On 04/06/14 12:13, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
On 04/06/2014 13:09, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
Am I correct in assuming that the REST API for 1.2 exposes the CXF-based
REST service under "/rest", and that the old API previously available
under
"/rest" is removed?
Correct.
I think it would
On 04/06/2014 13:09, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
Am I correct in assuming that the REST API for 1.2 exposes the CXF-based
REST service under "/rest", and that the old API previously available under
"/rest" is removed?
Correct.
I think it would probably be a good idea to redirect "/cxf" queries
Am I correct in assuming that the REST API for 1.2 exposes the CXF-based
REST service under "/rest", and that the old API previously available under
"/rest" is removed?
I think it would probably be a good idea to redirect "/cxf" queries to
"/rest" so as not to break REST-based 1.1 clients, WDYT?