+1 Am So, 18.12.2011, 12:34 schrieb Igor Drobiazko: > C'mon guys, let's be less bureaucratic. We have a ready to be used release > that has a fix for a serious bug (TAP5-1765). Why delaying that if we can > ship? Massimo, please let the release pass. > > Apart from that, we have 3 binding votes (Howard, Uli and me). > > On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Massimo Lusetti > <mluse...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 8:09 PM, Ulrich Stärk <u...@spielviel.de> wrote: >> >> > Just to clarify: releases can't be vetoed, not even by binding PMC >> votes. As long as there are at least 3 binding +1 votes, it's up to the >> release manager, i.e. Massimo in this case, to decide whether to bury it >> or >> proceed. >> >> Thanks for clarifying the process. >> >> > I agree it's unfortunate that a fix for a problem in 5.3 did not make >> it >> into the first bugfix release but that's not a reason to hold up the >> release. >> >> I think I will do 5.3.2 soon and will let 5.3.1 fall apart, hoping to >> have a quicker vote process... Will everyone agree? >> >> Cheers >> -- >> Massimo >> http://meridio.blogspot.com >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org >> >> > > > -- > Best regards, > > Igor Drobiazko > http://tapestry5.de > http://twitter.com/drobiazko >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
