Hi,
This patch adds a testcase for the regression triggered by r917523 and
fixes it.
The revision r917523 do some url-encodings to the paths and uris in
subversion/mod_dav_svn/mirror.c.
$svn log -r917523
r917523 | kam
Thanks for the Patch Vijay.
In my FC14 your testcase passes both with and without patch.
I am investigating
Will get back.
With regards
Kamesh Jayachandran
On 03/24/2011 04:11 PM, vijay wrote:
Hi,
This patch adds a testcase for the regression triggered by r917523 and
fixes it.
The rev
Just now I came to know that it fails in neon only.
I configured neon as a default ra_layer in my runtime configuration area.
When I use serf as ra_layer, the commit succeeds.
Thanks & Regards,
vijayaguru
On Thursday 24 March 2011 05:12 PM, Kamesh Jayachandran wrote:
Thanks for the Patch Vija
On 03/24/2011 05:54 PM, vijay wrote:
Just now I came to know that it fails in neon only.
I configured neon as a default ra_layer in my runtime configuration area.
When I use serf as ra_layer, the commit succeeds.
Yes that answers the failure I observed.
Please provide a testcase that exhibit
>
> DAV svn
> SVNParentPath /repositories
>
>
> DAV svn
> SVNParentPath /repositories-slave
> SVNMasterURI "http://localhost/svn 1"
>
That seems like an incorrect configuration. The SVNMasterURI, like any
other URI, should not have an unescaped space in it.
I don't know if that ch
On Thursday 24 March 2011 10:09 PM, Peter Samuelson wrote:
DAV svn
SVNParentPath /repositories
DAV svn
SVNParentPath /repositories-slave
SVNMasterURI "http://localhost/svn 1"
That seems like an incorrect configuration. The SVNMasterURI, like any
other URI, should not have an
On Thursday 24 March 2011 07:41 PM, Kamesh Jayachandran wrote:
On 03/24/2011 05:54 PM, vijay wrote:
Just now I came to know that it fails in neon only.
I configured neon as a default ra_layer in my runtime configuration
area.
When I use serf as ra_layer, the commit succeeds.
Yes that answe
Thanks Vijay for the detailed summary and the fix.
I committed it at r1088602.
With regards
Kamesh Jayachandran
On 04/04/2011 12:00 PM, vijay wrote:
On Thursday 24 March 2011 07:41 PM, Kamesh Jayachandran wrote:
On 03/24/2011 05:54 PM, vijay wrote:
Just now I came to know that it fails in neo
8 matches
Mail list logo