Errata: I meant logind. It's really difficult to remember anything but
the d in the end, as the distribution now uses everythingd...
On 11/19/2012 03:53 AM, 7...@mail.com wrote:
I do *TOTALLY* agree. (one could cote netcfg in addition to systemd
and profiled and...)
If you want the complete l
I do *TOTALLY* agree. (one could cote netcfg in addition to systemd and
profiled and...)
If you want the complete list, go to http://archlinux.org/news it's faster.
7heo.
On 11/18/2012 09:56 AM, clamiax wrote:
I do not want to get involved in one of the usual useless discussions about
how muc
* Woldemar ShiPa [2012-11-18 20:29:14 +0400]:
> Hello. I've got a st bug trying to execute st -e mc command. Sometimes it
> works
> as expected and mc runs fullscreen, sometimes used only a half of st window.
does it get solved after you resize st?
i observed similar behaviour and i think that'
söndagen den 18 november 2012 14.04.27 skrev Christian Neukirchen:
> There are probably more sabotage forks than users by now. :) I don't
> know which ones does the symlink-stuff, but I can also tell you about my
> ideas then.
The rofl0r one is the one I consider "upstream" and he releases disk
söndagen den 18 november 2012 07.42.52 skrev Strake:
> One may use stacking bind mounts rather than symlinks. I know no
> decent such fs in Linux kernel space, as aufsn and unionfs seem
> cumbersome, but it ought to not be too difficult in user space, as 9p
> server.
This is indeed a really cool
I rewrote stow in guile about 10 years ago when I did my gnu/hurd distro it was
much more maintainable and short.. Not because of perl, but gnu. But well.. I
dont think this is going to give anything good to the discussion.
I use arch nowadays but im sure it will not be my next prefered distro w
On 2012-11-18 at 11:04:31
Kurt H Maier wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 07:00:23AM +0100, Jens Staal wrote:
> > For me, this is a nicer solution than for example pacman to keep
> > track on which files that belong to which package (no fragile
> > databases needed). I am also happy to report that
Dnia 18 listopada 2012 17:04 Kurt H Maier napisał(a):
> When I discovered wayland required mesa, I cited it as the biggest
> problem wayland had. Now it has other problems, but mesa still really
> sucks. Not only does it depend on libudev, it has a build-time dep on
> libxml2 (unsure if that is
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 07:00:23AM +0100, Jens Staal wrote:
> For me, this is a nicer solution than for example pacman to keep track on
> which files that belong to which package (no fragile databases needed). I am
> also happy to report that dmenu/dwm works nicely on Sabotage (however, it
> see
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 2:32 PM, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> tinycore also links all files of mounted squashfs mounts into the
> /usr/local. That kind of hack is more simple than stuff like unionfs.
>
With replacements being written into /usr? I prefer the indirection
being behind a standard a
Strake writes:
> On 18/11/2012, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote:
>> GNU Stow also.
>
> Oh, yeah, that's what we need: more perl.
I remember relink.sf.net which is written in Perl too, but the code
looks really simple and it probably can be written in pure shell as
well.
--
Christian Neukirchenht
tinycore also links all files of mounted squashfs mounts into the
/usr/local. That kind of hack is more simple than stuff like unionfs.
@Anselm I think all those changes will come with the official 6.1 release?
Good work though.
Take care.
Anselm R Garbe writes:
> On 18 November 2012 07:00, Jens Staal wrote:
>> lördagen den 17 november 2012 14.50.23 skrev Kurt H Maier:
>>> On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 06:20:03PM +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>>> > sta.li
>>> > --
>>> > To me archlinux was a good distro until a couple of years ago.
On 18/11/2012, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote:
> GNU Stow also.
Oh, yeah, that's what we need: more perl.
Jens Staal wrote:
> I agree with this. As an example distribution, Sabotage does things pretty
> well. One detail that I like a lot (but it sort of depends on your stance on
> symlinks) is the way applications usually are placed in it:
> Each application gets its own directory under /opt and then
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Felix Janda wrote:
> On 11/18/12 at 07:00am, Jens Staal wrote:
>> Each application gets its own directory under /opt and then installed files
>> get symlinks in / (the file system hierarchy is stali-inspired with
>> everything
>> in root and usr just pointing bac
On 11/18/12 at 07:00am, Jens Staal wrote:
> I agree with this. As an example distribution, Sabotage does things pretty
> well. One detail that I like a lot (but it sort of depends on your stance on
> symlinks) is the way applications usually are placed in it:
>
> Each application gets its own di
On 18 November 2012 07:00, Jens Staal wrote:
> lördagen den 17 november 2012 14.50.23 skrev Kurt H Maier:
>> On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 06:20:03PM +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>> > sta.li
>> > --
>> > To me archlinux was a good distro until a couple of years ago.
>> > Nowadays it seems to be ver
I do not want to get involved in one of the usual useless discussions about
how much something sucks. As for me, I have never been able to install
Archlinux without having to use a custom kernel, which is unacceptable for
a serious linux distro. The system is often unstable, the community is
rather
20 matches
Mail list logo
