dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Date: 10/24/2016 11:54 AM
Subject: Re: Local versions of Linear Algebra Operators in DML
well, we still compute memory estimates for these operations. So I
guess, a good compromise would be to raise a warning whenever the memory
estimate is known to excee
Research Center
office: (408) 927 2208; T/L: 457 2208
e-mail: reinw...@us.ibm.com
From: Matthias Boehm
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Date: 10/24/2016 11:54 AM
Subject:Re: Local versions of Linear Algebra Operators in DML
well, we still compute memory estimates for
1:14 PM
Subject: Re: Local versions of Linear Algebra Operators in DML
I am also comfortable with option (2) ... "with a plan to implement its
distributed version"
Thanks,
Niketan Pansare
IBM Almaden Research Center
E-mail: npansar At us.ibm.com
http://researcher.watson.ib
en jiras for it.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Berthold Reinwald
> > IBM Almaden Research Center
> > office: (408) 927 2208; T/L: 457 2208
> > e-mail: reinw...@us.ibm.com
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Niketan Pansare/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS
> > To:
sare/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS
> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> Date: 10/21/2016 01:14 PM
> Subject:Re: Local versions of Linear Algebra Operators in DML
>
>
>
> I am also comfortable with option (2) ... "with a plan to implement its
>
maden/IBM@IBMUS
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Date: 10/21/2016 01:14 PM
Subject: Re: Local versions of Linear Algebra Operators in DML
I am also comfortable with option (2) ... "with a plan to implement its
distributed version"
Thanks,
Niketan Pansare
IBM Almad
o: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Date: 10/21/2016 01:00 PM
Subject: Re: Local versions of Linear Algebra Operators in DML
thanks Nakul for reaching out before starting work on this. Actually,
the introduction of these CP-only builtin functions was a big mistake
because (as you already menti
esearcher/view.php?person=us-npansar
From: Deron Eriksson
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Date: 10/21/2016 12:52 PM
Subject: Re: Local versions of Linear Algebra Operators in DML
Hi Nakul,
+1
I think having some clear characteristic to distinguish operations that
only o
thanks Nakul for reaching out before starting work on this. Actually,
the introduction of these CP-only builtin functions was a big mistake
because (as you already mentioned) they mistakenly suggest that we
provide distributed operations for them too. The intend was to support
them in later ver
Hi Nakul,
+1
I think having some clear characteristic to distinguish operations that
only operate locally is a great idea. Otherwise, how would a user know that
these operations are only local and not distributed? Adding this naming
convention for local operations sounds reasonable to me so that w
Hi,
Imran was planning on implementing a distributed SVD as a DML bodied
function.
The algorithm is described in the paper titled "A Distributed and
Incremental SVD Algorithm for Agglomerative Data Analysis on Large
Networks" available at https://arxiv.org/abs/1601.07010.
This algorithm requires
11 matches
Mail list logo
