Re: Performance branch - svnserve crash in fs_history_prev

2010-08-25 Thread Stefan Fuhrmann
Johan Corveleyn wrote: Hi, I've taken the performance branch for a spin. Some of performance increases are awesome (svn log is ~4 times faster on my machine (tested with a file with 300 revisions)). Try playing with the -c, -F and -M parameters. They should yield result in even better

Re: Performance branch - svnserve crash in fs_history_prev

2010-08-25 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann stefanfuhrm...@alice-dsl.de wrote: Johan Corveleyn wrote: However, I also experienced a crash of svnserve, for both svn log and svn blame of a big file with 2000 revisions (so this is quite an extreme case). See both .log files in attachment.

Performance branch - svnserve crash in fs_history_prev

2010-08-23 Thread Johan Corveleyn
Hi, I've taken the performance branch for a spin. Some of performance increases are awesome (svn log is ~4 times faster on my machine (tested with a file with 300 revisions)). However, I also experienced a crash of svnserve, for both svn log and svn blame of a big file with 2000 revisions (so

Re: Performance branch - svnserve crash in fs_history_prev

2010-08-23 Thread Lieven Govaerts
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I've taken the performance branch for a spin. Some of performance increases are awesome (svn log is ~4 times faster on my machine (tested with a file with 300 revisions)). However, I also experienced a crash of

Re: Performance branch - svnserve crash in fs_history_prev

2010-08-23 Thread Johan Corveleyn
Trying again with .txt extension added. Johan On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Julian Foad julian.f...@wandisco.com wrote: On Mon, 2010-08-23, Lieven Govaerts wrote: Either you forgot the attachments, or they were dropped by our mailing sw. Try adding a .txt extension. AFAIK, the mailing