Re: [PATCH] Re: Patch ping, 5 years later: removing properties

2012-02-02 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 12:12:39PM -0800, Alexey Neyman wrote: > Hi Stefan, > > Oops, I forgot to send it out after applying the feedback comments. Nothing > to > be sorry about. Here it is, updated to apply to r1239239. Thanks! Committed in r1239553. I'll make some more follow-up tweaks, but

Re: [PATCH] Re: Patch ping, 5 years later: removing properties

2012-02-01 Thread Alexey Neyman
Hi Stefan, Oops, I forgot to send it out after applying the feedback comments. Nothing to be sorry about. Here it is, updated to apply to r1239239. [[[ * subversion/svn/cl.h * subversion/svn/main.c New options, --no-diff-properties and --patch for svn diff. * subversion/include/svn_client.h

Re: [PATCH] Re: Patch ping, 5 years later: removing properties

2012-02-01 Thread Stefan Sperling
Alexey, are you still working on this patch? Since your last submission there has been some feedback and I think we've reached consensus. I am sorry that our discussion flip-flopped a little and mislead you. I would very much like to see a version of your patch which incorporates the feedback yo

Re: [PATCH] Re: Patch ping, 5 years later: removing properties

2011-12-22 Thread Julian Foad
Stefan Sperling wrote: > Alexey Neyman wrote: >> Stefan Sperling wrote: >>> I'd prefer keeping --no-diff-properties and add a --patch option >>> later which implies --no-diff-properties and maybe other options. >> >> I was explicitly asked by Julian Foad to avoid adding more >> low-level opti

Re: [PATCH] Re: Patch ping, 5 years later: removing properties

2011-12-21 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 12/21/2011 02:32 PM, Alexey Neyman wrote: > I am a bit confused here. The comment for svn_client_diff6 says "New in 1.8", > and 1.8 is not released yes, is it? I thought that non-released API is > subject > to change. If it is not the case, I'll create another wrapper. You are correct. If t

Re: [PATCH] Re: Patch ping, 5 years later: removing properties

2011-12-21 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:32:43AM -0800, Alexey Neyman wrote: > Hi Stefan, > > Thanks for a review. A few questions: > > On Wednesday, December 21, 2011 03:44:07 am Stefan Sperling wrote: > > I'd prefer keeping --no-diff-properties and add a --patch option later > > which implies --no-diff-prope

Re: [PATCH] Re: Patch ping, 5 years later: removing properties

2011-12-21 Thread Alexey Neyman
Hi Stefan, Thanks for a review. A few questions: On Wednesday, December 21, 2011 03:44:07 am Stefan Sperling wrote: > I'd prefer keeping --no-diff-properties and add a --patch option later > which implies --no-diff-properties and maybe other options. I was explicitly asked by Julian Foad to avoi

Re: [PATCH] Re: Patch ping, 5 years later: removing properties

2011-12-21 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 04:09:51PM -0800, Alexey Neyman wrote: > On Sunday, November 06, 2011 10:27:01 am Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Perhaps the solution is to make 'svn diff' use --diff-cmd for propdiffs > > too? It seems that currently --diff-cmd is only used for file content > > diffs. > > I gue

Re: [PATCH] Re: Patch ping, 5 years later: removing properties

2011-11-16 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Alexey Neyman wrote on Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 16:09:51 -0800: > On Sunday, November 06, 2011 10:27:01 am Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Perhaps the solution is to make 'svn diff' use --diff-cmd for propdiffs > > too? It seems that currently --diff-cmd is only used for file content > > diffs. > > I guess

[PATCH] Re: Patch ping, 5 years later: removing properties

2011-11-16 Thread Alexey Neyman
On Sunday, November 06, 2011 10:27:01 am Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Perhaps the solution is to make 'svn diff' use --diff-cmd for propdiffs > too? It seems that currently --diff-cmd is only used for file content > diffs. I guess this is sort of a feature. As Julian pointed out, the property diffs ar