Igor Drobiazko: +1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
> I've created and uploaded a release of Tapestry 5.1.0.1, ready to be voted
> upon.
>
> Again, 5.1.0.1 represents some significant improvements to Tapestry 5
> and getting wider exposure of these
> change
Em Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:55:13 -0300, Howard Lewis Ship
escreveu:
To be fixed in 5.1.0.2, once we can reproduce the problem. Release
early, release often!
Take a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-573. It's the
Ars Machina Example Project. All the form submissions that crea
Joachim Van der Auwera : +1 (non-binding)
Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
I've created and uploaded a release of Tapestry 5.1.0.1, ready to be voted upon.
Again, 5.1.0.1 represents some significant improvements to Tapestry 5
and getting wider exposure of these
changes is important. I hope that we may
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
> I've created and uploaded a release of Tapestry 5.1.0.1, ready to be voted
> upon.
Massimo Lusetti: +1 (non-binding)
--
Massimo
http://meridio.blogspot.com
-
To uns
Em Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:55:13 -0300, Howard Lewis Ship
escreveu:
To be fixed in 5.1.0.2, once we can reproduce the problem. Release
early, release often!
+1 (non-binding), reason stated above, even when the problems I mentioned
are almost blocking.
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Indep
Andreas,
Another alternative might be to use the Maven repository on
Tapestry360 instead of uploading the people.apache.org?
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
> Please go forward with this!
>
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Andreas Andreou wrote:
>> So, i can offer t
Em Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:50:23 -0300, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
escreveu:
What about the namespacePrefix and NPEs problems?
I forgot to mention the JIRA issue
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-554) and two mailing list
threads:
http://www.nabble.com/5.1-Parameter-namespace
To be fixed in 5.1.0.2, once we can reproduce the problem. Release
early, release often!
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 9:50 AM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
wrote:
> What about the namespacePrefix and NPEs problems?
>
> --
> Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
> Independent Java consultant, developer, and
What about the namespacePrefix and NPEs problems?
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java consultant, developer, and instructor
http://www.arsmachina.com.br/thiago
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apa
It certainly centralizes the logic which is good.
I'm afraid I left the tests a bit of a mess; I kludged together a lot
of code to make the unit tests work. To be honest, the
PageRenderDispatcher and ComponentEventDispatcher tests should be tiny
now, and there should be significantly more code in
I've created and uploaded a release of Tapestry 5.1.0.1, ready to be voted upon.
Again, 5.1.0.1 represents some significant improvements to Tapestry 5
and getting wider exposure of these
changes is important. I hope that we may vote 5.1.0.1 up as a beta
release in a couple of weeks.
The files are
Obviously, this is a typo. This is about the 5.1.0.1 release (.2
hasn't even started yet). I'll post a new vote.
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
> I've created and uploaded a release of Tapestry 5.1.0.2, ready to be voted
> upon.
>
> Again, 5.1.0.2 represents some sig
Please go forward with this!
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Andreas Andreou wrote:
> So, i can offer to write an issue there for us + make sure everything
> is ok with them
>
> As i can understand from the whole process, the only sideeffect i can
> think of is
> to those using the people.apache
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
> I've created and uploaded a release of Tapestry 5.1.0.2, ready to be voted
> upon.
Massimo Lusetti: +1 (non-binding)
T5 is surprising with any commits!
--
Massimo
http://meridio.blogspot.com
I've created and uploaded a release of Tapestry 5.1.0.2, ready to be voted upon.
Again, 5.1.0.2 represents some significant improvements to Tapestry 5
and getting wider exposure of these
changes is important. I hope that we may vote 5.1.0.2 up as a beta
release in a couple of weeks.
The files are
So, i can offer to write an issue there for us + make sure everything
is ok with them
As i can understand from the whole process, the only sideeffect i can
think of is
to those using the people.apache.org snapshot repo - because the
artifacts will be
removed from there (and moved into repository.a
I believe it was Andy that volunteered on the Nexus front. I try to avoid
maven stuff at every chance I can ;-)
What I'm looking to do is bring in the Tapestry5-Cayenne integration module.
Robert and I are wrapping up a standalone release on the GoogleCode
project. I'll probably hold up until af
17 matches
Mail list logo
