delete + add, introducing a tree conflict
(and a
On Wednesday 07 November 2012 08:57 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 3:02 PM, vijay vi...@collab.net
mailto:vi...@collab.net wrote:
On Tuesday 06 November 2012 08:09 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 5:24 PM, vijay vi...@collab.net
Philip,
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Philip Martin
philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote:
Lieven Govaerts l...@mobsol.be writes:
Philip or Ben, can you test that with this patch svn will always stop
with a communication error?
Using serf 1.1.x patched and Subversion 1406366 I get this new
Hi Markus,
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Markus Schaber m.scha...@codesys.com wrote:
Hi, Lieven,
Von: lieven.govae...@gmail.com
[]
5. In one of Philip error-reporting mails, there was mention of a 408
Request Time-out response.
(http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2012-11/0076.shtml).
Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl writes:
In the update editor we could change the behavior of incoming symlink
changes to be handled as a delete + add, introducing a tree conflict
(and a local replacement of the incoming node to keep the original
state) if there are local changes.
I think I
Lieven Govaerts l...@apache.org writes:
Any truncated response should now result in an error from serf (since
serf trunk r1678). It's not clear to me if this error
SERF_ERROR_TRUNCATED_HTTP_RESPONSE was returned from serf but then
ignored in svn, or not returned at all.
I was using 1.1.x
Hi, Lieven,
Von: lieven.govae...@gmail.com [mailto:lieven.govae...@gmail.com] Im
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Markus Schaber m.scha...@codesys.com
wrote:
Von: lieven.govae...@gmail.com
[]
5. In one of Philip error-reporting mails, there was mention of a
408 Request Time-out
On 5 nov 2012, at 09:11, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 05.11.2012 00:21, Thomas Åkesson wrote:
I did some tests with curl --head just as a sanity check. It seems to be a
good choice for access control. I primarily wanted to see that HEAD requests
were not allowed in situations where GET is not
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 05:04:35PM +0530, vijay wrote:
On Wednesday 07 November 2012 08:57 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
* result of ls on a sub-folder results in less output
$svn ls $URL/sub1 -R --include-externals
fileA
fileB
Desired output:
fileA
fileB
subsub
Paul Burba wrote:
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Paul Burba wrote:
What about all these two XFailing tests?
merge_automatic_tests.py 16 'cherry2_fwd'
merge_automatic_tests.py 17 'cherry3_fwd
Are you working on those? Are they blockers for 1.8? Any existing
issue they can be
On 5 nov 2012, at 00:21, Thomas Åkesson wrote:
I have meant to set up a test server with our reference configuration to
validate the patch under realistic circumstances. Unfortunately, the SLES
activation servers have been down for several hours (we don't have dev tools
on our VM
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Julian Foad julianf...@btopenworld.com wrote:
Paul Burba wrote:
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Paul Burba wrote:
What about all these two XFailing tests?
merge_automatic_tests.py 16 'cherry2_fwd'
merge_automatic_tests.py 17 'cherry3_fwd
Are you
-Original Message-
From: phi...@apache.org [mailto:phi...@apache.org]
Sent: donderdag 8 november 2012 16:27
To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
Subject: svn commit: r1407127 - /subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS
Author: philip
Date: Thu Nov 8 15:26:37 2012
New Revision: 1407127
-Original Message-
From: Philip Martin [mailto:philip.mar...@wandisco.com]
Sent: donderdag 8 november 2012 13:31
To: Bert Huijben
Cc: 'Daniel Shahaf'; dev@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r1406870 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion:
libsvn_wc/update_editor.c
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl wrote:
-Original Message-
From: phi...@apache.org [mailto:phi...@apache.org]
Sent: donderdag 8 november 2012 16:27
To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
Subject: svn commit: r1407127 - /subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS
-Original Message-
From: Paul Burba [mailto:ptbu...@gmail.com]
Sent: donderdag 8 november 2012 17:13
To: Bert Huijben
Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r1407127 - /subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl
Thomas Åkesson wrote on Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 15:15:03 +0100:
On 5 nov 2012, at 09:11, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 05.11.2012 00:21, Thomas Åkesson wrote:
I did some tests with curl --head just as a sanity check. It seems to be a
good choice for access control. I primarily wanted to see that
[Daniel Shahaf]
it's what allows Windows users to create versioned symlinks:
printf link bar foo svn add foo svn ps svn:special yes foo svn
ci
If we don't like changing the specialness of a local addition, we could
deprecate (or break) that behaviour and have people run
'svn add
Peter Samuelson wrote on Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 11:01:37 -0600:
[Daniel Shahaf]
it's what allows Windows users to create versioned symlinks:
printf link bar foo svn add foo svn ps svn:special yes foo
svn ci
If we don't like changing the specialness of a local addition, we
Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
But I did run across an assertion in mergeinfo.c, :line 1174
during merge_tests.py 125:
SVN_ERR_ASSERT_NO_RETURN(IS_VALID_FORWARD_RANGE(first));
The weird thing about the assertion is, that the tests
will continue just fine afterwards and no error was
reported. I
Peter Samuelson wrote on Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 11:01:37 -0600:
[Daniel Shahaf]
it's what allows Windows users to create versioned symlinks:
printf link bar foo svn add foo svn ps svn:special yes foo
svn ci
If we don't like changing the specialness of a local addition, we
Initial support for ruby 1.9.3 when creating swig bindings for subversion.
* Makefile.in:
Ruby 1.8 uses --verbose, 1.9 does not for run-test.rb
* subversion/bindings/swig/ruby/test/test_core.rb:
Updated for ruby1.9 time, which uses nanoseconds
*
[Daniel Shahaf]
Did you mean:
$ printf 'link bar' foo
Yes I did mean that - thanks.
$ svn add --config-option config:miscellany:enable-auto-props=yes \
--config-option config:auto-props:foo=svn:special=1 foo
A foo
$ ls -l foo
Thank you!
Ruby community will be excited, I will continue to improve the tests.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 8:29 AM, Philip Martin
philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote:
Michael Chletsos mpchl...@gmail.com writes:
Initial support for ruby 1.9.3 when creating swig bindings for subversion.
I tweaked
Michael Chletsos mpchl...@gmail.com writes:
Initial support for ruby 1.9.3 when creating swig bindings for subversion.
I tweaked the format a little and committed in r1407206. Thanks!
--
Certified Supported Apache Subversion Downloads:
http://www.wandisco.com/subversion/download
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Philip Martin
philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote:
Lieven Govaerts l...@apache.org writes:
Any truncated response should now result in an error from serf (since
serf trunk r1678). It's not clear to me if this error
SERF_ERROR_TRUNCATED_HTTP_RESPONSE was
C-Mike Pilato asks in
http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4239,
Julian, what is the exit criteria for this issue's completion? At what point
do
we call it finished -- or at least finished enough that future improvements
can be tracked as unique issues?
I guess there are two
On 11/08/2012 03:50 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
C-Mike Pilato asks in
http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4239,
Julian, what is the exit criteria for this issue's completion? At what
point do we call it finished -- or at least finished enough that future
improvements can be
Lieven Govaerts l...@apache.org writes:
My expectation is that with serf trunk up to date r1685 you'll now
only see the error The server sent a truncated HTTP response body.
instead of asserts, checksum or other svn errors.
I do see that error:
../src/subversion/svn/checkout-cmd.c:168:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 09:42:34PM -, cmpil...@apache.org wrote:
Author: cmpilato
Date: Thu Nov 8 21:42:34 2012
New Revision: 1407279
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1407279view=rev
Log:
Rather than continue the trend of accumulating new --pre-X.Y-compatible
options to
C. Michael Pilato wrote:
On 11/08/2012 03:50 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
C-Mike Pilato asks in
http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4239,
Julian, what is the exit criteria for this issue's completion?
At what point do we call it finished -- or at least finished
enough that
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 7:30 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann
stefan.fuhrm...@wandisco.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann
stefan.fuhrm...@wandisco.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 2:00 AM, Johan Corveleyn
40 matches
Mail list logo
