Re: Announcing MaxSVN

an Corveleyn <jcor...@gmail.com>; Bert Huijben <b...@qqmail.nl>; Subversion Development <dev@subversion.apache.org> Subject: Re: Announcing MaxSVN On 24 September 2015 at 00:38, Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote: [...] I think it's useful to have the "latest

Re: Announcing MaxSVN

On 24 September 2015 at 00:38, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Evgeny Kotkov wrote on Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 21:12:19 +0300: >> Stefan Hett writes: [..] >> So, why not have a scheme that uses tag names when you build from a tag, >> branch names when you build

RE: Announcing MaxSVN

yn <jcor...@gmail.com>; Bert Huijben > <b...@qqmail.nl>; Subversion Development <dev@subversion.apache.org> > Subject: Re: Announcing MaxSVN > > On 24 September 2015 at 00:38, Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name> > wrote: > > Evgeny Kotkov wrote

Re: Announcing MaxSVN

On 21/09/2015 23:10, Daniel Shahaf wrote: Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 00:00:42 +0200: On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Stefan wrote: On 19/09/2015 22:48, Johan Corveleyn wrote: On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 10:14 PM, Stefan wrote: I was just

Re: Announcing MaxSVN

Evgeny Kotkov wrote on Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 21:12:19 +0300: > Stefan Hett writes: > > > So unless some new arguments will influence my mind again, this is the > > version scheme I'd aim for: > > (magic numbers are temporary, I didn't quite check them yet) > > > > MaxSVN 1.7.22.1

Re: Announcing MaxSVN

Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 00:00:42 +0200: > On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Stefan wrote: > > On 19/09/2015 22:48, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > >> > >> On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 10:14 PM, Stefan wrote: > >>> > >>> On 19/09/2015 22:00, Johan

Re: Announcing MaxSVN

On 19/09/2015 22:23, Branko Čibej wrote: On 19.09.2015 22:14, Stefan wrote: On 19/09/2015 22:00, Johan Corveleyn wrote: On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 9:44 PM, Stefan wrote: For once this is not a major concern for MaxSVN, since this aims purely for development/testing and not

Re: Announcing MaxSVN

On 19.09.2015 22:43, Stefan wrote: > On 19/09/2015 22:23, Branko Čibej wrote: >> On 19.09.2015 22:14, Stefan wrote: >>> On 19/09/2015 22:00, Johan Corveleyn wrote: On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 9:44 PM, Stefan wrote: > For once this is not a major concern for MaxSVN, since

Re: Announcing MaxSVN

se. Bert From: Stefan <mailto:luke1...@gmx.de> Sent: ‎19-‎9-‎2015 18:12 To: Evgeny Kotkov <mailto:evgeny.kot...@visualsvn.com> Cc: Ivan Zhakov <mailto:i...@visualsvn.com>; Subversion Development <mailto:dev@subversion.apache.org> Subject: Re: Announcing MaxSVN On 19/

Re: Announcing MaxSVN

On 19/09/2015 23:11, Branko Čibej wrote: On 19.09.2015 22:43, Stefan wrote: On 19/09/2015 22:23, Branko Čibej wrote: Nothing would speak from my side against using that scheme, if that would solve all the concerns also the others have. I just got the idea that Johan's concern would not be

RE: Announcing MaxSVN

- From: "Stefan" <luke1...@gmx.de> Sent: ‎19-‎9-‎2015 18:12 To: "Evgeny Kotkov" <evgeny.kot...@visualsvn.com> Cc: "Ivan Zhakov" <i...@visualsvn.com>; "Subversion Development" <dev@subversion.apache.org> Subject: Re: Announcing MaxSVN

Re: Announcing MaxSVN

On 19/09/2015 22:48, Johan Corveleyn wrote: On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 10:14 PM, Stefan wrote: On 19/09/2015 22:00, Johan Corveleyn wrote: ... So what is your suggesting then? I doubt that adding a "-dev" suffix to the version number (which is only recorded in the bugtracker

Re: Announcing MaxSVN

On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 9:44 PM, Stefan wrote: > For once this is not a major concern for MaxSVN, since this aims purely for > development/testing and not actual usage as an SVN client in production > environment. > For 1.10 builds there's also an additional note pointing that

Re: Announcing MaxSVN

On 19/09/2015 22:00, Johan Corveleyn wrote: On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 9:44 PM, Stefan wrote: For once this is not a major concern for MaxSVN, since this aims purely for development/testing and not actual usage as an SVN client in production environment. For 1.10 builds there's

Re: Announcing MaxSVN

First of all thanks for ur input and time Evgeny. Stefan Hett writes: What would u say about this other scheme: 1.9.1.1 -> 1.9.1-1-r1694136-dev 1.9.1.2 -> 1.9.1-2 1.9.2.1 -> 1.9.2-1-r1701493-dev i.e. 1.9.1.2 is a tag-based build on the 1.9.1 branch (therefore it won't suffix

Re: Announcing MaxSVN

On 19/09/2015 16:43, Evgeny Kotkov wrote: Stefan Hett writes: I'd imagine the following style could work (it's related to the version numbering from Visual Assist X (from Wholetomato)): - MaxSVN-1.9.1-x64 (build 1) - MaxSVN-1.9.2-dev-r1701493-x64 (build 1) -

Re: Announcing MaxSVN

Stefan Hett writes: > You are absolutely right here and I should have seen that before. Didn't > take that (obvious) point into account at all. > > I'll come-up with a working version scheme which won't have potential for > causing this misinterpretation and will make sure that

Re: Announcing MaxSVN

Stefan Hett writes: > I'd imagine the following style could work (it's related to the version > numbering from Visual Assist X (from Wholetomato)): > - MaxSVN-1.9.1-x64 (build 1) > - MaxSVN-1.9.2-dev-r1701493-x64 (build 1) > - MaxSVN-1.10.0-dev-r1701493-x64 (build 1) Let me try

Re: Announcing MaxSVN

On 19/09/2015 18:12, Stefan wrote: On 19/09/2015 16:58, Evgeny Kotkov wrote: Stefan Hett writes: You are absolutely right here and I should have seen that before. Didn't take that (obvious) point into account at all. I'll come-up with a working version scheme which won't

Re: Announcing MaxSVN

On 19/09/2015 16:58, Evgeny Kotkov wrote: Stefan Hett writes: You are absolutely right here and I should have seen that before. Didn't take that (obvious) point into account at all. I'll come-up with a working version scheme which won't have potential for causing this

Re: Announcing MaxSVN

On 13 September 2015 at 23:52, Stefan wrote: > Hi Ivan, > Hi Stefan! >> On 7 September 2015 at 18:47, Stefan wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm pleased to announce the availability of a new distribution of SVN >>> called: "MaxSVN". >>> In contrast to other SVN

Re: Announcing MaxSVN

Hi Ivan, On 7 September 2015 at 18:47, Stefan wrote: Hi, I'm pleased to announce the availability of a new distribution of SVN called: "MaxSVN". In contrast to other SVN distributions this one is a bit different since it aims towards being used primarily to support SVN

Re: Announcing MaxSVN

Stefan Hett writes: > What would u say about this other scheme: > 1.9.1.1 -> 1.9.1-1-r1694136-dev > 1.9.1.2 -> 1.9.1-2 > 1.9.2.1 -> 1.9.2-1-r1701493-dev > > i.e. 1.9.1.2 is a tag-based build on the 1.9.1 branch (therefore it won't > suffix the revision number and dev suffix). >

Re: Announcing MaxSVN

Hi Ivan, On 7 September 2015 at 18:47, Stefan wrote: Hi, I'm pleased to announce the availability of a new distribution of SVN called: "MaxSVN". In contrast to other SVN distributions this one is a bit different since it aims towards being used primarily to support SVN

Re: Announcing MaxSVN

On 7 September 2015 at 18:47, Stefan wrote: > Hi, > > I'm pleased to announce the availability of a new distribution of SVN > called: "MaxSVN". > In contrast to other SVN distributions this one is a bit different since it > aims towards being used primarily to support SVN

Announcing MaxSVN

Hi, as suggested by danielsh when talking about MaxSVN, I also take the chance to announce MaxSVN hereby on the dev list quickly because this distribution is mainly focusing to help with SVN development/testing itself. The full announcement is on the users list "Announcing M