Re: [dev] How about sta.li ?

2010-08-01 Thread pancake
Cant this be done with a wraper shellscript ? Messing with gnu ld is like a near death experience. Using r2libs can also be possible.. But would be more complex than a few loc shellscript. That's what libtool does ( between many other silly things) which we dont need, and certainly i woul

Re: [dev] How about sta.li ?

2010-08-01 Thread pancake
I want to say that in latest glibc (see archlinux) many 9base programs cant be executed because of being static. Compiling bionic would be great but I was unAble to workaround their makefiles to do it without the android sdk. Glibc must be avoided as much as possible. Anybody working w bion

Re: [dev] How about sta.li ?

2010-08-01 Thread Ethan Grammatikidis
On 1 Aug 2010, at 8:43, pancake wrote: I want to say that in latest glibc (see archlinux) many 9base programs cant be executed because of being static. Compiling bionic would be great but I was unAble to workaround their makefiles to do it without the android sdk. Glibc must be avoided a

Re: [dev] How about sta.li ? - libc tangent

2010-08-01 Thread Ethan Grammatikidis
On 1 Aug 2010, at 8:43, pancake wrote: I want to say that in latest glibc (see archlinux) many 9base programs cant be executed because of being static. I sent the other mail off & then I thought, are you talking about finding a sane libc for any linux, not just sta.li? I've been thinking

Re: [dev] How about sta.li ?

2010-08-01 Thread Josh Rickmar
On Sun, Aug 01, 2010 at 11:38:14AM +0100, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote: > Agreed, but what about other libcs? I'm astonished glibc has come up > at all. Is dietlibc really that inadequate? Or uclibc? I brought up > dietlibc first because as far as I know it doesn't even have dynamic > linking. If it i

Re: [dev] How about sta.li ? - libc tangent

2010-08-01 Thread Anselm R Garbe
On 1 August 2010 12:35, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote: > On 1 Aug 2010, at 8:43, pancake wrote: > >> I want to say that in latest glibc (see archlinux) many 9base programs >> cant be executed because of being static. > > I sent the other mail off & then I thought, are you talking about finding a > san

Re: [dev] How about sta.li ?

2010-08-01 Thread Anselm R Garbe
On 31 July 2010 22:10, Jens Staal wrote: > Another, sort of related question: how has it worked out with the > static binaries of 9base etc built with bionic? > > I was thinking, perhaps a "static binary repository" could be a good start :) This sounds fairly simple and straightforward as long as

Re: [dev] [wmii] tagging Thunderbird windows

2010-08-01 Thread Kris Maglione
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 03:05:41PM +0200, Thomas Dahms wrote: Hi, I have a rule for Thunderbird "/Thunderbird/ tags=netz". I composed a message, which opens a new window. Then I tagged this new window "+something" to have it also on another tag. Later I sent the mail, which closed that window. N

Re: [dev] How about sta.li ?

2010-08-01 Thread Anselm R Garbe
On 1 August 2010 08:30, pancake wrote: > Cant this be done with a wraper shellscript ? Messing with gnu ld is like a > near death experience. Indeed, it can be done using some shell scripts but it'll be quite slow. My initial efforts were gold related, though that's written in C++ which is a bit

Re: [dev] How about sta.li ?

2010-08-01 Thread Anselm R Garbe
On 1 August 2010 08:43, pancake wrote: > I want to say that in latest glibc (see archlinux) many 9base programs cant > be executed because of being static. > > Compiling bionic would be great but I was unAble to workaround their > makefiles to do it without the android sdk. > > Glibc must be avoid

Re: [dev] How about sta.li ?

2010-08-01 Thread Anselm R Garbe
On 1 August 2010 11:38, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote: > On 1 Aug 2010, at 8:43, pancake wrote: > >> I want to say that in latest glibc (see archlinux) many 9base programs >> cant be executed because of being static. >> >> Compiling bionic would be great but I was unAble to workaround their >> makefil

Re: [dev] How about sta.li ?

2010-08-01 Thread Robert Ransom
On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 11:38:14 +0100 Ethan Grammatikidis wrote: > On 1 Aug 2010, at 8:43, pancake wrote: > > I wrote slpm which can be used as template for binary and src > > packages and it supports static compilation. A repo of bins for it > > can be good. Packages aré pretty similar to slack

Re: [dev] How about sta.li ?

2010-08-01 Thread Robert Ransom
On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 19:39:45 +0100 Anselm R Garbe wrote: > As said earlier, I don't think any kind of package management/system > is needed apart from hg or rsync. Why not rip portsnap or freebsd-update out of FreeBSD 8.x? Those can do incremental updates from a static-content-only HTTP server,

Re: [dev] How about sta.li ? - libc tangent

2010-08-01 Thread Robert Ransom
On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 12:35:56 +0100 Ethan Grammatikidis wrote: > I figure it could go one of two ways. One way some functionality would > be disabled, giving a very p9p-like result. I called this 9libc. The > other way, a 9p multiplexer server could be made. Along with support > servers this

[dev] [surf] Scrolling with direction keys

2010-08-01 Thread Nick
I just updated webkit-gtk from 1.18 to 1.20, and now the direction up / down keys select the next / previous link, rather than scrolling up and down. I see now that surf advertises only Ctrl-K & Ctrl-J scrolling, but I find the direction keys more comfortable. Attached is a little patch restori

[dev] Re: [surf] Scrolling with direction keys

2010-08-01 Thread Nick
Quoth Nick: > I just updated webkit-gtk from 1.18 to 1.20, and now the direction Sorry, I meant 1.1.15.4 to 1.2.3. pgp7dY1ORdv27.pgp Description: PGP signature

[dev] Assembly interpreter/vm

2010-08-01 Thread Paolo
Once I saw a project for a suckless Assembly interpreter / vm, I can't remember - but I'm sure I've seen it on a personal website of someone here. I've spent half an hour searching but I'm probably doing it wrong. Any hints? --- Wyrmskull

Re: [dev] Assembly interpreter/vm

2010-08-01 Thread Jacob Todd
On Sun, Aug 01, 2010 at 01:07:06PM -0700, Paolo wrote: > Once I saw a project for a suckless Assembly interpreter / vm, > I can't remember - but I'm sure I've seen it on a personal > website of someone here. I've spent half an hour searching > but I'm probably doing it wrong. Any hints? radare? htt

Re: [dev] How about sta.li ? - libc tangent

2010-08-01 Thread yy
2010/8/1 Ethan Grammatikidis : > > Along with support servers this could > ultimately give a very complete Plan 9 experience without any of the > performance issues of virtualisation or the other issues of 9vx. Do you know what would give a more complete Plan 9 experience? Plan 9. I can see the b

Re: [dev] Assembly interpreter/vm

2010-08-01 Thread Paolo
Huh, could be, but... The assembly interpreter I saw some years ago just had some code piped in, and the demos/examples were written in a single html page. Has that tiny bit grown into such a project? I'll have a look, thanks Jacob (and pancake of course). Jacob Todd wrote: > On Sun, Aug 01, 2010

Re: [dev] [surf] Scrolling with direction keys

2010-08-01 Thread Matthew Bauer
I have the same thing in my surf config. One problem I have noticed however is that if you use an application like Google Spreadsheets, you will not be able to navigate between rows with the up and down keys like you would in a normal browser. On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Nick wrote: > I just

Re: [dev] [wmii] Between tiling and floating

2010-08-01 Thread LuX
Hello! > Message de Kris Maglione: lun. 26/07/10, 19:46:43 -0400 > Event AreaFocus if wi_seltag | grep $master_tags >/dev/null; then > export area=$1 > width=$(wmiir read /tag/sel/index | awk '$2 == ENVIRON["area"] > { print $4; exit }') > delta=$((

Re: [dev] [surf] Scrolling with direction keys

2010-08-01 Thread 1
On Sun, Aug 01, 2010 at 09:07:40PM +0100, Nick wrote: > I just updated webkit-gtk from 1.18 to 1.20, and now the direction > up / down keys select the next / previous link, rather than > scrolling up and down. I see now that surf advertises only Ctrl-K & > Ctrl-J scrolling, but I find the direct