On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
>
> I think we have in consistent python indentation. I can see that we use
> 2 space in test/ and 4 in bindings/ctypes-python. Is it not a good idea
> to stick to common indentation? I can fix it. Fixing ctypes-python
> will be easier bec
On 21.02.2011 11:20, Philip Martin wrote:
> Noorul Islam K M writes:
>
>> I think we have in consistent python indentation. I can see that we use
>> 2 space in test/ and 4 in bindings/ctypes-python. Is it not a good idea
>> to stick to common indentation? I can fix it. Fixing ctypes-python
>> wi
Noorul Islam K M writes:
> I think we have in consistent python indentation. I can see that we use
> 2 space in test/ and 4 in bindings/ctypes-python. Is it not a good idea
> to stick to common indentation? I can fix it. Fixing ctypes-python
> will be easier because it has less number of lines.
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 03:26:26PM +0530, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
>
> I think we have in consistent python indentation. I can see that we use
> 2 space in test/ and 4 in bindings/ctypes-python. Is it not a good idea
> to stick to common indentation? I can fix it. Fixing ctypes-python
> will be e
I think we have in consistent python indentation. I can see that we use
2 space in test/ and 4 in bindings/ctypes-python. Is it not a good idea
to stick to common indentation? I can fix it. Fixing ctypes-python
will be easier because it has less number of lines.
Any thoughts? Or is it already k
5 matches
Mail list logo