RE: svn log --ignore-properties option

2013-09-26 Thread Mark Moe
This has caused significant performance issues especially with svn log. There reasoning was if they could ignore properties this would help combat these performance issues. Does this make sense? This sounds as if the performance issue was on the server side. We found that about half

RE: Provide a svn log -v with the option to filter out changeset's

2013-08-23 Thread Mark Moe
That would be very useful to be able to show-paths just for the target and control the depth. Thanks, - Mark -Original Message- From: Julian Foad [mailto:julianf...@btopenworld.com] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2013 5:48 AM To: Ben Reser Cc: Patrick Sawyer; dev@subversion.apache.org;

RE: svn commit: r1398389 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: include/ libsvn_client/ libsvn_subr/ libsvn_wc/ svn/ tests/libsvn_wc/

2012-10-16 Thread Mark Moe
Would it be possible for the blocked read operations to hang for a configured X number of seconds (maybe with a waiting X seconds for exclusive-mode lock to free up message)? This would be useful for both (1) waiting just a little bit of time to prevent unnecessary failure errors and (2)

RE: [Issue 4124] New - Give servers sufficient means to disallow commits from clients based on version numbers

2012-08-20 Thread Mark Moe
Now, if we can find a way to expose the revprops to the start-commit hook, all three RA layers should be able to provide early detection of commits that would fail in pre-commit for revprop-related reasons. (And we should consider this independently of the whole client-version capability

Re: svn_fs/svn_repo repository lock API

2012-08-08 Thread Mark Moe
This would be useful for our us too. I would add freeze to the start and unfreeze to the end of the script we use to rsync a copy of our repo (and associated files) to an off-site network share. Thanks, - Mark

RE: Status of trunk

2012-06-21 Thread Mark Moe
Can/should we focus on fixing these and shipping sooner rather than later? Are there items that should/must go into 1.8 that aren't on deck today? I would really like to see #4176 resolved in v1.7.x or v1.8.x. It's a major issue for us and our usage of svn (wc-ng) working copies on network

svn 1.7.x no longer works for ci (or add) though a link

2012-06-12 Thread Mark Moe
Hi, Subversion 1.7.x appears to no longer support commit (or add) of a file referenced through a symbolic link. Was this change intended or should it still work like it did with v1.6.x? Examples for 1.7.x failing and 1.6.x working shown below. Thanks, - Mark ### 1.7.5 ci though link fails ###

Re: svn 1.7.x no longer works for ci (or add) though a link

2012-06-12 Thread Mark Moe
I created Issue #4193. Thanks. - Mark On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote: On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 09:50:17AM -0500, Mark Moe wrote: Hi, Subversion 1.7.x appears to no longer support commit (or add) of a file referenced through a symbolic link

RE: svn ci performance issue with 1.7.x and nfs mounted working copies

2012-04-30 Thread Mark Moe
This is a big deal for us too. Will there be a configuration setting in an official svn 1.7.x version that we can use to enable the exclusive lock mode for SQLite? (assuming that is a valid fix for this issue) As it is Subversion 1.6 was slow on NFS for us and 1.7 is even worse. But, our IT