Oh, and for the curious, here is the list of /tapestry5.x pages for
which I don't think we have anything newer:
tapestry5.1/glassfish.html
tapestry5.2-dev/glassfish.html
tapestry5.0/jboss.html
tapestry5.1/jboss.html
tapestry5.2-dev/jboss.html
tapestry5.0/jetty.html
tapestry5.1/jetty.html
tapestry5
Following Mark's advice, I wrote and ran a little Perl script that
inserted an "outdated" box at the top of all of the old 5.x
documentation pages (except the javadocs) and also inserts a tag in the so Google (and other search
engines) can do a better job of identifying the newer stuff as more
im
You are right!
Besides that there's a similar issue with the test classes in tapestry-core
(TapestryTestCase and PageTester). To be consequent these ones should be moved
to a test-only jar as well. (Or is IOCTestCase unlike the others not meant to
be used by users?)
After all it looks odd to m
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Tapestry Wiki" for
change notification.
The "FrontPage" page has been changed by swiker:
http://wiki.apache.org/tapestry/FrontPage?action=diff&rev1=283&rev2=284
This wiki is part of the [[ApacheGeneral:FrontPage
It would create a circular dependency.
Отправлено с iPhone
12.06.2011, в 21:19, Christian Riedel
написал(а):
Don't create more modules! It would be sufficient to put IOCTestCase
into tapestry-test, I think... :-)
Am 12.06.2011 um 20:57 schrieb Igor Drobiazko:
You are right but same a
Don't create more modules! It would be sufficient to put IOCTestCase into
tapestry-test, I think... :-)
Am 12.06.2011 um 20:57 schrieb Igor Drobiazko:
> You are right but same applies for org.testng:testng.
>
> However, Gradle's "idea" plugin skips provided dependencies and it results
> in com
You are right but same applies for org.testng:testng.
However, Gradle's "idea" plugin skips provided dependencies and it results
in compilation errors in IOCTestCase. This class is located in src/main/java
but depends on tapestry-test which has the provided scope. IOCTestCase is a
test dependency
Are you sure this is correct? It seems to me that it will make
tapestry-test a transient dependency of tapestry-core. Having it be a
provided dependency should not make it a transient dependency, and I
believe that's what we want.
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 11:18 PM, wrote:
> Author: drobiazko
>
