Re: [VOTE] Tapestry 5.3.1

2011-12-18 Thread angelochen
Angelo Chen: +1(non-binding) -- View this message in context: http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Tapestry-5-3-1-tp5072199p5085066.html Sent from the Tapestry - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e

Re: [VOTE] Tapestry 5.3.1

2011-12-18 Thread François Facon
François Facon: +1(non-binding) well done Massimo. Best. 2011/12/18 Taha Hafeez Siddiqi : > Taha Hafeez: +1(non-binding) > > BTW, Congrats Massimo !! > > On Dec 18, 2011, at 5:41 PM, Ulrich Stärk wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Am So, 18.12.2011, 12:34 schrieb Igor Drobiazko: >>> C'mon guys, let's be less

Re: [VOTE] Tapestry 5.3.1

2011-12-18 Thread Taha Hafeez Siddiqi
Taha Hafeez: +1(non-binding) BTW, Congrats Massimo !! On Dec 18, 2011, at 5:41 PM, Ulrich Stärk wrote: > +1 > > Am So, 18.12.2011, 12:34 schrieb Igor Drobiazko: >> C'mon guys, let's be less bureaucratic. We have a ready to be used release >> that has a fix for a serious bug (TAP5-1765). Why del

Re: [VOTE] Tapestry 5.3.1

2011-12-18 Thread Ulrich Stärk
+1 Am So, 18.12.2011, 12:34 schrieb Igor Drobiazko: > C'mon guys, let's be less bureaucratic. We have a ready to be used release > that has a fix for a serious bug (TAP5-1765). Why delaying that if we can > ship? Massimo, please let the release pass. > > Apart from that, we have 3 binding votes (H

Re: [VOTE] Tapestry 5.3.1

2011-12-18 Thread Igor Drobiazko
C'mon guys, let's be less bureaucratic. We have a ready to be used release that has a fix for a serious bug (TAP5-1765). Why delaying that if we can ship? Massimo, please let the release pass. Apart from that, we have 3 binding votes (Howard, Uli and me). On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Massimo

Re: [VOTE] Tapestry 5.3.1

2011-12-18 Thread Massimo Lusetti
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 8:09 PM, Ulrich Stärk wrote: > Just to clarify: releases can't be vetoed, not even by binding PMC votes. As > long as there are at least 3 binding +1 votes, it's up to the release > manager, i.e. Massimo in this case, to decide whether to bury it or proceed. Thanks for

Additional Persist Scope: Window State

2011-12-18 Thread Gerold Glaser
Dear Listeners! Our customer needs multiple window/tab support in the application. Due to the current session state limitations for the web I know there is no out-of-the-box support for a window/tab state. I found an interesting article about the possibilities to overcome the problem of the brows