You forgot to shit about vulkan in your rampage. (/s)
Maybe you could be helpful and provide an idea for the problem Kamil is asking,
instead of ranting about not using C.
I still remember the words of arg, FRIGN & co after slcon4 stating that they'll
start moderating the community. All I've se
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 02:25:54PM +0200, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 06:00:51 +
> sylvain.bertr...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Hey Sylvain,
>
> > go is not suckless.
> >
> > Should have written your PoC using simple C.
>
> what are you talking about? Go is an adequate language for
On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 23:15:35 +0200
Kamil Cholewiński wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Sep 2017, Antenore Gatta wrote:
> > Well, I hope it's what you are looking for.
>
> It's totally not, but I see where you're coming from :)
>
> You may want to look at Ansible Tower, Rundeck, or similar stuff.
> They al
On Fri, 22 Sep 2017, Antenore Gatta wrote:
> Well, I hope it's what you are looking for.
It's totally not, but I see where you're coming from :)
You may want to look at Ansible Tower, Rundeck, or similar stuff.
They all suck, but they do solve this kind of problem in a much more
manageable manne
Back to real life with a real keyboard and a real system!!!
I keep the previous answer to have a context.
On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 16:21:08 +
Antenore wrote:
> >Now back to PrivEsc, I actually found Antenore's suggestion
> >inspiring. It would work if we could force only part of the command
> >to
>Now back to PrivEsc, I actually found Antenore's suggestion inspiring.
>It would work if we could force only part of the command to remain
>constant, and use the constant part to perform non-interactive
>authentication (e.g. by verifying a provided secret). Essentially
>delegate authentication to
I love how every discussin here eventually derails into "XYZ sucks".
Yes, XYZ sucks. But FGH sucks more. I want to do what FGH does, because
while FGH sucks, it solves a real-world problem.
Now back to PrivEsc, I actually found Antenore's suggestion inspiring.
It would work if we could force only
On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 06:00:51 +
sylvain.bertr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey Sylvain,
> go is not suckless.
>
> Should have written your PoC using simple C.
what are you talking about? Go is an adequate language for certain
higher-level-applications.
The only beef I have about it is the large binar
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 10:35:26AM +0200, Kamil Cholewiński wrote:
> > go is not suckless.
> >
> > Should have written your PoC using simple C.
>
> Does C magically solve my design problem?
> At PoC stage, implementation language absolutely does not matter.
> I'd write it in PL/SQL if that solved
> go is not suckless.
>
> Should have written your PoC using simple C.
Does C magically solve my design problem?
At PoC stage, implementation language absolutely does not matter.
I'd write it in PL/SQL if that solved the problem at hand.
<3,K.
10 matches
Mail list logo
