Folks,
The site is up [1]. Artifacts are uploaded and can be downloaded from the
site. Maven artifacts have been uploaded too [2] and the source tag has been
created [3].
Thanks for all the support, without all your support this have not been
possible at all :-)
Lets try to not to let the
Hi ,
If we look at the current Synapse filter mediator it does not support regex
based filtering for multi-line Strings.
IMO having that feature is useful since there are scenarios where we need
to do reg-ex filtering in multi-line Strings in message.
So as a solution to that i thought of
+1, looks to me a good improvement from the usability point of view.
Ruwan
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Charith Wickramarachchi
charith.dhanus...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi ,
If we look at the current Synapse filter mediator it does not support regex
based filtering for multi-line Strings.
Hi Charith,
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Charith Wickramarachchi
charith.dhanus...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi ,
If we look at the current Synapse filter mediator it does not support regex
based filtering for multi-line Strings.
IMO having that feature is useful since there are scenarios
HI Again,
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Hiranya Jayathilaka
hiranya...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Charith,
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Charith Wickramarachchi
charith.dhanus...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi ,
If we look at the current Synapse filter mediator it does not support
regex based
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Hiranya Jayathilaka
hiranya...@gmail.comwrote:
HI Again,
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Hiranya Jayathilaka
hiranya...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Charith,
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Charith Wickramarachchi
charith.dhanus...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi ,
+1 for the idea. BTW, Is there any way to do this without introducing a new
attribute? i.e only using the regex.
Thanks,
Indika
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Charith Wickramarachchi
charith.dhanus...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi ,
If we look at the current Synapse filter mediator it does not
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:47 PM, indika kumara indika.k...@gmail.comwrote:
+1 for the idea. BTW, Is there any way to do this without introducing a new
attribute? i.e only using the regex.
Hi Indika,
We need to have the flags at the time we compile the regex
ex :
Pattern pattern =