Hello,
2013/11/23 :
> For my personal use of dwm I have written a small
> patch to support Xft---it actually decreases the
> line count of dwm. I thought it would be useful
> to share it with you.
>
> You will also notice that the patch changes the
> window creation semantics. This is because I
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 05:28:20PM -0500, Carlos Torres wrote:
> Here is a simpler patch that adds _NET_WM_NAME Atom to st.
>
Ok, if it is ok for everyone I will apply this patch instead
of the previous.
Regards,
--
Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
Hello.
On Sat, 23 Nov 2013 10:58:04 +0100 "Roberto E. Vargas Caballero"
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 05:28:20PM -0500, Carlos Torres wrote:
> > Here is a simpler patch that adds _NET_WM_NAME Atom to st.
> >
>
> Ok, if it is ok for everyone I will apply this patch instead
> of the previous.
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 07:49:25PM +0100, Markus Teich wrote:
> Andrew Gwozdziewycz wrote:
> > My guess is the biggest objection (certainly mine) is that everything
> > happens
> > in `main` instead of breaking the work down into smaller functions that do
> > one
> > thing.
>
> Actually I starte
> Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 00:32:39 +0100
> From: q...@c9x.me
> To: dev@suckless.org
> Subject: [dev] [dwm] Xft patch
>
> For my personal use of dwm I have written a small
> patch to support Xft---it actually decreases the
> line count of dwm. I thought it wou
Hi,
since I intend to use dmenu as a simple file-browser, it would be nice
if the C-w shortcut also deleted one slash to the left (but not more),
i.e., /home/user/_ [C-w] should become /home/_.
Thanks,
Jan-Christian
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 07:47:18PM +0100, Jente Hidskes wrote:
>
> I'm curious, why didn't you opt for the already available XFT patch?
>
Because it cannot be applied to the current version
of dwm, despite his promising name.
-- Quentin
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 12:22:08PM +0300, Alexander S. wrote:
> Please try to break patches down to atomic changes relevant to each other.
Hello,
It was easier for me to provide one patch.
Would you do something with it if I splitted the
previous patch in two parts? My modification to
the windo
Hello,
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 11:51 PM, wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 07:47:18PM +0100, Jente Hidskes wrote:
>>
>> I'm curious, why didn't you opt for the already available XFT patch?
>>
>
> Because it cannot be applied to the current version
> of dwm,
The 6.0 patch can be applied to the 6.1
Hello,
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 11:51 PM, wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 07:47:18PM +0100, Jente Hidskes wrote:
>>
>> I'm curious, why didn't you opt for the already available XFT patch?
>>
>
> Because it cannot be applied to the current version
> of dwm,
The 6.0 patch can be applied to the 6.1
10 matches
Mail list logo
