Some thoughts to Approach this. First we have to decide on the security
abstraction layer in syncope like:
1) Wicket (as implemented now)
2) Spring Security
3) Shiro
This decision is independent of what kind of security protocol is chosen like
WS-Federation, SAML, CAS (proprietary protocol) or O
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNCOPE-405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13774524#comment-13774524
]
Hudson commented on SYNCOPE-405:
SUCCESS: Integrated in Syncope-trunk #453 (See
[https:/
Il 23/09/2013 14:41, Francesco Chicchiriccò ha scritto:
Hi all,
sorry for crossposting: let's keep this discusson on dev@, so please
remove user@ from any future reply.
Thanks Francesco.
Hi all,
Starting a discussion thread in the developer sounds good.
We have to consider that there actuall
Hi all,
sorry for crossposting: let's keep this discusson on dev@, so please
remove user@ from any future reply.
Rgeards.
On 23/09/2013 14:22, Strunk, Wolfgang wrote:
Hi all,
Starting a discussion thread in the developer sounds good.
We have to consider that there actually will be three th
Build Update for apache/syncope
-
Build: #248
Status: Errored
Duration: 5 minutes and 26 seconds
Commit: 0a7c978 (trunk)
Author: Francesco Chicchiriccò
Message: [SYNCOPE-405] Completing log4j2 conf with latest features from
2.0-beta9
git-svn-id: https://svn.a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNCOPE-393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13774409#comment-13774409
]
fabio martelli commented on SYNCOPE-393:
Add:
* de-provision (remove from resourc
