On Wed Aug 21 10:44:52 2013, Patrick Sawyer wrote:
> It could be useful to have a svn -v option that would give the option
> to filter out the changeset to only reflect the changes with respect
> to the file/subdir you run the command on.
>
> Users performing a log may not care about the rest of th
Ben Reser wrote:
> On Wed Aug 21 10:44:52 2013, Patrick Sawyer wrote:
>> It could be useful to have a svn -v option that would give the option
>> to filter out the changeset to only reflect the changes with respect
>> to the file/subdir you run the command on.
>>
>> Users performing a log may
Julian Foad writes:
> Ben Reser wrote:
>
>> On Wed Aug 21 10:44:52 2013, Patrick Sawyer wrote:
>>> It could be useful to have a svn -v option that would give the option
>>> to filter out the changeset to only reflect the changes with respect
>>> to the file/subdir you run the command on.
>>>
; Support Team
Subject: Re: Provide a svn log -v with the option to filter out changeset's
I would suggest:
svn log TARGET [SUBTREE...] --depth=D
// report each rev that affects a path within any subtree to depth D
--diff// diff of each subtree, each to depth D
--dif
[Julian Foad]
> svn log TARGET [SUBTREE...]
> --diff// diff of TARGET [SUBTREE...]
> --diff-all// diff of whole commit
> --show-paths // changed-paths for TARGET [SUBTREE...]
> --show-all-paths // changed-paths for whole commit; alias -v
> -v/--verbo
eam
> Sent: Friday, 23 August 2013, 18:58
> Subject: Re: Provide a svn log -v with the option to filter out changeset's
>
>
> [Julian Foad]
>> svn log TARGET [SUBTREE...]
>> --diff // diff of TARGET [SUBTREE...]
>> --diff-all // di
> > +1, except I'd condense --diff-all and --show-all-paths to a single
> > additional option named, I dunno, --full-revision.
[Julian Foad]
> My latest thought in that area is like I listed above except omitting
> the --diff-all option entirely -- after all, nobody has requested it
> and it doe
Peter Samuelson wrote:
>>> +1, except I'd condense --diff-all and --show-all-paths to a single
>>> additional option named, I dunno, --full-revision.
>
> [Julian Foad]
>> My latest thought in that area is like I listed above except omitting
>> the --diff-all option entirely -- after all, nobody h
Thanks all.
So it appears that every one agrees this is a valid improvement. Has this
been raised into your issue tracker and do we have a reference number for
this improvement? Thanks
Regards
Patrick Sawyer | *Deployment Coordinator *
*
*
WANdisco // *Non-Stop Data*
t. +44 (0)114 303 02 5
Patrick Sawyer wrote:
> Thanks all.
>
> So it appears that every one agrees this is a valid improvement. Has
> this been raised into your issue tracker and do we have a reference
> number for this improvement? Thanks
Hi Patrick. I've just filed issue #4419, "Restrict changed-paths list in 'log
10 matches
Mail list logo