Dimitris Zenios: +1 (non-binding)
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 6:40 AM, Kalle Korhonen
wrote:
> Kalle Korhonen: +1 (non-binding)
>
>
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Howard Lewis Ship
> wrote:
>
> > I've created and uploaded a release of Tapestry 5.4-beta-6, ready to be
> > voted upon.
> >
> > The
Lenny Primak: +1 (non-binding)
A huge +1 for 5.3.8 release that supports Java 8.
> On May 16, 2014, at 3:54 PM, Bob Harner wrote:
>
> Bob Harner: +1 (non-binding)
>
> (As an aside, it's been over a year since our last 5.3.x release. It
> might be good to put out a 5.3.8 release soon, which wi
Kalle Korhonen: +1 (non-binding)
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
> I've created and uploaded a release of Tapestry 5.4-beta-6, ready to be
> voted upon.
>
> The source and source downloads are uploaded to:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~hlship/tapestry-releases/
>
> and
François Facon: +1 (non-binding)
2014-05-15 15:14 GMT+02:00 Jochen Kemnade :
> There have been discussions whether we want to keep compatibility with
> Java 5 for the upcoming 5.4 release.
> Java 5 is EOSL since October 2009.
> While requiring Java 6 would not bring us much benefits, there migh
There have been discussions whether we want to keep compatibility with
Java 5 for the upcoming 5.4 release.
Java 5 is EOSL since October 2009.
While requiring Java 6 would not bring us much benefits, there might be
some libraries that we cannot use because they do not support Java 5.
Also, we'd
Is this going to be a public release?
Cheers,
Dragan Sahpaski
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 5:42 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
> I'm doing the build & upload right now.
>
>
> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 7:40 AM, Howard Lewis Ship
> wrote:
>
> > I can take care of it, but there is documentation on the wi
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder tapestry-site-production
while building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/tapestry-site-production/builds/573
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: bb-cms-slave
Build Reason:
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder tapestry-site-production
while building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/tapestry-site-production/builds/572
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: bb-cms-slave
Build Reason: Th
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder tapestry-site-production
while building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/tapestry-site-production/builds/582
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: bb-cms-slave
Build Reason:
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder tapestry-site-production
while building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/tapestry-site-production/builds/602
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: bb-cms-slave
Build Reason:
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder tapestry-site-production
while building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/tapestry-site-production/builds/599
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: bb-cms-slave
Build Reason: Th
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder tapestry-site-production
while building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/tapestry-site-production/builds/601
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: bb-cms-slave
Build Reason: Th
I'd need to know a bit more; this will tend to break 3rd party libraries
that compile against the old code, which is not so good. Possibly if the
new information could be added under an entirely new method of the existing
APIs that would be less of a problem.
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Lanc
Am 13.05.2014 17:29, schrieb Jochen Kemnade:
Alright, I just closed the issues that have not been modified since
Uli's comment. I also removed the bulk-close-candidate from the ones
that had newer changes.
Now, do we want to repeat the process with
project = TAP5 AND status = Open AND assignee i
Hi Lance,
as far as I can see the public API was extended several times in the
past. A lot methods are marked as @since 5.2.
The only potential problem I see is in "Binding" since people might have
implemented their own. It's quite unlikely that someone has it's own
ComponentResources and such
Bob Harner: +1 (non-binding)
(As an aside, it's been over a year since our last 5.3.x release. It
might be good to put out a 5.3.8 release soon, which will remain Java
5 compatible, of course.)
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Jochen Kemnade
wrote:
> There have been discussions whether we want t
Am 15.05.2014 15:14, schrieb Jochen Kemnade:
There have been discussions whether we want to keep compatibility with
Java 5 for the upcoming 5.4 release.
Java 5 is EOSL since October 2009.
While requiring Java 6 would not bring us much benefits, there might be
some libraries that we cannot use bec
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder tapestry-site-production
while building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/tapestry-site-production/builds/581
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: bb-cms-slave
Build Reason: Th
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder tapestry-site-production
while building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/tapestry-site-production/builds/600
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: bb-cms-slave
Build Reason:
I've created and uploaded a release of Tapestry 5.4-beta-6, ready to be
voted upon.
The source and source downloads are uploaded to:
http://people.apache.org/~hlship/tapestry-releases/
and the Maven artifacts staged to:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetapestry-1014
Ulrich Stärk: +0 (binding)
As I said earlier, I don't see the benefit in upgrading to 'just' 1.6 right
now, even if it means we
could use newer versions of our dependencies. If you want to do it anyway I
won't stand in your way.
Cheers,
Uli
On 2014-05-15 15:14, Jochen Kemnade wrote:
> There h
Hi Michael, in future... Please post to the user's mailing list. This list
is for the tapestry development team.
No, this is not a bug. Pages and components are singletons. Under the hood
they use bindings to get() and set() dynamic values at runtime. In this
instance the binding can get() a Field
Not a bug. Defaults are allowed to supply either a literal default or a
binding. The binding's "get" will evaluate to an object of the proper type.
In fact, if memory serves, when you supply a literal value, tapestry wraps that
in a "literal binding" anyway, because under the hood, all of thos
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder tapestry-site-production
while building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/tapestry-site-production/builds/598
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: bb-cms-slave
Build Reason:
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder tapestry-site-production
while building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/tapestry-site-production/builds/597
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: bb-cms-slave
Build Reason: Th
+1
On 2014-05-15 15:22, Jochen Kemnade wrote:
> Am 13.05.2014 17:29, schrieb Jochen Kemnade:
>> Alright, I just closed the issues that have not been modified since
>> Uli's comment. I also removed the bulk-close-candidate from the ones
>> that had newer changes.
>> Now, do we want to repeat the pr
Hi,
I found something I do not understand and which is probably a bug. From
org.apache.tapestry5.corelib.base.AbstractTextField:
@Parameter(required = true, allowNull = false, defaultPrefix =
BindingConstants.TRANSLATE)
private FieldTranslator translate;
@Parameter(defaultPrefix
Well then, since Uli had some reservations wrt. updading to Java 6, we
probably do need a vote. I'll start one in a new thread.
Jochen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mai
Am 14.05.2014 16:40, schrieb Howard Lewis Ship:
I can take care of it, but there is documentation on the wiki on the full
process.
Yeah, found it, thanks. I created the git tag and tried to create the
release. The last attempts failed. I will try again tonight (CEST) if
nobody does it by then
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder tapestry-site-production
while building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/tapestry-site-production/builds/570
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: bb-cms-slave
Build Reason:
I'm doing the build & upload right now.
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 7:40 AM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
> I can take care of it, but there is documentation on the wiki on the full
> process. I believe I've been keeping it up to date, but there's a bit of
> initial setup to keep Gradle happy (and abl
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder tapestry-site-production
while building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/tapestry-site-production/builds/569
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: bb-cms-slave
Build Reason: Th
32 matches
Mail list logo
