Re: [dev] [st] 0.1 Feedback - Was: A few small patches

2011-04-11 Thread Bryan Bennett
I've had a pop at tidying it up a bit, I'm not getting as many silly characters filtered through, would you mind giving it a try with what you were doing and seeing if it's any better? Your new version of the patch seems to work *MUCH* better. In the couple tests I've run, the random line noise I

Re: [dev] [surf] [PATCHES] (1) GConf URL schema handlers (2) delete _SURF_GO xprop (3) close stdout sending XID

2011-04-11 Thread Adam Strzelecki
Security isn't kept. This seems like more of a prevention of accidental disclosure than real security. (And therefore pointless...?) As an example, with this patch applied, run the following: The output in the spy terminal is: _SURF_GO: not found _SURF_GO(UTF8_STRING) = 0x61, 0x73, 0x64,

Re: [dev] [ANN] sabotage 2011-04-09, a musl+busybox based distribution

2011-04-11 Thread pancake
Yo On 10/04/2011, at 15:53, Christian Neukirchen chneukirc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, this is the first public release of sabotage, a distribution based on musl and busybox. Provided software is: 9base-6 binutils-2.21 busybox-1.18.4 curl-7.21.4 e2fsprogs-1.41.14 gawk-3.1.8 git-1.7.4

Re: [dev] @bleidl, 26/03/11 19:41

2011-04-11 Thread pancake
You can use twitter from api. Bitlbee have a irc gateway for twitter too. And there's ttytter. Which is a cmdline client. Web sucks, and its not the only way to access it. It offers several stuff the irc doesnt like indexing contents, clear timelines (not noisy irc channels) and bulk dumps. So

Re: [dev] [ANN] sabotage 2011-04-09, a musl+busybox based distribution

2011-04-11 Thread Jacob Todd
Is there a reason to not use dropbear in place of openssh?

Re: [dev] [ANN] sabotage 2011-04-09, a musl+busybox based distribution

2011-04-11 Thread Kurt H Maier
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 2:53 PM, pancake panc...@youterm.com wrote: About graphical support.. Im expecting to see the first release of wayland that should be public during this year. I think is the best alternative to x11 atm. It relies on modern hw. But its codebase is about 5000LOC. Not

Re: [musl] Re: [dev] [ANN] sabotage 2011-04-09, a musl+busybox based distribution

2011-04-11 Thread Christian Neukirchen
pancake panc...@youterm.com writes: 9base-6 binutils-2.21 busybox-1.18.4 curl-7.21.4 e2fsprogs-1.41.14 gawk-3.1.8 git-1.7.4 gmp-5.0.1 linux-2.6.38.2 m4-1.4.16 make-3.82 mpc-0.9 mpfr-3.0.1 musl-2011-04-09 openssh-5.8p1 openssl-1.0.0d perl-5.12.3 pkg-config-0.25 sed-4.2.1 syslinux-4.03

[dev] Re: [ANN] sabotage 2011-04-09, a musl+busybox based distribution

2011-04-11 Thread Christian Neukirchen
Jacob Todd jaketodd...@gmail.com writes: Is there a reason to not use dropbear in place of openssh? Personal preference. Dropbear has been built with musl as well. -- Christian Neukirchen chneukirc...@gmail.com http://chneukirchen.org

Re: [musl] Re: [dev] [ANN] sabotage 2011-04-09, a musl+busybox based distribution

2011-04-11 Thread pancake
Slpm is probably much simpler than any ports system out there. It still needs some love..But it works for my use cases. I recommend you to take a look on it. :) I already packaged musl, tcc and other stuff in slpm Gnite. Tomorrow ill give a try to the hacks you talk about. Having x11 and gtk3