Re: [dev][dwm][OT] redundant thread (was: broken gnome (even after reset) after usage of dwm 4.7)

On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 07:20:45PM +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote: Can we try to resist producing so much spam recently? I don't think so. Time to figure out CRM114, I think. We need a suckless spam filter. -- Kris Maglione A smart terminal is not a smartass terminal, but rather a terminal you

Re: [dev][dwm][OT] redundant thread; was broken gnome (even after reset) after usage of dwm 4.7

On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 11:25:18AM +0200, Uriel wrote: Remember that suckless now seems to be full of people that think HTML is a good typesetting system. Depressing, isn't it? I suspect a few of them think the same of OpenOffice. -- Kris Maglione Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability.

Re: [dev][dwm][OT] redundant thread (was: broken gnome (even after reset) after usage of dwm 4.7)

Can we try to resist producing so much spam recently? Thanks, Anselm

[dev] wmii: fullscreen window, new window becomes floating?

Hi, in wmii, let's say I go to a new tag, open a window, make sure it's not floating but rather the default layout. then i fullscreen this window. then i launch a new window (using dmenu or whatever) result: new window opens, but: 1) it's floating 2) it has focus If I then unfloat this window, 2

Re: [dev][dwm][OT] redundant thread (was: broken gnome (even after reset) after usage of dwm 4.7)

My redundancy is better than yours! On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 11:53:15AM +, Martin Swift wrote: > On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 11:25:18AM +0200, Uriel wrote: > > Somebody thought breaking gnome was a problem rather than a feature, > > my comment was *not* universally redundant. > > It's not entirely

Re: [dev][dwm][OT] redundant thread (was: broken gnome (even after reset) after usage of dwm 4.7)

On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 11:25:18AM +0200, Uriel wrote: > Somebody thought breaking gnome was a problem rather than a feature, > my comment was *not* universally redundant. It's not entirely clear what you mean by "universally" redundant. On the other hand, it doesn't really matter. You're wrong an

Re: [dev] [dwm] new release soon?

Hi Ray, 2009/9/20 Ray Kohler : > Anselm, do you plan on tagging dwm 5.7 soon? It seems to me that > there's been enough bugs fixed and sufficiently many third-party > patches that don't apply cleanly any more that it would make sense. > (Or are you planning on finishing the Xinerama rework first?)

Re: [dev] [surf] Scrolling bug

A patch was posted on hackers ml. http://lists.suckless.org/hackers/0909/2178.html L. On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 5:20 PM, joshua shaw wrote: > On 9/18/09, Claudio M. Alessi wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 11:27:41PM +0200, pancake wrote: > >>

Re: [dev][dwm][OT] redundant thread; was broken gnome (even after reset) after usage of dwm 4.7

Somebody thought breaking gnome was a problem rather than a feature, my comment was *not* universally redundant. Remember that suckless now seems to be full of people that think HTML is a good typesetting system. uriel On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 8:44 PM, wrote: > * Kris Maglione [2009-09-19 19:2