Re: 1.2 REST API

2014-06-04 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
On 04/06/14 12:13, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: On 04/06/2014 13:09, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: Am I correct in assuming that the REST API for 1.2 exposes the CXF-based REST service under "/rest", and that the old API previously available under "/rest" is removed? Correct. I think it would

Re: 1.2 REST API

2014-06-04 Thread Francesco Chicchiriccò
On 04/06/2014 13:09, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: Am I correct in assuming that the REST API for 1.2 exposes the CXF-based REST service under "/rest", and that the old API previously available under "/rest" is removed? Correct. I think it would probably be a good idea to redirect "/cxf" queries

1.2 REST API

2014-06-04 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
Am I correct in assuming that the REST API for 1.2 exposes the CXF-based REST service under "/rest", and that the old API previously available under "/rest" is removed? I think it would probably be a good idea to redirect "/cxf" queries to "/rest" so as not to break REST-based 1.1 clients, WDYT?