Re: [dev] [st] windows port?

2013-04-12 Thread Max DeLiso
What I can take away from the collective thoughts above is this: effort spent trying to make windows better is generally wasted, and contributes to the problem of the proliferation of shitty software. I agree with this. > As for "normal users" they need a good kick in a nuts to wake up and learn t

Re: [dev] [st] windows port?

2013-04-11 Thread Max DeLiso
On Apr 11, 2013 5:04 PM, "Strake" wrote: > > On 11/04/2013, Max DeLiso wrote: > > I completely agree that Windows is a legacy OS, but plenty of people are > > still forced to use it for many legitimate reasons. > > Forced? How? At knifepoint? Lock-in.

Re: [dev] [st] windows port?

2013-04-11 Thread Max DeLiso
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Joseph Xu wrote: > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Max DeLiso wrote: >> A) That's stupid >> B) Therefore OP must be stupid. > > I don't think you're stupid, because the few times I've had to use > cmd.exe, I've

Re: [dev] [st] windows port?

2013-04-11 Thread Max DeLiso
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Nick wrote: > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:45:48PM -0400, Jacob Todd wrote: >> Kill yourself. > > Please can we try not to be needlessly dramatic and unpleasant here? > seconding this! It's juvenile and counterproductive.

Re: [dev] [st] windows port?

2013-04-11 Thread Max DeLiso
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:46 PM, wrote: >> The web is the future of computing, that much is evident. > > The web is not even the present of computing. Most humans > access the Internet using custom clients ("apps") on mobile > devices. Really depends how you define web doesn't it? If by web you

Re: [dev] [st] windows port?

2013-04-11 Thread Max DeLiso
On Apr 11, 2013 11:54 AM, "Christoph Lohmann" <2...@r-36.net> wrote: > > Greetings. > > On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 17:48:11 +0200 Max DeLiso wrote: > > I know what you're probably thinking. > > > > A) That's stupid > > Windows is the reaso

Re: [dev] [st] windows port?

2013-04-11 Thread Max DeLiso
On Apr 11, 2013 11:23 AM, "Martti Kühne" wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Max DeLiso wrote: > > > > Well it does add an extra layer of abstraction which could be a source of > > bugs. Also that would make contributing significantly more di

Re: [dev] [st] windows port?

2013-04-11 Thread Max DeLiso
On Apr 11, 2013 11:05 AM, "Martti Kühne" wrote: > > What are you writing C++ code if you could use Xming or even cygwin to > just compile the actual st on windows? Well it does add an extra layer of abstraction which could be a source of bugs. Also that would make contributing significantly more

[dev] [st] windows port?

2013-04-11 Thread Max DeLiso
I know what you're probably thinking. A) That's stupid B) Therefore OP must be stupid. But wait for just one second! The state of the command prompt on windows is a mess. There are several massive, tangled, bug-ridden, and crufty subsystems which must interact in multiple ways in order to make i