Le dimanche 20 juin 2010 à 04:25:36, Martin Kopta a écrit :
> http://imgur.com/oPOeW.png
>
Good job!
--
Julien Pecqueur (JPEC)
Site: http://julienpecqueur.com
Email: j...@julienpecqueur.com
PGP:B1AA2389 (GNUPG)
IRC:jpec (irc.freenode.net)
Powered by Archlinux - Keep it simple stupi
2010/6/20 Martin Kopta :
> http://imgur.com/oPOeW.png
src?
--
MfG
Kai Heide
Es reitet der Heidereiter durch die Heide weiter
> > http://imgur.com/oPOeW.png
> src?
ITT
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 07:30:16AM +0200, Kai Heide wrote:
> 2010/6/20 Martin Kopta :
> > http://imgur.com/oPOeW.png
> src?
http://bender.eugenics-research.org/picture-src
pgpgvC3FM8aaK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>>
>> On 21 June 2010 17:27, Uriel wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:56 PM, anonymous wrote:
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 09:46:12PM +0200, ⚖ Alexander "Surma" Surma
wr
Hi list,
Anselm R Garbe wrote:
On 21 June 2010 17:27, Uriel wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:56 PM, anonymous wrote:
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 09:46:12PM +0200, ⚖ Alexander "Surma" Surma wrote:
I was just about to ask, Creatives Common BY-SA?
Already discussed on this list, but for softwar
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 05:53:30PM +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
On 21 June 2010 17:27, Uriel wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:56 PM, anonymous wrote:
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 09:46:12PM +0200, ⚖ Alexander "Surma" Surma wrote:
I was just about to ask, Creatives Common BY-SA?
Already discuss
On 21 June 2010 17:27, Uriel wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:56 PM, anonymous wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 09:46:12PM +0200, ⚖ Alexander "Surma" Surma wrote:
>>> I was just about to ask, Creatives Common BY-SA?
>>
>> Already discussed on this list, but for software instead of art.
>> Unl
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:56 PM, anonymous wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 09:46:12PM +0200, ⚖ Alexander "Surma" Surma wrote:
>> I was just about to ask, Creatives Common BY-SA?
>
> Already discussed on this list, but for software instead of art.
> Unlicense[1] for software,
While in principle
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 09:46:12PM +0200, ⚖ Alexander "Surma" Surma wrote:
> I was just about to ask, Creatives Common BY-SA?
Already discussed on this list, but for software instead of art.
Unlicense[1] for software, CC0[2] for art if you want to place your
work into "public domain" and allow any
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Kris Maglione wrote:
> Not that there's anything wrong with BY-SA or any other CC licenses. It's a
> matter of personal preference (though I'm personally never fond of SA-type
> clauses, especially when they take on a viral bent).
It is not a matter of personal p
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 11:16 PM, Ethan Grammatikidis
wrote:
>
> On 20 Jun 2010, at 22:08, ⚖ Alexander Surma Surma wrote:
>
>> The problem with public domain is, that it's not really global (some
>> country behave differently).
>
> I used this in rc-httpd:
>
> LICENSE
>
> None. rc-httpd i
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Ethan Grammatikidis
wrote:
> Ah, thanks.
>
> Grr, stupid laws, making me *think!*
Of course, nobody's forcing you to go to any of those retarded
countries. In fact, such countries are clearly led and populated by
complete morons, so there's no reason to care what
Dnia 20 czerwca 2010 23:16 Ethan Grammatikidis
napisał(a):
> I used this in rc-httpd:
>
> LICENSE
>
>None. rc-httpd is in the public domain, I give up all rights to it.
>For countries without a concept of public domain, consider it
> entirely
>without owner.
>
> If
On 20 Jun 2010, at 22:54, Kris Maglione wrote:
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 10:16:11PM +0100, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote:
On 20 Jun 2010, at 22:08, ⚖ Alexander Surma Surma wrote:
The problem with public domain is, that it's not really global (some
country behave differently).
I used this in rc-
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 10:49:43PM +0200, ⚖ Alexander "Surma" Surma wrote:
WTFPL
Lol, did not know that one! That's even better.
I prefer BEER-WARE myself.
--
Kris Maglione
A program is portable to the extent that it can be easily moved to a
new computing environment with much less effort t
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 10:16:11PM +0100, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote:
On 20 Jun 2010, at 22:08, ⚖ Alexander Surma Surma wrote:
The problem with public domain is, that it's not really global (some
country behave differently).
I used this in rc-httpd:
LICENSE
None. rc-httpd
On 20 Jun 2010, at 22:08, ⚖ Alexander Surma Surma wrote:
The problem with public domain is, that it's not really global (some
country behave differently).
I used this in rc-httpd:
LICENSE
None. rc-httpd is in the public domain, I give up all rights to it.
For countries
Dnia 20 czerwca 2010 23:08 ⚖ Alexander "Surma" Surma
napisał(a):
> The problem with public domain is, that it's not really global (some
> country behave differently).
+
The problem with public domain is, that it's not really global (some
country behave differently).
And whats wrong with CC-BY? or CC-SA?
PS: I don't want to spark yet another license war! Just askin for reasons.
Surma
Public domain, or if you really love CC, use CC0, all their other
licenses are crap.
uriel
2010/6/20 ⚖ Alexander "Surma" Surma :
> I was just about to ask, Creatives Common BY-SA?
>
> On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Daniel Baumann wrote:
>> On 06/20/2010 05:26 PM, Martin Kopta wrote:
May I
Next time do your homework properly then.
On 6/20/10, ⚖ Alexander "Surma" Surma wrote:
>> WTFPL
> Lol, did not know that one! That's even better.
>
>
> --
> Alexander "cussing-makes-my-arguments-even-more-valid" Surma
>
>
> WTFPL
Lol, did not know that one! That's even better.
--
Alexander "cussing-makes-my-arguments-even-more-valid" Surma
> I was just about to ask, Creatives Common BY-SA?
WTFPL
wall-suckless.tar.xz
Description: Binary data
I was just about to ask, Creatives Common BY-SA?
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 06/20/2010 05:26 PM, Martin Kopta wrote:
>>> May I post this to another list? I think it's great ;)
>> Yes, of course. I can send you vectors if you want to.
>
> please do so, bonus points
On 06/20/2010 05:26 PM, Martin Kopta wrote:
>> May I post this to another list? I think it's great ;)
> Yes, of course. I can send you vectors if you want to.
please do so, bonus points for publishing it under a free license.
Regards,
Daniel
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3
Thank god suckless.org got to have a meaning.
On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 17:26:44 +0200
Martin Kopta wrote:
> > May I post this to another list? I think it's great ;)
> Yes, of course. I can send you vectors if you want to.
Yes, please.
> May I post this to another list? I think it's great ;)
Yes, of course. I can send you vectors if you want to.
On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 16:25:36 +0200
Martin Kopta wrote:
> http://imgur.com/oPOeW.png
>
May I post this to another list? I think it's great ;)
On 20 Jun 2010, at 15:25, Martin Kopta wrote:
http://imgur.com/oPOeW.png
Once I started thinking of those things as alien jellyfish I started
to like it.
I'm not saying what my first thought was. ó.o
You forgot "brutality" ;)
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Kris Maglione wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 04:25:36PM +0200, Martin Kopta wrote:
>>
>> http://imgur.com/oPOeW.png
>>
>
> I can't help but notice that that conjures two, erm... not unrelated images.
>
> --
> Kris Maglione
>
> “Did God
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 04:25:36PM +0200, Martin Kopta wrote:
http://imgur.com/oPOeW.png
I can't help but notice that that conjures two, erm... not
unrelated images.
--
Kris Maglione
“Did God have a mother?” Children, when told that God made the heavens
and the earth, innocently ask whethe
33 matches
Mail list logo
