Hi suckless users,
I was wondering what tool or method you would use to purpose simple file
upload on your server (via an html form as example)? CGI? PHP? Other?
Regards,
--
,--.
: /` ) Xavier Cartron
| `-'
\_
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 13 May 2013 17:17, Thuban wrote:
> I was wondering what tool or method you would use to purpose simple file
> upload on your server (via an html form as example)? CGI? PHP? Other?
PHP is the simplest way I've found https://github.com/kaihendry/FTP2.0
Greetings.
On Mon, 13 May 2013 18:21:40 +0200 Thuban wrote:
> Hi suckless users,
> I was wondering what tool or method you would use to purpose simple file
> upload on your server (via an html form as example)? CGI? PHP? Other?
Don’t support the web, use FTP/SFTP.
Sincerely,
Christoph Lohmann
Ftp sucks
On May 13, 2013 12:25 PM, "Christoph Lohmann" <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> On Mon, 13 May 2013 18:21:40 +0200 Thuban wrote:
> > Hi suckless users,
> > I was wondering what tool or method you would use to purpose simple file
> > upload on your server (via an html form as examp
2013/5/13 Calvin Morrison
> Ftp sucks
>
Could you explain me why FTP sucks?
Regards
--
H.Mo.
Hugues Moretto-Viry dixit:
>Could you explain me why FTP sucks?
http://mywiki.wooledge.org/FtpMustDie
bye,
//mirabilos
--
13:37⎜«Natureshadow» Deep inside, I hate mirabilos. I mean, he's a good
guy. But he's always right! In every fsckin' situation, he's right. Even
with his deeply perverted ta
I currently use sftp for this.
But it's not easy to use for browser-addicted-humans...
It's difficult to find something simple and "userfriendly".
Thanks for your first answers.
Regards,
--
,--.
: /` ) Xavier Cartron
| `-'
\_
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 10:38:32PM +0200, Thuban wrote:
> But it's not easy to use for browser-addicted-humans...
These people are the reason we /are/ in this mess called "web".
If they can't use proper protocols for different tasks
but just their crappy bloated browser.. Fine by me!
Disregarded u
how can you chadbands use a file transfer protocol without XML?!
HTTP PUT is a reasonable way to do it, but browsers don't support it well.
Meanwhile, HTTP POST multipart/form-data with CGI is least worst.
I don't like PHP, it is fully insane and has a long history of poor security.
HTTP PUT with ranges would be useful, could mount filesystems over HTTP.
Sam
On Mon, May 13, 2013, at 23:20, Sam Watkins wrote:
> HTTP PUT with ranges would be useful, could mount filesystems over HTTP.
There's no standard HTTP directory listing.
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 2:44 PM, wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2013, at 23:20, Sam Watkins wrote:
>> HTTP PUT with ranges would be useful, could mount filesystems over HTTP.
>
> There's no standard HTTP directory listing.
>
How is lack of a standard a problem in that concern? The topic was
about upl
Greetings.
On Tue, 14 May 2013 17:12:18 +0200 Martti Kühne wrote:
> How is lack of a standard a problem in that concern? The topic was
> about uploads, and even my cfw cgi server [0] supports uploads and you
> could just go and implement a sufficiently featured directory listing
> that fits your
On 14 May 2013 17:12, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 14 May 2013 17:12:18 +0200 Martti Kühne wrote:
>> How is lack of a standard a problem in that concern? The topic was
>> about uploads, and even my cfw cgi server [0] supports uploads and you
>> could just go and implement a s
On 13 May 2013 23:11, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> how can you chadbands use a file transfer protocol without XML?!
XML is for the file listing. :-) https://s3-ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com/krkl
Greetings.
On Tue, 14 May 2013 17:31:26 +0200 Kai Hendry wrote:
> On 13 May 2013 23:11, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > how can you chadbands use a file transfer protocol without XML?!
>
> XML is for the file listing. :-) https://s3-ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com/krkl
That link is a crime
His highness, preach us about the goodness and wisdom of FTP instead,
the protocol where the server waits for the client to open a reverse
session...
Usually, free time doesn't permit a self-coded solution, here I sit
using ssh and sshfs for virtually everything.
cheers!
mar77i
umount -f /mnt/sshfs
umount -f /mnt/sshfs
umount -f /mnt/sshfs
umount -f /mnt/sshfs
umount -f /mnt/sshfs
umount -f /mnt/sshfs
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 05:31:26PM +0200, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> > XML is for the file listing. :-)
> > https://s3-ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com/krkl
>
> That link is a crime against humanity and progress. It???s like giving
> bibles to children.
No, the style is not as good.
On Tue, May 14, 2013, at 8:50, Martti Kühne wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 2:44 PM, wrote:
> > On Mon, May 13, 2013, at 23:20, Sam Watkins wrote:
> >> HTTP PUT with ranges would be useful, could mount filesystems over HTTP.
> >
> > There's no standard HTTP directory listing.
>
> How is lack of
On 14/05/2013 17:12, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> Just use fucking FTP. It has sessions, encryption, (somewhat)
> standardized directory listenings, separate file transfer, progress
> bars (client feature) and everything you need to add yet another hack
> to the web.
As stated, having the server reve
Nicolas Braud-Santoni dixit:
>Well, SFTP requires you to create a user account. (I'm aware that it may
>not be one with which you can SSH in).
>Some people might not want this.
If someone does not have a user account on your site, they
have no business uploading large files either.
If you’re on
On 05/25/2013 07:29 PM, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote:
Well, SFTP requires you to create a user account. (I'm aware that it may
not be one with which you can SSH in).
Some people might not want this.
Everything runs as a user. You could use www-data, whatever anonymous
FTP uses, or simply "nobody"
Somebody signing messages as Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote:
Well, SFTP requires you to create a user account. (I'm aware that it may
not be one with which you can SSH in).
The OpenSSH implementation more-or-less requires that (though it's really
not a big deal), but the protocol does not require
24 matches
Mail list logo
