Jens Staal dixit:
> By the way: what is the status of MirOS on top of Linux? A dead project?
It was never really worked on but apparently got hyped in
“the media” (especially Wikipedia, which is known to get
its facts wrong but disallow corrections). It was basically
a “we could…” idea but not im
On 2013-06-18 22:04, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Jens Staal dixit:
I am looking at Alpine at the moment... uclibc/busybox based
That is precisely the thing I was *not* addressing by stating
“company-use” ☺
Don’t get me wrong, I’ve started toying with something musl too,
but for “at work” you don’
> > Did nobody fork Arch from before it became poettering’d and UsrMove’d
> > yet? May call it Hintern Linux ;-)
>
> I can understand why this crowd is afraid of systemd, but being afraid
> of the /usr move stuff just baffles me.
There's worse.
http://jasonwryan.com/blog/2013/06/15/askin
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 07:38:45PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Jens Staal dixit:
>
> >> How does someone use that package on a working Linux distribution?
>
> > That depends on how you define "working".
>
> Did nobody fork Arch from before it became poettering’d and UsrMove’d
> yet? May call
Jens Staal dixit:
> I am looking at Alpine at the moment... uclibc/busybox based
That is precisely the thing I was *not* addressing by stating
“company-use” ☺
Don’t get me wrong, I’ve started toying with something musl too,
but for “at work” you don’t want that, or can’t justify it, or
whatever.
> Jens Staal dixit:
> > That depends on how you define "working".
>
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 07:38:45PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Did nobody fork Arch from before it became poettering’d and UsrMove’d
> yet? May call it Hintern Linux ;-)
Last I spoke to strake, starch wasn't really ready yet.
On tis 18 jun 2013 21:38:45, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Jens Staal dixit:
How does someone use that package on a working Linux distribution?
That depends on how you define "working".
Did nobody fork Arch from before it became poettering’d and UsrMove’d
yet? May call it Hintern Linux ;-)
Indee
Jens Staal dixit:
>> How does someone use that package on a working Linux distribution?
> That depends on how you define "working".
Did nobody fork Arch from before it became poettering’d and UsrMove’d
yet? May call it Hintern Linux ;-)
Indeed, I see a serious problem should Debian also fall, b
On 2013-06-18 16:58, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
Greetings.
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:58:58 +0200 Jens Staal wrote:
I have no idea if anyone is interested, but a large part of sbase built
with the open watcom compiler using its included (rather limited)
c-library... mostly for fun.
https://aur.arc
Greetings.
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:58:58 +0200 Jens Staal wrote:
> I have no idea if anyone is interested, but a large part of sbase built
> with the open watcom compiler using its included (rather limited)
> c-library... mostly for fun.
>
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sbase-ow-git/
I have no idea if anyone is interested, but a large part of sbase built
with the open watcom compiler using its included (rather limited)
c-library... mostly for fun.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sbase-ow-git/
11 matches
Mail list logo
