Re: Cleaning up the FAQ

2016-06-25 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Bert Huijben wrote: ... >> I think we should just generalize this section. >> >> There are DST rule changes around the world at least every year -commonly >> more

Re: Cleaning up the FAQ

2016-06-24 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Bert Huijben <b...@qqmail.nl> wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com] >> Sent: vrijdag 24 juni 2016 01:10 >> To: Subversion Development <dev@subversion.apache.o

RE: Cleaning up the FAQ

2016-06-24 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com] > Sent: vrijdag 24 juni 2016 01:10 > To: Subversion Development <dev@subversion.apache.org> > Subject: Re: Cleaning up the FAQ > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 12:33 AM, Johan Corveleyn

Re: Cleaning up the FAQ

2016-06-23 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 12:33 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote: ... > Hm, I think I'll go for stsp's suggestion, to move deprecated > questions to the bottom, but keep everything on one page. > > Something like this: > - > For questions related to deprecated SVN versions, click

Re: Cleaning up the FAQ

2016-06-22 Thread Stefan
On 6/23/2016 00:33, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Stefan Hett wrote: >> On 6/22/2016 1:38 AM, Mark Phippard wrote: >>> On Jun 21, 2016, at 7:20 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote: [...] 2) Remove some questions that

Re: Cleaning up the FAQ

2016-06-22 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Stefan Hett wrote: > On 6/22/2016 1:38 AM, Mark Phippard wrote: >> >> Sounds good in general, but would it be better to just create a new page >> and leave existing one in tact so that links to entries all remain >> functional? >> >> Also, it

Re: Cleaning up the FAQ

2016-06-22 Thread Stefan Hett
On 6/22/2016 1:38 AM, Mark Phippard wrote: Sounds good in general, but would it be better to just create a new page and leave existing one in tact so that links to entries all remain functional? Also, it might be a better question for users@ list. I cannot think of any reason for a dev to

Re: Cleaning up the FAQ

2016-06-22 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 01:20:21AM +0200, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > 1) Move anything only relevant to old releases (anything < 1.9 or < > 1.8 (?)) to a separate page (faq_old.html or something -- linked from > the main faq with a link somewhere at the top "Questions about older > releases"). Or

Re: Cleaning up the FAQ

2016-06-21 Thread Mark Phippard
Sounds good in general, but would it be better to just create a new page and leave existing one in tact so that links to entries all remain functional? Also, it might be a better question for users@ list. I cannot think of any reason for a dev to object to someone who wants to put in the

Cleaning up the FAQ

2016-06-21 Thread Johan Corveleyn
I think our FAQ is a bit of a mess (with all due respect to the people who have contributed to it over the years -- time has just taken its toll). Some questions are no longer relevant for recent releases (e.g. documented workarounds for problems that have since been fixed; or referring to BDB or