On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
...
>> I think we should just generalize this section.
>>
>> There are DST rule changes around the world at least every year -commonly
>> more
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Bert Huijben <b...@qqmail.nl> wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: vrijdag 24 juni 2016 01:10
>> To: Subversion Development <dev@subversion.apache.o
> -Original Message-
> From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com]
> Sent: vrijdag 24 juni 2016 01:10
> To: Subversion Development <dev@subversion.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: Cleaning up the FAQ
>
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 12:33 AM, Johan Corveleyn
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 12:33 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
...
> Hm, I think I'll go for stsp's suggestion, to move deprecated
> questions to the bottom, but keep everything on one page.
>
> Something like this:
> -
> For questions related to deprecated SVN versions, click
On 6/23/2016 00:33, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Stefan Hett wrote:
>> On 6/22/2016 1:38 AM, Mark Phippard wrote:
>>>
On Jun 21, 2016, at 7:20 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
[...]
2) Remove some questions that
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Stefan Hett wrote:
> On 6/22/2016 1:38 AM, Mark Phippard wrote:
>>
>> Sounds good in general, but would it be better to just create a new page
>> and leave existing one in tact so that links to entries all remain
>> functional?
>>
>> Also, it
On 6/22/2016 1:38 AM, Mark Phippard wrote:
Sounds good in general, but would it be better to just create a new page and
leave existing one in tact so that links to entries all remain functional?
Also, it might be a better question for users@ list. I cannot think of any
reason for a dev to
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 01:20:21AM +0200, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> 1) Move anything only relevant to old releases (anything < 1.9 or <
> 1.8 (?)) to a separate page (faq_old.html or something -- linked from
> the main faq with a link somewhere at the top "Questions about older
> releases").
Or
Sounds good in general, but would it be better to just create a new page and
leave existing one in tact so that links to entries all remain functional?
Also, it might be a better question for users@ list. I cannot think of any
reason for a dev to object to someone who wants to put in the
I think our FAQ is a bit of a mess (with all due respect to the people
who have contributed to it over the years -- time has just taken its
toll). Some questions are no longer relevant for recent releases (e.g.
documented workarounds for problems that have since been fixed; or
referring to BDB or
10 matches
Mail list logo