Although taking a different approach (conf file parsed at start-up,
additional features), the sxhkd/shkd might be of interest.
The former is for X and the latter for the console. The two have
compatible configuration files formats.
https://github.com/baskerville/sxhkd
I added hotkey config file support. It is so ugly, and requires much
more code. I am ashamed of it to be honest, but it works.
except when it segfaults if your config isn't written pefectly. i'm
working on that.
On 11 February 2014 06:07, Kurt Van Dijck
dev.k...@vandijck-laurijssen.be wrote:
Thank you for this little gem!
A humble feature request: add the ability to have modal keybindings /
modes as in vim(1), etc…
Maybe someone with more experience could combine the superb keymodes
patch with this?
After hacking the code myself a little I am struck at implementing it
myself, as
I'm not sure what you mean by modal bindings. Do you mean like
executing a hotkey like Ctrl+: to jump the hotkey program, then
pressing another key to execute a command? Sorry I'm not sure what you
are saying.
Calvin
On 10 February 2014 17:02, Michael Hauser awarewa...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank
Calvin Morrison writes:
I'm not sure what you mean by modal bindings. Do you mean like
executing a hotkey like Ctrl+: to jump the hotkey program, then
pressing another key to execute a command? Sorry I'm not sure what you
are saying.
Calvin
Exactly!
Use case: one hotkey (in my case: the
make a hidden window, and set the window focus to it? that'd be my
guess. I don't think you can grab two non modifier keys though, and
for example probably wouldn't work with the way I am grabbing it.
I'd love too see some code.
A visual hint could be nice. I definitely see the advantage of a
On 10 February 2014 18:31, Calvin Morrison mutanttur...@gmail.com wrote:
make a hidden window, and set the window focus to it? that'd be my
guess. I don't think you can grab two non modifier keys though, and
for example probably wouldn't work with the way I am grabbing it.
I'd love too see
Calvin Morrison writes:
make a hidden window, and set the window focus to it? that'd be my
guess. I don't think you can grab two non modifier keys though, and
for example probably wouldn't work with the way I am grabbing it.
I'd love too see some code.
Yes, I tried to load/unload the grabs
Calvin Morrison writes:
8--8--
and here it is:
$ cat modal.sh
list=firefox
chromium
xterm
xterm -e mocp
v=0
`for i in $list; do echo $v $i; v=$(($v+1)); done | dmenu -l 5 |
sed 's/^[0-9] //g'`
now it has some kinks, the whole for i in whatever in
On 2014-02-09 01:43:55 -0500, Calvin Morrison wrote:
Surely the user knows what shell they are using? Sure it's a valid
point, but almost irrelevant at the same time. Who cares about their
shell behavior? If they think it's an issue, then they need not run
any commands. I assume people are
Calvin Morrison:
On 9 February 2014 01:07, Chris Down ch...@chrisdown.name wrote:
- You are using system(), which is highly unportable and extremely
fragile;
I'm not so sure. What's a better solution?
http://lubutu.com/code/spawning-in-unix
Although taking a different approach (conf file parsed at start-up,
additional features), the sxhkd/shkd might be of interest.
The former is for X and the latter for the console. The two have
compatible configuration files formats.
https://github.com/baskerville/sxhkd
On 09/02/14, Chris Down wrote:
On 2014-02-09 01:43:55 -0500, Calvin Morrison wrote:
Surely the user knows what shell they are using? Sure it's a valid
point, but almost irrelevant at the same time. Who cares about their
shell behavior? If they think it's an issue, then they need not run
any
On Sunday 09 February 2014 01:22:00 Calvin Morrison wrote:
I h8 licensing schemes which make me read the text... somebody call
their lawyer and sue, looks like mit is not 4 me.
have a look at the poetic license
http://www.genaud.net/2005/10/poetic-license/
... its cute while still saying
On 2014-02-09 14:18:01 +0100, Jens Staal wrote:
have a look at the poetic license
http://www.genaud.net/2005/10/poetic-license/
... its cute while still saying everything that is needed.
...and almost certainly not legally tested.
pgpb36Q16Si39.pgp
Description: PGP signature
This is great! I was just having a discussion about someone for a
non-x11 keyboard binding system!
Thanks for the link
Calvin Morrison
On 9 February 2014 05:32, Raphaël Proust raphla...@gmail.com wrote:
Although taking a different approach (conf file parsed at start-up,
additional features),
Comrades -
I have had a love affair with dwm's config.h. Unfortunately I also
love i3, and also deal with a plethora of other desktops on my day to
day work. so I created hotkey (1).
Why wasn't there a simple way to have hotkeys, dealt with properly, in
a suckless manner? I don't want inane
On 2014-02-08 18:37:19 -0500, Calvin Morrison wrote:
I have had a love affair with dwm's config.h. Unfortunately I also
love i3, and also deal with a plethora of other desktops on my day to
day work. so I created hotkey (1).
Why wasn't there a simple way to have hotkeys, dealt with properly,
On 9 February 2014 01:07, Chris Down ch...@chrisdown.name wrote:
On 2014-02-08 18:37:19 -0500, Calvin Morrison wrote:
I have had a love affair with dwm's config.h. Unfortunately I also
love i3, and also deal with a plethora of other desktops on my day to
day work. so I created hotkey (1).
On 2014-02-09 01:22:00 -0500, Calvin Morrison wrote:
- You are using system(), which is highly unportable and extremely
fragile;
I'm not so sure. What's a better solution? system() seems like a very
standard function. Portability is also not a real concern for me. mos
everybody uses
On 9 February 2014 01:36, Chris Down ch...@chrisdown.name wrote:
On 2014-02-09 01:22:00 -0500, Calvin Morrison wrote:
- You are using system(), which is highly unportable and extremely
fragile;
I'm not so sure. What's a better solution? system() seems like a very
standard function.
21 matches
Mail list logo
