On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:28 PM, Lieven Govaerts l...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
we seem to be raising and discussing a few different issues in this
thread. I've tried to summarize current status with some added
observations.
I propose to start up separate mail threads when discussing one of
Hi, Lieven,
Von: lieven.govae...@gmail.com
[]
5. In one of Philip error-reporting mails, there was mention of a 408
Request Time-out response.
(http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2012-11/0076.shtml).
No idea if the server sends this response because one of the above issues,
or if this has a
Philip,
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Philip Martin
philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote:
Lieven Govaerts l...@mobsol.be writes:
Philip or Ben, can you test that with this patch svn will always stop
with a communication error?
Using serf 1.1.x patched and Subversion 1406366 I get this new
Hi Markus,
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Markus Schaber m.scha...@codesys.com wrote:
Hi, Lieven,
Von: lieven.govae...@gmail.com
[]
5. In one of Philip error-reporting mails, there was mention of a 408
Request Time-out response.
(http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2012-11/0076.shtml).
Hi, Lieven,
Von: lieven.govae...@gmail.com [mailto:lieven.govae...@gmail.com] Im
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Markus Schaber m.scha...@codesys.com
wrote:
Von: lieven.govae...@gmail.com
[]
5. In one of Philip error-reporting mails, there was mention of a
408 Request Time-out
Justin Erenkrantz jus...@erenkrantz.com writes:
Sure sounds like an early TCP close causing a lost response. httpd
shouldn't be closing the TCP connection in the middle of the response
as that's not when httpd would evaluate the Timeout directive...but,
if you are going over a loopback
Ivan Zhakov i...@visualsvn.com writes:
Could please test attached serf patch. This patch should fix problem
with reading one connection for long time without reading from other
connections.
I still see assertions with your patch and Lieven's patch together.
--
Certified Supported Apache
On 11/05/2012 08:30 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 1:33 PM, C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.net wrote:
My debugging indicates that when close_all_dirs() is called, there are a
slew of unclosed directories which each have a non-zero ref_count. Save for
the root directory
I worked with Philip today and was able to reproduce the exact problem
he's been seeing. I ended up having to get his full httpd.conf to
figure it out..
Ultimately the problem proved to be that he had this directive:
Timeout 3
Which would mean if we don't tend a connection for 3 seconds Apache
On 11/06/2012 08:29 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
On 11/05/2012 08:30 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 1:33 PM, C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.net
wrote:
My debugging indicates that when close_all_dirs() is called, there are a
slew of unclosed directories which each have
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Lieven Govaerts l...@mobsol.be wrote:
Ben,
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote:
I worked with Philip today and was able to reproduce the exact problem
he's been seeing. I ended up having to get his full httpd.conf to
figure it
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Lieven Govaerts l...@mobsol.be wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Lieven Govaerts l...@mobsol.be wrote:
Ben,
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote:
I worked with Philip today and was able to reproduce the exact problem
he's
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Ivan Zhakov i...@visualsvn.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Lieven Govaerts l...@mobsol.be wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Lieven Govaerts l...@mobsol.be wrote:
Ben,
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote:
I
On 11/06/2012 10:15 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
On 11/06/2012 08:29 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
I recall this patch of yours -- I even asked you about it post-Berlin. I'll
take a look at it now and see if it can help us out.
Not seeing the active_dir_propfinds list corruption you
patch attached
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:45 PM, Lieven Govaerts l...@mobsol.be wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Lieven Govaerts l...@mobsol.be wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Lieven Govaerts l...@mobsol.be wrote:
Ben,
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Ben Reser
Lieven Govaerts l...@mobsol.be writes:
Philip or Ben, can you test that with this patch svn will always stop
with a communication error?
Using serf 1.1.x patched and Subversion 1406366 I get this new error:
Awc/1.3.0-rc1/subversion/libsvn_subr/config.c
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 3:22 PM, C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.net wrote:
On 11/06/2012 10:15 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
On 11/06/2012 08:29 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
I recall this patch of yours -- I even asked you about it post-Berlin. I'll
take a look at it now and see if it can
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Ivan Zhakov i...@visualsvn.com wrote:
Another problem is how serf reads data from network in case of
multiple connections: it reads data from one connection until EAGAIN.
But if data comes from network really fast (from local server for
example) it continue
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 1:41 AM, Ivan Zhakov i...@visualsvn.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Ivan Zhakov i...@visualsvn.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Lieven Govaerts l...@mobsol.be wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Lieven Govaerts l...@mobsol.be wrote:
Ben,
Philip Martin phi...@codematters.co.uk writes:
I've been experimenting checking out subversion/tags from my local
mirror of the Subversion repository using a client and mod_dav_svn from
trunk. I'm getting several different errors seemingly at random, I
suspect they may be related to some
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Philip Martin
philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote:
Philip Martin phi...@codematters.co.uk writes:
I've been experimenting checking out subversion/tags from my local
mirror of the Subversion repository using a client and mod_dav_svn from
trunk. I'm getting
Lieven Govaerts l...@mobsol.be writes:
From your previous report I noticed the 406 response that serf isn't
handling, at least serf doesn't support a response coming in while the
matching request wasn't completely sent yet. I guess that 406 response
was for a REPORT request not flushed fast
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Lieven Govaerts l...@mobsol.be wrote:
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Philip Martin
philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote:
Philip Martin phi...@codematters.co.uk writes:
I've been experimenting checking out subversion/tags from my local
mirror of the Subversion
On 11/05/2012 11:49 AM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Lieven Govaerts l...@mobsol.be wrote:
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Philip Martin
philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote:
Philip Martin phi...@codematters.co.uk writes:
I've been experimenting checking out
On 11/05/2012 01:33 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
On 11/05/2012 11:49 AM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
My current test with svn trunk apache+mod_dav_svn 1.6.12 does not
reproduce this issue.
What I am seeing is that svn is using a lot of memory, up to 1GB.
Currently looking at the root cause
Hi Mike
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 9:39 PM, C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.net wrote:
On 11/05/2012 01:33 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
On 11/05/2012 11:49 AM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
My current test with svn trunk apache+mod_dav_svn 1.6.12 does not
reproduce this issue.
What I am seeing is
On 11/05/2012 04:21 PM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
Do you plan on patching this issue? If yes I can continue looking at
Philip's original issue in this thread - assuming it is not caused by
the memory leak.
Thanks for the helpful cross-checking! Yes, I plan to continue looking into
this issue.
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 1:33 PM, C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.net wrote:
My debugging indicates that when close_all_dirs() is called, there are a
slew of unclosed directories which each have a non-zero ref_count. Save for
the root directory of the edit (/tags), fetch_props == TRUE,
Philip,
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Philip Martin phi...@codematters.co.uk wrote:
I've been experimenting checking out subversion/tags from my local
mirror of the Subversion repository using a client and mod_dav_svn from
trunk. I'm getting several different errors seemingly at random, I
I've been experimenting checking out subversion/tags from my local
mirror of the Subversion repository using a client and mod_dav_svn from
trunk. I'm getting several different errors seemingly at random, I
suspect they may be related to some common underlying problem.
Sometimes I see a checksum
30 matches
Mail list logo
