Giving some more details about this particular commit:
On 01/12/2017 23:55, luke1...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: luke1410
> Date: Fri Dec 1 22:55:51 2017
> New Revision: 1816926
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1816926&view=rev
> Log:
> * site/staging/docs/community-guide/mailing-lists.p
On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 7:13 PM, Nathan Hartman wrote:
> On Dec 1, 2017, at 5:38 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>>
>>> On 01.12.2017 13:16, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>>> Great! I gather from the reactions in this thread that we have
>>> consensus on the principle, we "just" need to do it :-). And figure
>>>
On Dec 1, 2017, at 5:38 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>
>> On 01.12.2017 13:16, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> Great! I gather from the reactions in this thread that we have
>> consensus on the principle, we "just" need to do it :-). And figure
>> out some details.
>
> Will that be Subversion 18.04 Anticli
On 12/1/2017 5:07 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Stefan wrote:
On 24/11/2017 12:25, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 24.11.2017 12:20, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
At the hackathon we (me, Stefan Hett, Stefan Fuhrmann, Bert, Julian)
discussed migrating our wiki from the current M
Johan Corveleyn wrote:
I've tried to get a list of all our current wiki pages. [...]
Thanks for the progress update.
I notice there are several "orphaned" pages that are useful. For
example, "Berlin2015" was orphaned; I have just linked it from "Meetings".
Since I like history (I'm interes
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Stefan wrote:
> On 24/11/2017 12:25, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 24.11.2017 12:20, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>>> At the hackathon we (me, Stefan Hett, Stefan Fuhrmann, Bert, Julian)
>>> discussed migrating our wiki from the current MoinMoin
>>> (wiki.apache.org/subversi
6 month
2 year LTS
On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 7:38 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 01.12.2017 13:16, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> > Great! I gather from the reactions in this thread that we have
> > consensus on the principle, we "just" need to do it :-). And figure
> > out some details.
>
> Will that be S
On 01.12.2017 13:16, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> Great! I gather from the reactions in this thread that we have
> consensus on the principle, we "just" need to do it :-). And figure
> out some details.
Will that be Subversion 18.04 Anticlimactic Albatross?
-- Brane
Great! I gather from the reactions in this thread that we have
consensus on the principle, we "just" need to do it :-). And figure
out some details.
- WC multiple format support: we're okay for now (1.8 - 1.10 have the
same format), but for 1.11 it would be good if we can make
better-pristines hap
Stefan wrote:
Good catch. Just verified that the subversion mailing lists are still
archived and accessible via the NNTP. I'll simply update the links to
the nntp ones instead. Or would anyoneobject?
I am very grateful to you for doing this maintenance. No objection here!
- Julian
10 matches
Mail list logo