On 06/13/2011 03:45 AM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> I don't recall if we ran alphas on svn.collab.net during the 1.5 cycle
> (we certainly ran RCs) and running the alphas in production might be a
> bit premature. I'm not yet sure how I personally feel about it, but
> just wanted to know how others fel
Bert Huijben wrote on Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 14:22:51 +0200:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name]
> > Sent: maandag 13 juni 2011 14:22
> > To: Hyrum K Wright
> > Cc: Subversion Development; infrastructure
&g
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name]
> Sent: maandag 13 juni 2011 14:22
> To: Hyrum K Wright
> Cc: Subversion Development; infrastructure
> Subject: Re: Running the 1.7.0 pre-releases on svn.apache.org
>
> We have the opt
We have the option of running alphas on the mirror (harmonia/svn.eu)
while leaving svn-master(eris) on 1.6.x.
The idea being that if eris runs a stable release it would require two
bugs, rather than one, to corrupt both mirrors of a given repository.
Hyrum K Wright wrote on Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 0
Before we moved to the ASF, the Subversion project had a habit of
running our pre-releases on our live repository, and I wonder if there
would be benefits to putting the 1.7.0 alphas on svn.apache.org.
The server-side of 1.7.0 has seen several enhancements, but unlike the
client, where much of the
5 matches
Mail list logo
