On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 06:05:22PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 03:54:13PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
Subversion-1.6.18 tarballs are now available for testing/signing by
committers. To obtain them please check out a working copy from
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 6:03 AM, Stefan Sperling s...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 06:05:22PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 03:54:13PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
Subversion-1.6.18 tarballs are now available for testing/signing by
committers. To obtain
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 5:03 AM, Stefan Sperling s...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 06:05:22PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 03:54:13PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
Subversion-1.6.18 tarballs are now available for testing/signing by
committers. To obtain
-Original Message-
From: Hyrum K Wright [mailto:hyrum.wri...@wandisco.com]
Sent: dinsdag 10 april 2012 15:39
To: dev@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: 1.6.18 tarballs up for testing/signing
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 5:03 AM, Stefan Sperling s...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 05
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 03:54:13PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
Subversion-1.6.18 tarballs are now available for testing/signing by
committers. To obtain them please check out a working copy from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
Please add your signatures to the .asc
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Stefan Sperling s...@apache.org wrote:
Subversion-1.6.18 tarballs are now available for testing/signing by
committers. To obtain them please check out a working copy from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
Please add your signatures to the .asc
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 01:41:50PM -0400, Greg Stein wrote:
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 07:04, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote:
...
Maybe this is not important and I'll just leave this as it is and
mention the problem as a known test suite issue with APR 1.4.6 in
the release notes.
+1
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 03:54:13PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
Subversion-1.6.18 tarballs are now available for testing/signing by
committers. To obtain them please check out a working copy from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
Please add your signatures to the .asc
On 03/29/2012 09:10 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 03:54:13PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
Subversion-1.6.18 tarballs are now available for testing/signing by
committers. To obtain them please check out a working copy from
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 09:13:48AM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
On 03/29/2012 09:10 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 03:54:13PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
Subversion-1.6.18 tarballs are now available for testing/signing by
committers. To obtain them please check out
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote:
It seems I've caused some confusion. Sorry about that.
All part of the RM hazing process. :)
-Hyrum
--
uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy
http://www.uberSVN.com/
On 03/29/2012 06:10 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 03:54:13PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
Subversion-1.6.18 tarballs are now available for testing/signing by
committers. To obtain them please check out a working copy from
On 03/29/2012 09:10 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 03:54:13PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
Subversion-1.6.18 tarballs are now available for testing/signing by
committers. To obtain them please check out a working copy from
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 11:44:08AM -0700, Blair Zajac wrote:
The tar and zip deps are different, zip appears to contain apr 1.4.5
and the tar contains apr 1.4.6. I suggest unpacking both and doing
a diff -rwu, there's some other differences also, such as a missing
apr-iconv in the zip.
On 03/29/2012 11:44 AM, Blair Zajac wrote:
On 03/29/2012 06:10 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 03:54:13PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
Subversion-1.6.18 tarballs are now available for testing/signing by
committers. To obtain them please check out a working copy from
Summary:
+1 to release
Platform:
Linux (Debian/squeeze)
Tested:
(local, svn, svn+sasl, serf, neon) x (fsfs, fsfs/pack/shard, bdb)
(serf/v1, neon/v1) x (fsfs, bdb)
swig-pl, swig-py, swig-rb
javahl x (fsfs, bdb)
Results:
All tests PASS
Local dependencies Debian:
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 07:04, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote:
...
Maybe this is not important and I'll just leave this as it is and
mention the problem as a known test suite issue with APR 1.4.6 in
the release notes.
+1 to this approach.
Packagers who worry about the test failures can
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 01:17:17PM -0700, Blair Zajac wrote:
On 03/24/2012 03:13 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 03:54:13PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
Since this is a 1.6.x release there are -dep tarballs
which should also be signed by those who test them.
I've run a
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 03:54:13PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
Since this is a 1.6.x release there are -dep tarballs
which should also be signed by those who test them.
I've run a test build with these dependencies on a Debian Linux system.
I made a slight mistake by putting APR 1.4.6 into
On 03/24/2012 03:13 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 03:54:13PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
Since this is a 1.6.x release there are -dep tarballs
which should also be signed by those who test them.
I've run a test build with these dependencies on a Debian Linux system.
I
Blair Zajac wrote on Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 13:17:17 -0700:
BTW, any chance of getting the new svnadmin verify work into 1.6.x? I
was thinking it may be worth cutting .19 just to get that in as people
may want to easily know if they have an issue with their repositories.
That work hasn't
On 03/24/2012 01:40 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Blair Zajac wrote on Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 13:17:17 -0700:
BTW, any chance of getting the new svnadmin verify work into 1.6.x? I
was thinking it may be worth cutting .19 just to get that in as people
may want to easily know if they have an issue with
Blair Zajac wrote on Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 14:00:14 -0700:
On 03/24/2012 01:40 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Blair Zajac wrote on Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 13:17:17 -0700:
BTW, any chance of getting the new svnadmin verify work into 1.6.x? I
was thinking it may be worth cutting .19 just to get that in
Subversion-1.6.18 tarballs are now available for testing/signing by
committers. To obtain them please check out a working copy from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
Please add your signatures to the .asc files there.
You can use the release.py script for this:
release.py
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Stefan Sperling s...@apache.org wrote:
Subversion-1.6.18 tarballs are now available for testing/signing by
committers. To obtain them please check out a working copy from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
Please add your signatures to the
25 matches
Mail list logo
