Re: [dev] [dwm] Bluetooth XF86 keys not working

2023-01-16 Thread Storkman
On January 17, 2023 3:03:52 AM UTC, Anskrevy wrote: >I've got XF86XK_AudioPlay bound in my config.h with the necessary >include file, and this hotkey works when I use my keyboard. However, >when sent from a pair of bluetooth headphones the hotkey isn't >triggered. I've got the following xev

[dev] [dwm] Bluetooth XF86 keys not working

2023-01-16 Thread Anskrevy
I've got XF86XK_AudioPlay bound in my config.h with the necessary include file, and this hotkey works when I use my keyboard. However, when sent from a pair of bluetooth headphones the hotkey isn't triggered. I've got the following xev output which shows the two keys are slightly different

Re: [SPAM Warning!][dev] [dwm] view() and toggleview() functions

2023-01-16 Thread Storkman
On January 16, 2023 11:21:57 AM UTC, A Farzat wrote: >Btw, on the email subject it says [SPAM Warning!]. Is it anything I need >to be concerned with? Spam filters hate the .xyz TLD because it's supposedly "frequently used by spammers". I don't know why single out that one in particular, but

Re: [dev] st: no need for scrollback patch or program by using -o option

2023-01-16 Thread Страхиња Радић
On 23/01/16 12:33, Страхиња Радић wrote: > Most of what's to be said in "defense" of st and other suckless software is > already out there on suckless.org, including the sorry state of XTerm being > the > driving idea behind writing st, which the OP turned upside-down, so that's > one > more

Re: [dev] st: no need for scrollback patch or program by using -o option

2023-01-16 Thread Страхиња Радић
On 23/01/14 09:25, Markus Wichmann wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 07:53:41PM -0600, Dave Blanchard wrote: > > I experimented with st for a week or so, before finally realizing that > > it's poorly-written trash. It has no advantages over XTerm at all. > > > > So where's the patch? > > Given

Re: [dev] [dwm] view() and toggleview() functions

2023-01-16 Thread NRK
On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 08:21:57PM +0900, A Farzat wrote: > Btw, on the email subject it says [SPAM Warning!]. Is it anything I need > to be concerned with? No, you're good. It was just a false positive on my end and I forgot to remove that before replying. - NRK

Re: [SPAM Warning!][dev] [dwm] view() and toggleview() functions

2023-01-16 Thread A Farzat
On 23/01/16 12:10pm, NRK wrote: > On Sun, Jan 15, 2023 at 06:28:55PM +0900, A Farzat wrote: > > 2- In the view() function, there is this line: > > ```c > > selmon->seltags ^= 1; /* toggle sel tagset */ > > ``` > > What is the purpose of this line? In fact, what is the purpose of having > > two