On 8.1.2013 21:28, Ben Reser wrote:
I think flat out the problem is that building on Windows is just a
pain. I remember it took me several days to get a working build
environment so I could be the last signature on 1.6.19. Unfortunately
I can't be the last vote on the more recent releases becau
On 14.12.2012 4:21, Branko Čibej wrote:
The only reason for trying for C++11 is, as far as I'm concerned,
getting std::shared_ptr . The C++ bindings I'm slowly wrapping
my head around will need it, and I don't want to even consider using
standard containers without it. The only alternative to C
On 14.12.2011 10:41, Stefan Sperling wrote:
Index: subversion/po/de.po
===
--- subversion/po/de.po (revision 1214015)
+++ subversion/po/de.po (working copy)
@@ -236,9 +236,8 @@ msgid "Invalid character in hex checksum"
msgstr "Ung?
On 10.11.2011 16:21, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
On 11/07/2011 07:14 PM, Miha Vitorovic wrote:
On 7.11.2011 16:08, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
Can you argue up a case where one would want a non-revision-pegged
external
excluded from commit? I'm reluctant to take simply previous externals
behavi
On 7.11.2011 16:08, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
Can you argue up a case where one would want a non-revision-pegged external
excluded from commit? I'm reluctant to take simply previous externals
behavior as argument, because externals have always sucked so far.
I can :)
I spend my days writing "code
On 7.10.2011 11:56, Semen Prikhodko wrote:
Hi guys.
I need to add additional functionality to Subversion. My task is to
make SVN able to insert special "watermarks" into working copy source
files which identify a developer working on them. This means every
source file will contain some ident
On 8.8.2011 11:13, Julian Foad wrote:
The other day I noticed that the 'svn mergeinfo' command passes
changed the parameter to FALSE and found that the result was actually
slower. Looking further now, I see that the result is different.
with svn_client_mergeinfo_log(discover_changed_paths=TR
Well, I'm not a developer, but I'd just like to point out that
http://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/mailing-lists.html
explicitly states: "Please do /not/ post to dev@ as a last resort after
failing to get an answer on users@."
Thanks and best regards, Miha
On 26.3.2011 17:01, Ro
Ann,
I am a Windows user, and I agree that such a feature shouldn't go into
the codebase. Many such features are traditionally solved using
scripting, and while scripting on unix used to be much more powerful
than on windows, this is no longer true for many years now. Instead of
creating a
On 13.4.2010 19:32, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
Bolstridge, Andrew wrote:
To get new developers, I think the first thing that needs to be done
is to make entry easier. That means providing a setup ready-to-debug
for people. The initial
On 12/28/2009 01:03 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 12:21:34PM +0100, Miha Vitorovic wrote:
I'm just a lurker, so my apologies if I'm missing something obvious,
but isn't it much simpler to support client side hooks on a Windows
only client (like Tort
On 12/28/2009 12:13 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 06:38:32AM +0100, Branko Čibej wrote:
Stefan Sperling wrote:
Client-side hooks can do very interesting things.
I've seen people pick TortoiseSVN as their only client because it has this
feature. Just like server-si
12 matches
Mail list logo
