Hi Kamil,
On 4 July 2017 at 14:32, Kamil Cholewiński wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Jul 2017, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>> I've used my own for almost a decade: http://monitor.garbe.us/
>> It checkes the services every 20 minutes and sends me a mail if some
>> service goes offline.
>
> Care to share the code?
without machine learning and genetic algorithms i fear i might get
woken up in the middle of the night.
On Tue, 04 Jul 2017, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> I've used my own for almost a decade: http://monitor.garbe.us/
> It checkes the services every 20 minutes and sends me a mail if some
> service goes offline.
Care to share the code?
Hi,
On 4 July 2017 at 11:31, Kamil Cholewiński wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Jul 2017, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>> On 4 July 2017 at 00:36, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>>> On 4 July 2017 at 00:06, Michael Forney wrote:
I noticed that git.suckless.org is no longer accepting connections
with the git prot
On Tue, 4 Jul 2017 11:23:58 +0200
"Ivan J." wrote:
Hey Ivan,
> How would anonymous pushing to the sites repository keep working?
you can push over git:// when push access is enabled. No need for a
ssh-login.
With best regards
Laslo Hunhold
--
Laslo Hunhold
On Tue, 04 Jul 2017, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> On 4 July 2017 at 00:36, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>> On 4 July 2017 at 00:06, Michael Forney wrote:
>>> I noticed that git.suckless.org is no longer accepting connections
>>> with the git protocol. HTTP still works though.
>>>
>>> Just pointing that out
On Tue, 04 Jul 2017, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Jul 2017 10:12:45 +0200
> Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
>
> Hey Hiltjo,
>
> > Maybe we should only allow SSH for private repos and git:// for the
> > public ones (sites). This is also more efficient.
> >
> > What do you think?
>
> I assume you me
On Tue, 4 Jul 2017 10:12:45 +0200
Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
Hey Hiltjo,
> Maybe we should only allow SSH for private repos and git:// for the
> public ones (sites). This is also more efficient.
>
> What do you think?
I assume you mean that we only allow git:// for read-only cloning of
the repos a
On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 12:46:58AM +0200, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> On 4 July 2017 at 00:36, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> > On 4 July 2017 at 00:06, Michael Forney wrote:
> >> I noticed that git.suckless.org is no longer accepting connections
> >> with the git protocol. HTTP still works though.
> >>
> >
On 4 July 2017 at 00:36, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> On 4 July 2017 at 00:06, Michael Forney wrote:
>> I noticed that git.suckless.org is no longer accepting connections
>> with the git protocol. HTTP still works though.
>>
>> Just pointing that out in case it wasn't a deliberate change.
>
> Nice spo
Hi Michael,
On 4 July 2017 at 00:06, Michael Forney wrote:
> I noticed that git.suckless.org is no longer accepting connections
> with the git protocol. HTTP still works though.
>
> Just pointing that out in case it wasn't a deliberate change.
Nice spot, wasn't deliberate and is caused by the se
Hi,
I noticed that git.suckless.org is no longer accepting connections
with the git protocol. HTTP still works though.
Just pointing that out in case it wasn't a deliberate change.
-Michael
12 matches
Mail list logo
